Jianwei Miao
Department of Physics
AD
2.3
Overall Rating
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 2.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.7 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.7 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Needs Textbook
  • Engaging Lectures
  • Useful Textbooks
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Snazzy Dresser
  • Often Funny
  • Tough Tests
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
15.4%
12.8%
10.3%
7.7%
5.1%
2.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2019
Grade: NR
Jan. 28, 2020

This class was bad for everyone involved. It was his first time teaching phys17, and it went terribly. Super nice guy, very smart and friendly, just couldn’t quite find out a way to properly explain the concepts to the class in such a way that we could understand. We took 2 midterms, and a final, and the average score was a failing grade every time. First midterm average was 37/60, second was 34/60, and the final average was a 60%.

Overall, physics 17 might be an easier class with another professor, and I think the main reason it went so bad for everyone is because he was so used to teaching upper division complicated QM, that when it came to teaching us, he sort of implied we understood it. The midterms were very hard, as was the final.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2019
Grade: NR
Jan. 28, 2020

This class was bad for everyone involved. It was his first time teaching phys17, and it went terribly. Super nice guy, very smart and friendly, just couldn’t quite find out a way to properly explain the concepts to the class in such a way that we could understand. We took 2 midterms, and a final, and the average score was a failing grade every time. First midterm average was 37/60, second was 34/60, and the final average was a 60%.

Overall, physics 17 might be an easier class with another professor, and I think the main reason it went so bad for everyone is because he was so used to teaching upper division complicated QM, that when it came to teaching us, he sort of implied we understood it. The midterms were very hard, as was the final.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.3
Overall Rating
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 2.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.7 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.7 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (1)
  • Needs Textbook
    (1)
  • Engaging Lectures
    (1)
  • Useful Textbooks
    (1)
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
    (1)
  • Snazzy Dresser
    (1)
  • Often Funny
    (1)
  • Tough Tests
    (1)
ADS

Report Review

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!