- Home
- Search
- Jessica Cattelino
- ANTHRO 3
AD
Based on 33 Users
TOP TAGS
There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Sorry, no enrollment data is available.
AD
I took this as a hopefully easy GE because it seemed interesting and let's just say I learned my lesson! Professor Cattelino is definitely a kind, funny, passionate, and truly knowledgeable professor, however the course is (in my opinion) not the easiest or best GE out there.
The grading breakdown was:
- Discussion Participation, 15% (you get one absence per quarter)
- Two 5-page Papers, 25% each
- Nine quizzes, 15%
- Final exam, 20%
- Minor extra credit from mid-quarter feedback form
The papers really stressed me out. I felt like the expectations from my TA were far higher than they should have been given our limited ethnographical writing experience, and I got docked for a lot of random things on the rubric (which was also really confusing). I went to my TA for help before the second paper and it was probably the most unhelpful conversation I have ever had in my life!
There are a LOT of readings to do, and I didn't really do them well, though it probably would have helped. They honestly were pretty interesting but this was my GE class and the amount of work was a lot in comparison to the 4 other STEM classes I was taking. The quizzes are mostly just about lecture and the readings though.
Lectures themselves were so long, and honestly most of the content felt like glorified common sense. Professor is really nice and asks questions but I honestly stopped going and started watching them on like 3x speed later on.
The final was difficult to gauge because she didn't give us any topics or study guide with the reasoning that part of good studying is figuring out what we needed to know by ourselves..... but it was not bad, definitely doable with studying key buzzwords (literally all I did) and the readings/specific situations and themes.
Averages for everything (papers and exams) were in the mid 80's. I got mid 90's for the second paper and final which is I think what pushed me into an A, but was fully expecting to not get an A. This was definitely a tough GE with very high expectations from my TA that made me feel really confused and defeated at times. I would take this if you have some sort of interest in the concepts, but then again I did too and here I am... :)
I would never take this class as a GE. Expect 60 pages of reading a week. I don't think the professor does a good job fleshing out concepts. She also provides you with no study guide even though lots of things are briefly talked about so it becomes hard to tell what to focus on. You can't get away with not reading.
First off, this was the course I used to determine on whether I wanted to pursue a minor in anthropology, and needless to say, I'm convinced. Professor Cattelino was great, and every reading was interesting.
I really enjoyed discussing topics in discussion during class, but felt like there was not enough of that. I feel as though it is easier to grasp concepts when people share their own experiences. I thought lectures were pretty engaging and full of great material.
Overall I really enjoyed this class. A lot of people said that there were too many readings, and while I agree that it was a lot (each week's readings took a good chunk of my weekend), they were almost all worth it. I thought that the essay prompts were kind of fun to write almost, and were very thought provoking.
I'm sure a lot of people liked this class, but for me it just wasn't it. I thought that a lot of the topics were very surface level and not explored in sufficient or satisfying amounts of depth.
Cattelino is a pretty organized professor, who regularly reaches out over email with announcements and assignment guidelines. The course is very easy, with weekly quizzes about the reading to check your knowledge. It did feel like the course was very general and sometimes self-explanatory if you've taken other humanities classes with themes about intersectionality, etc., however.
Professor Cattelino is very kind, considerate, and accommodating. The only assignments were weekly low-stakes quizzes (super easy as long as you pay attention to the lectures) which consisted of multiple choice questions and one short-response question (which may or may not rely on the readings for the week) and two term papers which were a little challenging to start, but the professor and TAs were very helpful and gave lots of feedback on how to write them. As someone who is not a social science major, I found this class to be an overwhelming amount of reading, but were usually thought provoking and interesting. In addition to the required texts for the course, a VPN is required for most readings. I would say the actual content of the course isn't difficult but the reading is dense.
Prof. Cattelino was amazing. Her lectures are very clear and interesting. Plus, she was very understanding of her students situations due to the pandemic and was open to extending deadlines for students who needed it. The weekly quizzes were not difficult and were great to just make sure you were absorbing the material in the lectures (almost all answers were literally in the lectures themselves). While the readings could be a little daunting, they were actually very interesting. I would 100% recommend anyone take this class.
An easy and interesting class if you do the readings and attend discussion actively. Professor Cattelino is so nice and very accommodating about classes being over zoom. Lectures were all recorded and quizzes were taken over a 12 hour time frame and open note. The two essays were not that much work and there were opportunities for extra credit.
Professor Cattelino is an amazing professor. Her lectures were extremely engaging, and I really enjoying learning about the different topics within the class. Additionally, she was super considerate of her students in the midst of the pandemic, from extending deadlines when needed to offering extra credit to help cushion our grades. The readings were pretty lengthy, and I didn't end up reading all of them, but I still felt pretty okay with the content as long as I watched the lectures. The discussions help immensely with learning the material, so I'd suggest going (and have at least 3-4 points ready to add). The weekly quizzes were really easy, the answers were in the lectures for the most part. I don't think the papers were too bad, I think as long as you keep up with the class lectures and familiarize yourself with 2 readings, you'll do good.
I took this class in my first quarter as a transfer and it was a great class. It was alot of work more than my two upper div classes but it is 5 units so makes sense. The professor was super understanding of difficulties what with being online and all the circumstances that came with it. I didn't always do the reading fully or I would skim it and make sure I had something I could add to the discussion sections. Go to section, it brought a lot of understanding to the readings, if I didn't really do the reading that week, I would make sure I took notes during section and those really helped when it came time ot write papers. There were only two papers total and weekly quizzes. Would 100% recommend great class, professor, and TAs.
I took this as a hopefully easy GE because it seemed interesting and let's just say I learned my lesson! Professor Cattelino is definitely a kind, funny, passionate, and truly knowledgeable professor, however the course is (in my opinion) not the easiest or best GE out there.
The grading breakdown was:
- Discussion Participation, 15% (you get one absence per quarter)
- Two 5-page Papers, 25% each
- Nine quizzes, 15%
- Final exam, 20%
- Minor extra credit from mid-quarter feedback form
The papers really stressed me out. I felt like the expectations from my TA were far higher than they should have been given our limited ethnographical writing experience, and I got docked for a lot of random things on the rubric (which was also really confusing). I went to my TA for help before the second paper and it was probably the most unhelpful conversation I have ever had in my life!
There are a LOT of readings to do, and I didn't really do them well, though it probably would have helped. They honestly were pretty interesting but this was my GE class and the amount of work was a lot in comparison to the 4 other STEM classes I was taking. The quizzes are mostly just about lecture and the readings though.
Lectures themselves were so long, and honestly most of the content felt like glorified common sense. Professor is really nice and asks questions but I honestly stopped going and started watching them on like 3x speed later on.
The final was difficult to gauge because she didn't give us any topics or study guide with the reasoning that part of good studying is figuring out what we needed to know by ourselves..... but it was not bad, definitely doable with studying key buzzwords (literally all I did) and the readings/specific situations and themes.
Averages for everything (papers and exams) were in the mid 80's. I got mid 90's for the second paper and final which is I think what pushed me into an A, but was fully expecting to not get an A. This was definitely a tough GE with very high expectations from my TA that made me feel really confused and defeated at times. I would take this if you have some sort of interest in the concepts, but then again I did too and here I am... :)
I would never take this class as a GE. Expect 60 pages of reading a week. I don't think the professor does a good job fleshing out concepts. She also provides you with no study guide even though lots of things are briefly talked about so it becomes hard to tell what to focus on. You can't get away with not reading.
First off, this was the course I used to determine on whether I wanted to pursue a minor in anthropology, and needless to say, I'm convinced. Professor Cattelino was great, and every reading was interesting.
I really enjoyed discussing topics in discussion during class, but felt like there was not enough of that. I feel as though it is easier to grasp concepts when people share their own experiences. I thought lectures were pretty engaging and full of great material.
Overall I really enjoyed this class. A lot of people said that there were too many readings, and while I agree that it was a lot (each week's readings took a good chunk of my weekend), they were almost all worth it. I thought that the essay prompts were kind of fun to write almost, and were very thought provoking.
I'm sure a lot of people liked this class, but for me it just wasn't it. I thought that a lot of the topics were very surface level and not explored in sufficient or satisfying amounts of depth.
Cattelino is a pretty organized professor, who regularly reaches out over email with announcements and assignment guidelines. The course is very easy, with weekly quizzes about the reading to check your knowledge. It did feel like the course was very general and sometimes self-explanatory if you've taken other humanities classes with themes about intersectionality, etc., however.
Professor Cattelino is very kind, considerate, and accommodating. The only assignments were weekly low-stakes quizzes (super easy as long as you pay attention to the lectures) which consisted of multiple choice questions and one short-response question (which may or may not rely on the readings for the week) and two term papers which were a little challenging to start, but the professor and TAs were very helpful and gave lots of feedback on how to write them. As someone who is not a social science major, I found this class to be an overwhelming amount of reading, but were usually thought provoking and interesting. In addition to the required texts for the course, a VPN is required for most readings. I would say the actual content of the course isn't difficult but the reading is dense.
Prof. Cattelino was amazing. Her lectures are very clear and interesting. Plus, she was very understanding of her students situations due to the pandemic and was open to extending deadlines for students who needed it. The weekly quizzes were not difficult and were great to just make sure you were absorbing the material in the lectures (almost all answers were literally in the lectures themselves). While the readings could be a little daunting, they were actually very interesting. I would 100% recommend anyone take this class.
An easy and interesting class if you do the readings and attend discussion actively. Professor Cattelino is so nice and very accommodating about classes being over zoom. Lectures were all recorded and quizzes were taken over a 12 hour time frame and open note. The two essays were not that much work and there were opportunities for extra credit.
Professor Cattelino is an amazing professor. Her lectures were extremely engaging, and I really enjoying learning about the different topics within the class. Additionally, she was super considerate of her students in the midst of the pandemic, from extending deadlines when needed to offering extra credit to help cushion our grades. The readings were pretty lengthy, and I didn't end up reading all of them, but I still felt pretty okay with the content as long as I watched the lectures. The discussions help immensely with learning the material, so I'd suggest going (and have at least 3-4 points ready to add). The weekly quizzes were really easy, the answers were in the lectures for the most part. I don't think the papers were too bad, I think as long as you keep up with the class lectures and familiarize yourself with 2 readings, you'll do good.
I took this class in my first quarter as a transfer and it was a great class. It was alot of work more than my two upper div classes but it is 5 units so makes sense. The professor was super understanding of difficulties what with being online and all the circumstances that came with it. I didn't always do the reading fully or I would skim it and make sure I had something I could add to the discussion sections. Go to section, it brought a lot of understanding to the readings, if I didn't really do the reading that week, I would make sure I took notes during section and those really helped when it came time ot write papers. There were only two papers total and weekly quizzes. Would 100% recommend great class, professor, and TAs.
Based on 33 Users
TOP TAGS
There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.