The other reviews are pretty accurate. He is super paranoid of cheating. The weekly reading quizzes stress you out and though he tells us to read for general themes and stories, his quiz questions have literally asked about a person who was mentioned for not more than 2 sentences out of hundreds of pages of reading. The midterm and final are somehow more lax, but the grading is subjective and variable. The class was bruincasted, but the lectures are dry, monotone, and not engaging. He tries to help students out and seems to genuinely care about their success and tries to curve his grades as best as he can but it always comes off as confusing, complex, and unnecessary. It's somehow kind of manageable, but definitely not a class I would want to take again and wouldn't recommend unless it's like the only one left to fulfill your requirements.

This has been one of my favorite classes here. Would absolutely recommend if you're interested in the subject. The reading can get pretty heavy, but it's pretty well selected, some can get dry/long. I'd recommend taking with a friend and splitting it/reviewing it together otherwise it'll take hours. Quizzes are easy if you are familiar with the reading, but because Zaller was paranoid about cheating, the quizzes were taken synchronously and pretty pressed for time. You can skip two of them/drop your two lowest grades.

He really emphasizes writing straight to the point, which forces you to be brief. Both the midterm and the final (24 hr essays) were expected to have absolutely no fluff if you wanted to maximize your points. He's a chiller in office hours, come with at least one question. He really wants you to do well and is retiring soon so take him while you can! Opportunities to get involved after the class exist too.

Zaller was very worried about cheating and gives very little time to complete quizzes which have very specific questions from the readings. I found the readings to be really interesting and the quizzes manageable to get a good score on if you do all the readings and take really detailed notes. This is what I did and I only missed one quiz question for the whole quarter, got a 95 on the midterm, and an A in the class. People complained a lot about Zaller but it’s really not that hard to get an A as long as you’re willing to put in the work. The professor seems tough but he’s actually really nice and passionate about what he’s teaching.

Professor Zaller is a really smart guy, but his lectures are really boring. The workload (readings) is really heavy for PS 142A, and you have to do them. He assigns weekly reading quizzes and the questions are extremely specific, so if you don't do the readings or just skim them, your grade will drop pretty quickly. Overall, I learned a fair amount about American political parties in his class, so that's cool. If you're interested in elections and political parties, by all means definitely take this class. But if you have the chance to take a different class, you'd probably be doing yourself a favor.

He is a very smart man. Look up his UCLA theory of parties. However, that being said, his lectures are very dry. They are podcasted though, so that helps because you can listen to the podcasts on a faster speed. I found his lectures to be kind of irrelevant to the midterms or finals. There is a LOT of reading and a reading quiz every week. However, the TAs grade based on if they think you read it, rather than having the exact answer. It is an easy A, but be prepared to not learn a lot and do the readings!

The material in this class is fascinating, but I found Professor Zaller's delivery in lecture to be very dry, bordering on boring sometimes. He is quick-witted and gives strong, although blunt, responses to questions from students.

The most important part of this class is the outside material – he gives weekly quizzes on the readings that are fairly easy as long as you've actually done the reading. What's more, you will need to draw heavily from the readings for your in-class midterm and final exam which take the form of a timed essay on a single question related to the course. If you do the reading and show up to class at least most of the time, you should have no problem in this course.

The central focus of the class is the UCLA theory of political parties, and Zaller spends a great deal of the class attempting to get us to agree with the theory. I found his perspective and the theory to be very interesting, which made the class one I think I will remember for a long time.

His class was great and informative overall. There was an average of 100 pages of reading per week and there was a weekly quiz on the assigned readings and a quiz on the material of the lectures every 2-3 lectures. Quizzes came out to 40% of the grade. They were graded by student graders that gave you full points if you were anywhere near the answer thought. His lectures can be boring in person as he talks quite slowly and monotone, but he doesn't mind if you leave class after the quizzes. Just watch the lecture on bruincast at 2x speed. The midterm (25% of the grade) and final (35%) are both in-class essays that are graded by including as many pieces of evidence as possible. Your paper doesn't have to be fully coherent, you just have to include 'building blocks' from a sheet that he gives you. He gave 7% of extra credit which was substantial and super helpful! I enjoyed the content of his lectures as he is very knowledgeable. The information was broken down into four categories: political parties and democracy (overview of the nature of parties and their history in the United States from 1787 to the present), parties in the electorate, parties nominations to office, and the party in the government. He tries to be bipartisan but openly admits his left of center preferences. I would recommend this class.

To be completely honest, his class is boring. And I mean it. He talks super slow and likes to walk around. However, he does offer Bruincast, and if you speed it up to 2x, his class suddenly becomes a lot more interesting.

The course material is very interesting and engaging as well. I loved the assigned readings, especially "The Righteous Mind" by Jonathan Haidt. This book is one of the most interesting books I have ever read in my life, more than how I liked Harry Potter. Honestly recommend it even if you choose not to take his class.

He actually taught us a lot, about partisanship, and how people who we think are stupid, are not actually stupid, because we are equally stupid in their eyes. All his grades are being graded by undergraduate TAs, which are not the most enlightened people. You have weekly quizzes, and if you basically write something that is close to the answer, they'll give you full grade. I mean I love it for them grading like this, but it doesn't feel good when I study so much harder than my friends but they got the same grade as I am without even reading.

My friends thought they didn't learn anything new from this class, and it can be true. However, the thing that struck me the most is how he described partisanship and analyzed both sides' resentment. I would take his class again. Preferably with the same TA and the same grading standard.

Got a B on the midterm but somehow salvaged my grade with the final. He let us change the weight of the midterm on the day of the final which was sooo generous. The quizzes are easy if you pay attention to the details of the story rather than the main messages of the story. Just read and re-read everything and you should be good!

Very informative professor, who definitely knows what he's talking about. Readings were long, but some of it was material that you probably wouldn't find anywhere outside of his course reader. One of the weeks readings was audio of Zaller interviewing a political 'king maker' who controls Louisiana's congressmen and in it he explains how he's able to wire money to candidates to by pass election finance rules.

Every week there's a quiz on the reading and lecture, but they are pretty easy, just skim your notes on previous lectures or readings (Most people got 100% on all of them). Most lecture quizzes are based on whatever chart or diagram he presented in class previously. These make up like 40% or something of your grade, so it makes doing the readings important. The 2 big readings are Acts of Congress and The Righteous Mind (only parts 1 and 2 of RM)- I'd recommend finding the audio books of these 2 in advance cause they're pretty long reads.

There is 1 midterm and 1 final that are about 60% of the grade and are both essays. Zaller has a weird grading system that's constantly changing, so it's a little hard to keep up with it. The core concept (as of when I had him, he may change it again) is that he assigns 'points' for every concept you mention in your essay, (Our class the highest points a person got was 70 'points', but most people got like 40). Then he'll choose the essay he thinks is the lowest 'A level paper', and that paper's point number becomes the dividing line between who's assigned an A and who gets a A- or below. It's kinda a weird subjective curve, but most people seemed to do ok with it. Main point, during the midterm/final, just keep writing as much as you can.

Extra credit is provided based off if his graduate students need any social experiments done on his undergrads. Super easy points, for my class made up 7% of our grade, but it fluctuates per class.

Over all fun class, bit of work, but over all learned a LOT about our party system.