Everyone loves Guhin, and he's a really sweet person and a caring, welcoming professor. However, I have to say as far as explaining the actual subject matter, I didn't find him that helpful. The lectures were a little too focused on his ideas and thoughts about the theorists and reading, rather helping students to understand the arguments of each theorist. You could come away from a lecture knowing Guhin's ideas and passions more than with a breakdown of the theory or argument, which is bad because later you have to write a lot of papers about that argument. TAs are helpful to a point with that but it's a crapshoot whether you get a helpful TA or not. In any case be prepared to read a lot and DO NOT get behind on reading.

This professor is THE best professor that I have had while at UCLA. He is the first professor at UCLA that I have had that genuinely cares about his students and their mental health. His lectures are very entertaining as he loves to make jokes and are also very engaging. He talks fast, so you have to pay attention in lecture but overall the course load and material is very manageable. I also highly recommend going to his office hours. I found them to be very beneficial to my understanding of the material and enjoyed discussing different theorists with him. 10/10 recommend this course.

He definitely cares about his students. The class went through a rough start, as he gave us super hard readings, but once the class gave him feedback the class was actually really doable and I was able to learn a lot from it. He is also funny. If just want the A it is doable, but not easy at all. If you really just want to learn I highly recommend.

Overall, Professor Guhin is a nice person, but he is not a good lecturer. He was constantly very unorganized and the lectures felt very rushed. He was not good at explaining concepts and theories, and instead relied upon taking quotes from the readings and dissecting them. This was not an effective way for me to learn the material and I know others struggled with it as well. However, with a lot of studying and hard work, you can certainly get an A. The class is structured with weekly quizzes, no midterm, and a final exam. The quizzes were mostly easy as they are based on the lectures and readings and the questions are not meant to be hard. The final consists of multiple choice, matching, and written response. The multiple choice and matching were easy but the written response was very hard and required a lot of studying and preparation.

Professor Guhin's Soc 102 is easier than Sigmon's 101. Reason being is that Guhin has no midterm and the final is only worth 30%, so even if you do shit on it, you can still easily earn an A in the class as long as you put in the work by attending lecture taking notes for the MC quizzes we have every day during lecture. His lectures are pretty entertaining, and you should go every time since we have quizzes.

The quizzes themselves are based on his lectures, so pro tip you don't have to read the readings (unless he changes things up). Lectures are recorded and I often rewatched lectures to study for quizzes.

The final is fucking insane. We basically have to memorize a 3 paragraph answer to a question x 10. But luckily that's only 60% of the final which is already only worth 30%, so even if you got like a C on that portion you can still end with an A in the class. The other 40% of the final is comedically easy.

Class is light work until the final week. I'd definitely take him again. w prof.

Theory is not my favorite, but Soc 102 w Guhin was not too bad. Guhin is really smart and an engaging lecturer, and my favorite parts of the lectures would be when he connected the class content with current political events/real life examples applicable to college life. However, as other reviews have mentioned, I didnt feel like I got a clear understanding of what each theorist was arguing, which made studying for the final tricky. I thought i had a good grasp on the content week by week because of the quizzes every lecture, but the cumulative final wasnt it. He requires handwritten notes and talks quick so i recommend taking the best notes possible during lecture, and then watching it back to fill in what ur missing.

Honestly thought this class was easy at first, but I was wrong he has mandatory lectures twice a week that you can not miss because he gives a quiz every lecture. He missed so many classes and was so unorganized, there is also no midterm which might sound good but then there is a cumulative final that is actual hell there's so much to memorize.

Professor is really funny, makes dad jokes, the 3 quizzes are fair as long as you know the main arguments for the theorists. There are 2 papers you can basically write about any theorists from the class. Recommend!

Lectures are recorded (not required to attend), there are 3 quizzes throughout the quarter that tests if you have read them, but if you go over the powerpoints and listen to his lecture a couple of times you should be ok. I ended up not reading the readings and still did ok on the quizzes. There are also 2 essays that you have to write on a theorist and how ChatGPT analyzed the theorist wrong. All very straightforward. There are also questionnaires that are basically free points for you to get if you do them.

Professor Guhin is very passionate about sociology and has very engaging lectures. He really cares about his student's mental health, makes jokes (be prepared for dad jokes!), and he's very approachable and kind. The study guides were a bit difficult in my opinion and sometimes during lecture, he placed more emphasis on his own thoughts about the sociologist in question. The tests were a bit tricky in my opinion, but maybe I should have taken better notes. If you take this class, take thorough notes and stay on track with the readings!