Johannes Klaus Baeumler
Department of Mathematics
AD
1.0
Overall Rating
Based on 2 Users
Easiness 3.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 1.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 1.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Tough Tests
  • Participation Matters
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Winter 2024
Grade: A-
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
March 25, 2024

This is one of the worst upper div math classes I have ever taken. I have no idea why it existed. The class goes into meaninglessly tedious details that will not be used in any other upper-division math classes--including graduate courses. The useful contents can literally be finished in 2 weeks.

The grading is HARSH. Those who get 95%+ get an A, and he decides who gets an A+, not based on grades. He posts no lecture notes, no extra materials, no past/practice questions, no grade distribution(not even mean and median), no nothing. They take points off your exams and hw questions just because your notations do not match his, even if your entire calculation is correct. Plus, he would never tell us the grade cutoffs until one of my classmates asked him.

He does not know how to be a teacher. his lectures are kinda shit. His first midterm was extremely easy, and the second one was then way too much...

I am done talking more about this professor. Just run.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Winter 2024
Grade: A-
March 25, 2024

This is one of the worst upper div math classes I have ever taken. I have no idea why it existed. The class goes into meaninglessly tedious details that will not be used in any other upper-division math classes--including graduate courses. The useful contents can literally be finished in 2 weeks.

The grading is HARSH. Those who get 95%+ get an A, and he decides who gets an A+, not based on grades. He posts no lecture notes, no extra materials, no past/practice questions, no grade distribution(not even mean and median), no nothing. They take points off your exams and hw questions just because your notations do not match his, even if your entire calculation is correct. Plus, he would never tell us the grade cutoffs until one of my classmates asked him.

He does not know how to be a teacher. his lectures are kinda shit. His first midterm was extremely easy, and the second one was then way too much...

I am done talking more about this professor. Just run.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
1.0
Overall Rating
Based on 2 Users
Easiness 3.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 1.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 1.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Tough Tests
    (2)
  • Participation Matters
    (2)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!