Introduction to East Asia

Jennifer Jung-kim

Introduction to East Asia

International and Area Studies department

Jennifer Jung-kim

Add Review
from 2 users

Ratings

Bad
Overall 4.0
Good
Hard
Easiness of class 2.0
Easy
Heavy
Workload 2.5
Light
Not Clear
Clarity of professor 4.0
Clear
Not Helpful
Helpfulness of professor 3.5
Helpful
AD

Tags

  • Uses Slides
  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Engaging Lectures
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Tough Tests
  • Participation Matters
  • Would Take Again
  • Has Group Projects

Grades

Winter 2017
37.9%
31.6%
25.3%
19.0%
12.6%
6.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

Winter 2016
28.8%
24.0%
19.2%
14.4%
9.6%
4.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

Winter 2015
33.3%
27.8%
22.2%
16.7%
11.1%
5.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

Summer 2015
33.3%
27.8%
22.2%
16.7%
11.1%
5.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

Winter 2014
36.8%
30.7%
24.6%
18.4%
12.3%
6.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

Summer 2014
38.9%
32.4%
25.9%
19.4%
13.0%
6.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

AD
AD
1 of 1

Reviews

Quarter Taken: Winter 2017 Submitted April 4, 2017 Grade Received: A-

It was pretty interesting class. You receive your questions for midterm and final one week in advance so that you can prepare them beforehand. However, I found the grading of the exams random. She doesn't give you criteria for exams. But it is not difficult to get over 90% overall so that you can get some form of A if you do the readings and listen to lectures.

Quarter Taken: Winter 2016 Submitted April 13, 2016 Grade Received: A-

It's an interesting class, and I found the readings and topics chosen to be interesting. Jung-Kim is a clear and articulate lecturer, though if you do the readings and take notes from them beforehand, you don't really need to take any notes during lecture, which is good since she goes through her slides at a pretty quick pace.

The midterm and final questions are given about a week before each exam, though the grading standard for them is really high, and to be honest, fairly inconsistent. However, 45% of the grade comes from an easy group project and writing some posts on CCLE for discussion, which more than makes up for your exam grades if you don't get A's on them. Overall, it's probably not the easiest GE, but I'd take again.

1 of 1

Tags

  • Uses Slides
  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Engaging Lectures
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Tough Tests
  • Participation Matters
  • Would Take Again
  • Has Group Projects
ADS

Report Review

Did this review contain...

There are errors in the report form.

Thank you for the report!

We'll look into this shortly.

It seems like you’re

using an ad blocker. :(


Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!