Jonathan Hopkins
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
AD
4.7
Overall Rating
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 3.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.7 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.3 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Has Group Projects
  • Uses Slides
  • Tough Tests
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
18.2%
15.2%
12.1%
9.1%
6.1%
3.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

27.9%
23.2%
18.6%
13.9%
9.3%
4.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

43.6%
36.4%
29.1%
21.8%
14.5%
7.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (3)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Winter 2023
Grade: A
April 13, 2023

Very clear lectures and very interesting material. He basically invented this field of study and he is young so he knows how to teach it well. It's a lot of 3D visualizing systems rather than doing math. 5 homeworks that aren't too hard, but need to be turned in as a hard copy on time or else you get no credit. Involves MATLAB and SolidWorks. The midterm was good. Final was brutal and only covered the last couple weeks of material (average 62). He doesn't usually curve but he had to for this one. The group project was interesting and fun to complete. This quarter, we designed and built a toy for Kinder eggs and he got a representative from the company to watch our presentations. I would take the course again since he is entertaining, there's not much math, and the content seems important for the future of design.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2022
Grade: A
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
March 31, 2022

Lectures are prerecorded. There were also in person lectures for extra practice problems, and in person project meetings with the prof. Weekly HWs, 2 exams, and 1 project. Exam 1 was okay and exam 2 was difficult but curved. Going over all the practice problems he gives is probably enough to get an A. The project this year was a bit crazy - 20+ person groups. Hopkins himself said it's unideal but he can only handle 7 or so projects for the entire class. Projects were pretty interesting, but a lot of the group ended up doing very little. Overall workload is not too bad in comparison to other mechE classes.

The class material is pretty interesting. Professor Hopkins actually created much of the stuff he's teaching, so he lectures on it well. I would def recommend this class as an elective, very interesting and not too hard.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2022
Grade: A-
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
March 9, 2022

Prerecorded lectures, great explanations in class, lots of helpful example problems and tests can be difficult but if you went to class and did the homeworks, there are no curveballs, so I thought the questions were very fair. Compliant mechanisms are soon going to be absolutely everywhere in mechanical design, so I highly recommend this class as Hopkins is a world-class researcher in this rapidly developing field.

However, having 19 to 38 people per final project group made it a gigantic mess, and only a handful of students actually did any work. It was so logistically complicated and overwhelming, it made the last few weeks of this course unbearable. If it wasn't for the final project, this class would be an overall 5/5 without a doubt.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2023
Grade: A
April 13, 2023

Very clear lectures and very interesting material. He basically invented this field of study and he is young so he knows how to teach it well. It's a lot of 3D visualizing systems rather than doing math. 5 homeworks that aren't too hard, but need to be turned in as a hard copy on time or else you get no credit. Involves MATLAB and SolidWorks. The midterm was good. Final was brutal and only covered the last couple weeks of material (average 62). He doesn't usually curve but he had to for this one. The group project was interesting and fun to complete. This quarter, we designed and built a toy for Kinder eggs and he got a representative from the company to watch our presentations. I would take the course again since he is entertaining, there's not much math, and the content seems important for the future of design.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Winter 2022
Grade: A
March 31, 2022

Lectures are prerecorded. There were also in person lectures for extra practice problems, and in person project meetings with the prof. Weekly HWs, 2 exams, and 1 project. Exam 1 was okay and exam 2 was difficult but curved. Going over all the practice problems he gives is probably enough to get an A. The project this year was a bit crazy - 20+ person groups. Hopkins himself said it's unideal but he can only handle 7 or so projects for the entire class. Projects were pretty interesting, but a lot of the group ended up doing very little. Overall workload is not too bad in comparison to other mechE classes.

The class material is pretty interesting. Professor Hopkins actually created much of the stuff he's teaching, so he lectures on it well. I would def recommend this class as an elective, very interesting and not too hard.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Winter 2022
Grade: A-
March 9, 2022

Prerecorded lectures, great explanations in class, lots of helpful example problems and tests can be difficult but if you went to class and did the homeworks, there are no curveballs, so I thought the questions were very fair. Compliant mechanisms are soon going to be absolutely everywhere in mechanical design, so I highly recommend this class as Hopkins is a world-class researcher in this rapidly developing field.

However, having 19 to 38 people per final project group made it a gigantic mess, and only a handful of students actually did any work. It was so logistically complicated and overwhelming, it made the last few weeks of this course unbearable. If it wasn't for the final project, this class would be an overall 5/5 without a doubt.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
4.7
Overall Rating
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 3.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.7 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.3 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Has Group Projects
    (3)
  • Uses Slides
    (2)
  • Tough Tests
    (2)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!