*Online Version*

The class did not have homework and the final grade was totally based on midterm and final grades (I don't remember is there a 10% participation or not).

Since there was no homework, I haven't watched any lecture videos before the midterms, which is not recommended. The midterm was hard because the time is limited.

The final is also hard, but easier than the final since the time duration is longer for the final.

i think he probably grades easier now after looking at past reviews. the key to this class is to simply sit down and do every single past exam question, discussion question, and lecture question. his exams are pretty identical to those. he did generously curve, which i think maybe he didn't in the past. he knows people don't like him and i don't think he cares. i think he's a snob who doesn't care about his students and can be very condescending. so that made the class very unenjoyable for me but it may not to others. it's nice to not have homework but it pretty much makes everyone cram and learn at the end (all exams are week 7 onwards). grading is 25% MT1 week 7, 25% MT2 week 10, and 50% final. having MT2 during week 10 is ass but you get over it. it's basically another final but just on game theory. the material itself isn't hard, but just try to understand the steps of everything and you should be fine. his recorded lectures and practice problems is really all you need to do/can do. discussions were pointless for me i just sat there and did the worksheet myself since my TA was really slow. live lectures were just office hours and those were helpful a couple times if i needed to ask something. mostly it was going over exam questions. TLDR: if there's someone better take that, but you'll be fine in this class otherwise. no workload just exams.

Prof. Vogel ‘s 101 can be fairly easy provided that you have a good understanding of multivariable calculus. But his 101 can be really challenging if Math is your weakness. The exams have only three or four questions with no multiple choice, so you just need to understand the main idea of the course without paying lots of attention to the specifics. But you do need to be utterly carfeful writing your answers considering the small number of questions ( boundary solutions, case by case analysis , etc).

He is my PERSONAL favorite. He gives engaging lectures, he is super smart and balding.

Really hard tests. Midterm 1 and 2 Average 72. Final Average 60. Good Lecturer, recorded lectures. he makes the tests really hard to cope that he is bald.

Coming from a math/econ major, but Vogel was absolutely phenomenal. He made the content of 101 engaging and interesting, but never forgot the larger picture, often making remarks of the plausibility of certain theories or applications of theory into real life cases. There is also no homework, and Vogel freely gives out all past exams, which resemble those on the actual tests fairly well, however he likes to give some unique questions just to test your overall/high-level understanding. Plus, he’s just a really down to earth guy and pretty funny.

The class itself I’d say is for everyone to learn, but how it’s structured may not be for everyone. He will likely use scantron tests, has a Week 10 midterm, and those who like homework to keep track of how you’re doing may struggle. But overall, I still highly recommend as my interest in econ grew a lot more.

my grade is more reflective about the fact that i rarely did practice problems rather than professor vogel being a bad instructor, however, i do think the way he structured the class and taught material was very ridiculous. the first midterm was free-response which really helped me pick up partial credit but due to a small misgrade that forced him to go back and fix certain mistakes he decided to make both the second midterm and final multiple choice (he did that purely because he was so inconvenienced by the mistake). the fact that the second midterm was scheduled on the last day of class was so stressful! he also taught content in a very convoluted way that was not the way most professors taught it. all that being said, he curved GENEROUSLY as other reviews have said. i got a 76 on MT 1, 55 on MT 2, and 49 on the final which brought me to a raw 60%, but he curved it up to a C. i still don't know how the fuck that happened but i'm extremely grateful for that 🙏 overall not the best professor but you'll pass doing the bare minimum and do great if you have a better work ethic than me!!

Vogel is by no means a bad professor. He is pretty clear, organized, and sometimes funny. Note that there will be no homework or practice, but he gives out all past exams and examples in his lecture are useful. If you are reading the reviews from 2018, they are not really a good indicator of his lecture today. Vogel's exam format has improved A LOT in recent years. In 2018 he made one question worth 65 points but exams in recent years definitely become more reasonable. I can confidently say he is one of the better professors in the econ department.

Vogel's a stud. His tests suck, but that's UCLA's biz econ weeder courses for you. He was a great lecturer; you can tell he's wicked smart, plus he's funny. This has been my favorite econ course so far because the concepts are more applicable to real life, and his teaching style is engaging.
I had to go away for a week mid quarter, and he was supper accommodating in terms of zooming his lectures, as well as recording and posting them for me to go back and review.
If you want an good grade, do his practice tests... over and over. He posts all past midterms and finals, so there's pretty much endless materials to review, and they look almost exactly like his real tests (not including the curve balls he likes to throw). Overall would definitely take this class again, and don't think you'll find many better econ professors at UCLA.

Professor Vogel is a gem of the econ department. His lectures stand out among the department like a shining star amidst the drab, light-polluted sky that is notorious for curving down. He is both passionate and clear—both in terms of how he lectures content, and how he communicates expectations and procedures of the class. Meaning, he is always prepared with real life examples to contextualize course concepts in a tangible way. He loves a tangent which is great for lecture both because they can be fun to listen to and also because it gives you a break from having to listen intently to the whole lecture and you can tune out for a few minutes. He also is occasionally known for interactive demonstrations which seem to be only vaguely related to course concepts but he really seems to have fun with them nonetheless, so who am I to question it. Vogel seems to have a strong understanding of his audience, and can generally tell when to slow things down for confusing concepts, and just generally knows what college students want—like to know specifically what is going to be on each exam. Speaking of his exams, they are incredibly fair. He posts numerous past exams to study from, including rubrics which show that he's generous with partial credit. There are no problem sets for this class, so the workload is essentially 0 every week, fantastic. But the week leading up to midterm 1, 2, and the final—maybe clear your schedule and move to Powell.

A minor note about the way Vogel structures class is that discussion section is weird. Pretty highly dependent on your TA in terms of what they cover and how they do it, and discussion can often feel like taking a completely different class than what we're doing in lecture. Ultimately, I didn't feel like this was a super consequential factor in the grand scheme of the class, but was a little disorienting in the first few weeks.

Simply put, Vogel is an inviting professor that is passionate about the subject and his students' success. He genuinely seems excited to be at each lecture, and has a lighthearted and engaging lecture style without being patronizing. This mundane major class turned out to be one of my favorite classes I've taken at UCLA to date.

Vogel is a very funny guy, and his lectures are fun. However, I didn't really enjoy his class. He doesn't give any homework at all, which sounds nice but is actually frustrating because it means you have to study way more for each midterm/final. Also, he decides to give the second midterm on the very last day of class, which ostensibly helps you study for the final, but really just convolutes things. Maybe this is more of a problem with the material of the class, but the problems just suck to actually complete. They aren't that difficult, but often involve really dense mathematical computation where lots can go wrong on a purely computational front. And he is quite stingy with partial credit, making this even worse. On the first midterm, there was a 9 pt question where I did all of the work exactly correctly, and then accidentally wrote down the answer the wrong way at the very end, and lost all the points. I'm fairly sure this mistake alone was the difference between an A- and A for me, but so it goes.