Let me start by saying that I had high hopes coming into this class; I heard that it was a straightforward Writing II class and I was interested in the subject due to my religious background. Unfortunately, this class did not live up to expectations.

There are a few good things about the class. Dr. Smoak is passionate about teaching this class and it comes through in his lectures. He infuses pictures and anecdotes of his time in Jerusalem. He is also a nice and approachable person and was more willing to answer my questions than my TA. The midterm (10%) and final (10%) are extremely straightforward. As long as you memorize everything on the study guide that is given, you are set.

Unfortunately, this class has more cons than pros. Instead of learning about religion itself, this class focuses on the architecture and space and how it relates to religion. I wanted to learn more about how the three monotheistic religions developed, and less about how the buildings located in Jerusalem relate to religion. In addition, there are so many assigned readings that will take a few hours each week. 70% of your grade is dependent on your TA. That means that having a good relationship with your TA is key in this class. I had a horrible TA, one that was unwilling to help even when I went to office hours and asked additional questions. My TA was also extremely nit-picky about everything in grading.

Writing classes are subjective which is part of the reason why I do not like them in general, so just get a fair and good TA and this class will be ok. My recommendation is just to avoid this class unless you are really interested in Jerusalem's religious buildings.

Professor Smoak is a good lecturer you can really tell he knows his stuff. The material to be quite honest was different from what I had expected and was at times mundane. As another reviewer said, this class does focus its essays on the architectural and buildings of Jerusalem rather than the history/religion itself. Also the TA's make or break your grade. My TA was relatively difficult and it was difficult to pinpoint what the TA wanted fixed on my essay. Overall, I did pretty well on the exams and the first essay but on the second essay (which is weighted the heaviest in the class) I didn't do so hot. Overall, it's interesting but I wouldn't take it again.

Selling textbooks! Text **********

Yes it was so very interesting learning about this material and he really is a good lecturer, BUT if you are taking this only for a writing 2 not for minor or major then pick another.. this is a history class which had in my opinion a hard midterm and final so not only do you have to worry about your writing two essays (TA was very strict with the grading since this is a writing 2 class) but also worry about memorizing and knowing a lot of the historical background as well ! Quick pointer to those people who are reading about having two papers for the class, and that you get to submit a draft and then revise it... I WISH SOMEONE had TOLD ME THAT BOTH THE DRAFT AND THE REVISION COUNT IN MY GRADE AND EACH ARE WORTH A LOT before taking this class ! So beware everything counts. Best of luck !

About the class:
I absolutely loved the class. Its one of my favorite classes at UCLA. I found it so interesting and very different from other history/linguistic classes/my major science classes. I loved the project that we had to do and it really allowed me to be creative, something that I feel like gets lost in college especially in the middle of midterms and finals. Because of this class I took some other ancient near east classes and even decided to minor in ANE and egyptology as a south campus major!
About the professor:
He was a good professor! His requirements were very clear and he gave us study guides for the midterm/finals. He also gave us the answers during his review session so remember to go to those!

If you don't have any religious background, DON'T take this course. I didn't have a religious upbringing and have pretty much no knowledge about religion, and I definitely had to work a lot harder to grasp a lot of what was going on in the class.
This class is hugely dependent on your TA. I had a TA that said he hadn't given a single A the quarter before, and I'm pretty sure he didn't give any this quarter either. But I also think they've made the course more difficult over time-- I have friends who took this course a few years a go and said it was a lot easier. This course was genuinely one of the most difficult courses I have take at UCLA, and will be the first B I ever get (I'm a Junior, so I've taken a fair amount of classes).
The course content is relatively interesting, especially if you're into ancient history and buildings. Professor Smoak is clearly very knowledgeable and passionate about this topic, and his lectures are pretty engaging. If I had a TA that wasn't so hell bent on giving bad grades and a stronger religious background, this class may have been bearable. But it's A LOT of work for a Writing 2 or a GE. You can definitely find something easier to fulfill requirements if that's what you're looking for.

I thought this class was very interesting, but if you think it is an easy A then you will be mistaken like I was! Yes, it is one of the "easier" writing II classes but you are going to have to put in a good amount of effort to do well. We had weekly quizzes based on the readings which weren't too bad and two papers throughout the quarter, in which the draft and final count as a portion of your grade. The TAs grade very tough (no one in my section got an A on the first paper) but by the time the second paper comes around, you will have a good idea of what they expect. The final was also pretty fair, definitely need to put in studying rather than leaving it to the last minute. Overall, I do recommend this class!

This class was very interesting and the tests were fairly easy, but the papers (at least for me) were graded very harshly. You need to put in a lot of time and effort in order to get a good grade, so just be prepared for that. Your grade is mainly based on 2 papers. You first submit a draft, which is graded. Then you have a chance to edit and resubmit it, again for a grade. I really liked that aspect of the class, since you got direct and specific feedback! Overall, the class is great, just be prepared to spend a lot of time on the papers!!!

Selling the required text "Jerusalem: One city, Three Faiths" for $10. Email me at *************

I took this class as a GE course and I have to say that I liked it a lot. Professor Smoak is a nice guy who is willing to help his students any way he can. This quarter, for example, I wanted to take the class, but the class was over-enrolled, but he still gave me a PTE. The material itself is interesting to learn and Smoak makes sure to go over any uncertainties. While I did enjoy the class, I was not a fan of how much work this class required. This class had two quizzes, one midterm, one final, one group project, one research paper, participation, and a visit to LACMA. All of the exams were pretty straightforward. Professor Smoak would release a study guide that was useful for the exams. The annoying part about the class was the project, paper, and LACMA assignment. The group project is a gamble and your grade will depend on how well you work in a group. My group actually did stuff, so it was easy for me, but difficult for my peers. The LACMA assignment is inconvenient since you have to go all the way to LACMA on your own. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED. The paper is pretty short ( 4 to 5 pages), but it requires you to find 6 sources. Also, don't be deceived by the paper's brevity: it's much harder to be succinct! Overall, Smoak's class was pretty fun and he is a great lecturer; however, the number of assignments you have for this lower-division course definitely mars it from being an excellent class. Nonetheless, I would still recommend the course to anyone looking to fulfill their philosophical/linguistic GE requirement.