- Home
- Search
- Joseph Esdin
- LIFESCI 7C
AD
Based on 66 Users
TOP TAGS
- Uses Slides
- Engaging Lectures
- Participation Matters
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Sorry, no enrollment data is available.
AD
Honestly love this Professor. I'm sure by the many other comments posted you can hear in detail how great of a lecturer he is. He's pretty funny and really wants you to absorb the material through a balance of clicker questions and conceptual slides. Overall, it is structured similarly to the other classes in the LS7 series, but if you like physiology then you're going to love this class.
The material overall is much denser than LS7A and LS7B so you need to have better organization if you want to complete the material ahead of time (ie: launchpad ). That being said since everything was recorded you could easily catch up if you're behind.
Exams: Because of COVID they changed the structure of the exams slightly. The midterms were timed 120 minutes each, around 45 multiple choice questions, worth 2 points each (90 points), and conceptually based on weeks 1-3 for midterm 1 and 4-6 for midterm 2. After each midterm, we had an "exam wrapper" which basically was a chance to get 8 points back on your exam grade by answering a series of questions reflective of what was most missed on each midterm.
The final was timed 150 minutes, 82 multiple choice questions, worth 2.25 points each (meaning you could earn 184.5 out of 180 points). The final was 60% new material ie: weeks 7-10, and 40% review material ie: weeks 1-6. I honestly thought the final was much easier than the midterms, but there was no exam wrapper.
Discussion: Discussions were very helpful! The only issue was that it was sometimes really hard the finish the whole worksheet within the discussion and I spent some time outside of the discussion to finish my responses. But besides that, the TAs were actually amazing.
Other: Just remember to do launchpad to get those assignment points and go to CLC sessions and PLF sessions if you can.
If you're reading this far into the future, this information will probably/hopefully be applicable to you. For those of you that are taking LS7C in summer or fall 2020, good luck.
Esdin was a wonderful professor. He always explained everything thoroughly, gave us time to think about questions, and never failed to answer any question during office hours.
You've likely taken LS 7B so you know all about the Launchpad, participation, difficult exams, etc. As for the changes made during this quarter due to remote learning:
Lectures: Unlike Khankan, Esdin decided to prerecord his lectures and post them on CCLE instead. This prevented us from asking questions during lecture, but this was fine because there was so much material to cover this quarter that all the questions probably would have slowed us down. On the other hand, Esdin still wanted to simulate an actual class environment so he would stop talking for a couple minutes during each clicker question. This was kind of awkward, but didn't bother any of us much, and I just fast-forwarded through the waiting time after I had worked out the answer.
Participation/Clickers: Since we couldn't physically all be in the same class, we took a VERY short (like 2 questions) multiple choice quiz on CCLE after watching each lecture that day. The quizzes opened 50 minutes after lectures were posted and closed at 10:50 PM that day, so you had to watch lecture to answer the questions. I'm pretty sure it wasn't graded on correctness, but we were still given two attempts.
Launchpad: Identical format to LS 7B. Points come from the small quizzes and PEQ. Just power through it, because each week is about a new body system and there's A LOT of information. You got this!!
Discussion: Each discussion session was on Zoom, and we had online worksheets through Gradescope. We would split up into breakout rooms of 4-5 to work on the assignment. Some of the worksheets were super short, but sometimes they took the entire time to finish. It all depends on your TA and Zoom breakout room of course.
CLC: Since everything was online, I took advantage of my time and went to a CLC session each week. This was particularly helpful for the midterm (and would've been for the final). We would just screen share and work on the worksheet shared to the group, and we worked in Zoom breakout rooms.
Midterms/Final: The first midterm was a little challenging, because unlike LS 7A&B, we were introduced to free response questions on Gradescope. We were also given 50 minutes to do 6 FRQs which was not enough time. We had about 30 multiple choice questions on CCLE with 1 hour to do them. It was difficult to finish the free response, so we were given a full hour during the second midterm. If you studied everything from Launchpad, your notes, discussion worksheets, and CLC as much as you can, then you should be okay, just don't freak out if confusing questions arise. You should know by know that's just how the LS series rolls. Due to the protests and just the general chaos of the world, the final was an automatic 100% for everyone!! Thank goodness, because genome browser during the last three weeks of the quarter was stressful and I was burnt out by that point.
ESDIN: As a lecturer, Esdin always took his time to explain everything, which was helpful of course. I ended up speeding the video up 1.5x just as a personal preference. I didn't go to Esdin's office hours often, but when I did I always learned something new and it was a pleasant vibe.
Course topics/studying tips: There was so much information to cover that you have to read Launchpad thoroughly to fully grasp everything though. This isn't like LS 7A; you have to prepare for concepts. I took IB Bio HL 2 in high school and honestly the topics were VERY similar so I feel like that preparation helped me and encouraged me throughout the quarter. A full list of information we went over includes: cell communication, nervous system, endocrine system, motor/muscle systems, cardiovascular and pulmonary systems, excretory and digestive systems, immune system, and another three weeks of Genome Browser stuff. What I did to maintain my sanity each week, stop myself from drowning in stress, and just to organize information so I could remember everything was: doing the pre-class worksheets posted on CCLE each week, making flashcards of all the learning objectives with diagrams and detailed info, doing Launchpad early/basically as soon as it was posted so I had time to study and absorb information without rushing it the night before, taking thorough notes of definitions and new info and adding to them during lecture, and checking campuswire and groupme for updates and questions.
Professor Esdin is a really great professor. He's supportive and accommodating to his students, and really wants everybody to succeed. His jokes made online school a bit less boring. He is a clear lecturer and I recommend taking him or Khankan. The midterms, like the entire LS series, are poorly worded and can easily confuse you. Be careful taking the exams, and make sure you really understand the concepts. Also, he didn't mention it in class (its in the syllabus), but its possible to earn a few points extra credit by helping people on Campuswire.
This professor is great and very thorough. Pay attention to lectures and just do the pre-class reading guides to not spend all your time on launchpad. I would say the clickers for this class very a bit easier than what you would see on the actual tests. The 7 series tests were always terrible though.
I liked the content of the class a lot and a many things taught in this course was material many people haven't been exposed to. Professor Esdin is very clear with lecture content and is super engaging! BUT, as you may know, this is part of the LS7 series; there's always something that's gotta be wrong with the class. In this case, it was the exams. I prayed a few days before midterms and the final that the wording was going to be clear, but nope. The wording on the midterms were extremely ambiguous and needlessly tedious to understand, as a result, people often wasted time trying to even comprehend the horrific questions. The final was not terrible however. My recommendation is to read exam problems VERY carefully since supposedly they "don't try to trick you" but really they do. Also, go over in class diagrams and discussion concepts, these two are very important since they will show up on exams. Good luck taking this class!
I hated 7B so much, but this class was infinitely better. It was interesting, and the first 7 weeks were really fun to learn about. I loved my TA Zac, and my discussion was small, so we were able to ask questions and dive deeper into the material. The LA CLC sessions are also super helpful, so I definitely recommend.
As always, Launchpad is annoying, and only slightly helpful. To study, I made one page study guides for each chapter and went over clickers. For each test, I studied the night before and it was sufficient.
My class was joint with Cooper, and he wasn't as engaging as Esdin, but still a good professor.
I believe our class was curved by 1% which bumped me up a grade.
Overall, I would recommend these professors, but as we all know your professor doesn't matter much for the 7 series.
***THIS WRITTEN REVIEW IS STRICTLY FOR JULIE MARTINEZ (TA)***
I literally can not believe how this TA screwed over my grade. She took off points every single week, on every discussion worksheet, off of answers that I would completely base off of her short presentations and slides AND what she would say to me when my break out room would call her in. She looks for VERY specific words -> if you don't include it, automatic 7/8 or less. She ended up dropping my grade a letter grade and it did not get better over the ten weeks. AVOID THIS TA AT ALL COSTS. She seems really nice but literally will not cut you any slack. When I asked her how I could improve, all she basically said was to use more specific words(??) and to try harder(??) I've always scored 100% in discussion for 7A and 7B but this TA really was not it.
**7C RANT WARNING: Professor Esdin was an amazing teacher. I would recommend him over the other 7C professors for sure. Always funny and engaging, great knowledgeable and personable man, very clearly explaining the slides, and understanding of students and willing to help ---- when possible. I say when possible because this class f-ing sucks and sometimes he himself had no idea what the hell was going on - I'll explain later in my rant. This rant is about 7C, not Esdin.
I have never been able to say that my blood pressure raises by 40 mmHg just by thinking back to my experience of a class, until this class. Jesus Christ please be prepared for the worst class of your life. Whoever created the curriculum for 7C deserves a life sentence in prison because I have never felt such a LACK of guidance and clarity in a class.
For starters, a usual 7 series lab discussion is a time for learning and explanation of the subjects being taught in lecture. For some reason, 7C does not allow TAs or LAs to give you the answers to like anything, especially what's going on in lab discussion. BRUHHHHH. HOW TF AM I SUPPOSED TO LEARN????
Next, be aware of the tests. I somehow did well, way above average actually, which for the first midterm was rumored to be in the 40s. Still, they made me want to kill myself and whoever wrote them. I kid you not, every single question was so unclear that they were testing your ability to fucking read the test writer's mind at this point. They could all be interpreted to make sense for each answer choice, which mind you was pretty much either true or false 90% of the time. Yeah....
No knowledge based testing, purely your ability to reason through a logical hellhole with those double-double-double-negative phrased questions they love to ask.
About Esdin having no idea what he is talking about sometimes: One time students asked him about a wacky ass problem solving session question that was one of these logical mind-reading stupidity ones, and he literally could not figure it out for himself. I mean WHAT THE FUCK ARE WE DOING HERE if the professor can't even understand the curriculum?? Poor guy, who is very intelligent mind you, has no clue what is going on because of the idiots that made this series.
They had to curve the class because everyone did so terribly. This quarter they decided to make the tests webcam and then in person, and boy they must have known they fucked up. When they initially made the class online before and switched it this quarter, I'm sure they thought everyone was going to be frolicking in a meadow or something, because they did not adjust for the unspoken of "collaboration" that was going on under the rug beforehand, and everyone did so poorly. Don't get me wrong, this speaks to the incompetence of many students as well, and was a necessary step to take. But the class is so bad, that it was taken too far.
So yeah, take Esdin because he is the guy who will take the singular straw off your back so that it doesn't break with all the rest of the horrible shit in this class (reference to straw that broke the camel's back). But be prepared.... *ominous music*
The required work, such as exams, was far more difficult than what was taught in class. The instructors barely explained anything and instead relied heavily on iClicker questions without actually teaching the concepts. What’s even worse is that if a student couldn’t score above 75% on the iClicker questions during the lecture (when the concepts were being introduced for the first time), they would lose attendance points.
I really like Dr. Esdin. He knew the material well and taught clearly and concisely. However, I found that unlike the other 7 series classes, 7C's Iclickers weren't similar to the tests. Honestly, the tests felt like reading comprehensions to trick the student rather than actually teaching on the material we learned. I feel like the tests weren't specific in the wording of the questions so multiple answers could be the correct ones. They were frustrating. That being said, just based on the lectures, Esdin was a great, understanding professor. He is also funny, so go to lectures, they are worth it. I enjoyed learning about our body's systems, it was a really cool class for someone who has never taken physiology in high school.
Honestly love this Professor. I'm sure by the many other comments posted you can hear in detail how great of a lecturer he is. He's pretty funny and really wants you to absorb the material through a balance of clicker questions and conceptual slides. Overall, it is structured similarly to the other classes in the LS7 series, but if you like physiology then you're going to love this class.
The material overall is much denser than LS7A and LS7B so you need to have better organization if you want to complete the material ahead of time (ie: launchpad ). That being said since everything was recorded you could easily catch up if you're behind.
Exams: Because of COVID they changed the structure of the exams slightly. The midterms were timed 120 minutes each, around 45 multiple choice questions, worth 2 points each (90 points), and conceptually based on weeks 1-3 for midterm 1 and 4-6 for midterm 2. After each midterm, we had an "exam wrapper" which basically was a chance to get 8 points back on your exam grade by answering a series of questions reflective of what was most missed on each midterm.
The final was timed 150 minutes, 82 multiple choice questions, worth 2.25 points each (meaning you could earn 184.5 out of 180 points). The final was 60% new material ie: weeks 7-10, and 40% review material ie: weeks 1-6. I honestly thought the final was much easier than the midterms, but there was no exam wrapper.
Discussion: Discussions were very helpful! The only issue was that it was sometimes really hard the finish the whole worksheet within the discussion and I spent some time outside of the discussion to finish my responses. But besides that, the TAs were actually amazing.
Other: Just remember to do launchpad to get those assignment points and go to CLC sessions and PLF sessions if you can.
If you're reading this far into the future, this information will probably/hopefully be applicable to you. For those of you that are taking LS7C in summer or fall 2020, good luck.
Esdin was a wonderful professor. He always explained everything thoroughly, gave us time to think about questions, and never failed to answer any question during office hours.
You've likely taken LS 7B so you know all about the Launchpad, participation, difficult exams, etc. As for the changes made during this quarter due to remote learning:
Lectures: Unlike Khankan, Esdin decided to prerecord his lectures and post them on CCLE instead. This prevented us from asking questions during lecture, but this was fine because there was so much material to cover this quarter that all the questions probably would have slowed us down. On the other hand, Esdin still wanted to simulate an actual class environment so he would stop talking for a couple minutes during each clicker question. This was kind of awkward, but didn't bother any of us much, and I just fast-forwarded through the waiting time after I had worked out the answer.
Participation/Clickers: Since we couldn't physically all be in the same class, we took a VERY short (like 2 questions) multiple choice quiz on CCLE after watching each lecture that day. The quizzes opened 50 minutes after lectures were posted and closed at 10:50 PM that day, so you had to watch lecture to answer the questions. I'm pretty sure it wasn't graded on correctness, but we were still given two attempts.
Launchpad: Identical format to LS 7B. Points come from the small quizzes and PEQ. Just power through it, because each week is about a new body system and there's A LOT of information. You got this!!
Discussion: Each discussion session was on Zoom, and we had online worksheets through Gradescope. We would split up into breakout rooms of 4-5 to work on the assignment. Some of the worksheets were super short, but sometimes they took the entire time to finish. It all depends on your TA and Zoom breakout room of course.
CLC: Since everything was online, I took advantage of my time and went to a CLC session each week. This was particularly helpful for the midterm (and would've been for the final). We would just screen share and work on the worksheet shared to the group, and we worked in Zoom breakout rooms.
Midterms/Final: The first midterm was a little challenging, because unlike LS 7A&B, we were introduced to free response questions on Gradescope. We were also given 50 minutes to do 6 FRQs which was not enough time. We had about 30 multiple choice questions on CCLE with 1 hour to do them. It was difficult to finish the free response, so we were given a full hour during the second midterm. If you studied everything from Launchpad, your notes, discussion worksheets, and CLC as much as you can, then you should be okay, just don't freak out if confusing questions arise. You should know by know that's just how the LS series rolls. Due to the protests and just the general chaos of the world, the final was an automatic 100% for everyone!! Thank goodness, because genome browser during the last three weeks of the quarter was stressful and I was burnt out by that point.
ESDIN: As a lecturer, Esdin always took his time to explain everything, which was helpful of course. I ended up speeding the video up 1.5x just as a personal preference. I didn't go to Esdin's office hours often, but when I did I always learned something new and it was a pleasant vibe.
Course topics/studying tips: There was so much information to cover that you have to read Launchpad thoroughly to fully grasp everything though. This isn't like LS 7A; you have to prepare for concepts. I took IB Bio HL 2 in high school and honestly the topics were VERY similar so I feel like that preparation helped me and encouraged me throughout the quarter. A full list of information we went over includes: cell communication, nervous system, endocrine system, motor/muscle systems, cardiovascular and pulmonary systems, excretory and digestive systems, immune system, and another three weeks of Genome Browser stuff. What I did to maintain my sanity each week, stop myself from drowning in stress, and just to organize information so I could remember everything was: doing the pre-class worksheets posted on CCLE each week, making flashcards of all the learning objectives with diagrams and detailed info, doing Launchpad early/basically as soon as it was posted so I had time to study and absorb information without rushing it the night before, taking thorough notes of definitions and new info and adding to them during lecture, and checking campuswire and groupme for updates and questions.
Professor Esdin is a really great professor. He's supportive and accommodating to his students, and really wants everybody to succeed. His jokes made online school a bit less boring. He is a clear lecturer and I recommend taking him or Khankan. The midterms, like the entire LS series, are poorly worded and can easily confuse you. Be careful taking the exams, and make sure you really understand the concepts. Also, he didn't mention it in class (its in the syllabus), but its possible to earn a few points extra credit by helping people on Campuswire.
This professor is great and very thorough. Pay attention to lectures and just do the pre-class reading guides to not spend all your time on launchpad. I would say the clickers for this class very a bit easier than what you would see on the actual tests. The 7 series tests were always terrible though.
I liked the content of the class a lot and a many things taught in this course was material many people haven't been exposed to. Professor Esdin is very clear with lecture content and is super engaging! BUT, as you may know, this is part of the LS7 series; there's always something that's gotta be wrong with the class. In this case, it was the exams. I prayed a few days before midterms and the final that the wording was going to be clear, but nope. The wording on the midterms were extremely ambiguous and needlessly tedious to understand, as a result, people often wasted time trying to even comprehend the horrific questions. The final was not terrible however. My recommendation is to read exam problems VERY carefully since supposedly they "don't try to trick you" but really they do. Also, go over in class diagrams and discussion concepts, these two are very important since they will show up on exams. Good luck taking this class!
I hated 7B so much, but this class was infinitely better. It was interesting, and the first 7 weeks were really fun to learn about. I loved my TA Zac, and my discussion was small, so we were able to ask questions and dive deeper into the material. The LA CLC sessions are also super helpful, so I definitely recommend.
As always, Launchpad is annoying, and only slightly helpful. To study, I made one page study guides for each chapter and went over clickers. For each test, I studied the night before and it was sufficient.
My class was joint with Cooper, and he wasn't as engaging as Esdin, but still a good professor.
I believe our class was curved by 1% which bumped me up a grade.
Overall, I would recommend these professors, but as we all know your professor doesn't matter much for the 7 series.
***THIS WRITTEN REVIEW IS STRICTLY FOR JULIE MARTINEZ (TA)***
I literally can not believe how this TA screwed over my grade. She took off points every single week, on every discussion worksheet, off of answers that I would completely base off of her short presentations and slides AND what she would say to me when my break out room would call her in. She looks for VERY specific words -> if you don't include it, automatic 7/8 or less. She ended up dropping my grade a letter grade and it did not get better over the ten weeks. AVOID THIS TA AT ALL COSTS. She seems really nice but literally will not cut you any slack. When I asked her how I could improve, all she basically said was to use more specific words(??) and to try harder(??) I've always scored 100% in discussion for 7A and 7B but this TA really was not it.
**7C RANT WARNING: Professor Esdin was an amazing teacher. I would recommend him over the other 7C professors for sure. Always funny and engaging, great knowledgeable and personable man, very clearly explaining the slides, and understanding of students and willing to help ---- when possible. I say when possible because this class f-ing sucks and sometimes he himself had no idea what the hell was going on - I'll explain later in my rant. This rant is about 7C, not Esdin.
I have never been able to say that my blood pressure raises by 40 mmHg just by thinking back to my experience of a class, until this class. Jesus Christ please be prepared for the worst class of your life. Whoever created the curriculum for 7C deserves a life sentence in prison because I have never felt such a LACK of guidance and clarity in a class.
For starters, a usual 7 series lab discussion is a time for learning and explanation of the subjects being taught in lecture. For some reason, 7C does not allow TAs or LAs to give you the answers to like anything, especially what's going on in lab discussion. BRUHHHHH. HOW TF AM I SUPPOSED TO LEARN????
Next, be aware of the tests. I somehow did well, way above average actually, which for the first midterm was rumored to be in the 40s. Still, they made me want to kill myself and whoever wrote them. I kid you not, every single question was so unclear that they were testing your ability to fucking read the test writer's mind at this point. They could all be interpreted to make sense for each answer choice, which mind you was pretty much either true or false 90% of the time. Yeah....
No knowledge based testing, purely your ability to reason through a logical hellhole with those double-double-double-negative phrased questions they love to ask.
About Esdin having no idea what he is talking about sometimes: One time students asked him about a wacky ass problem solving session question that was one of these logical mind-reading stupidity ones, and he literally could not figure it out for himself. I mean WHAT THE FUCK ARE WE DOING HERE if the professor can't even understand the curriculum?? Poor guy, who is very intelligent mind you, has no clue what is going on because of the idiots that made this series.
They had to curve the class because everyone did so terribly. This quarter they decided to make the tests webcam and then in person, and boy they must have known they fucked up. When they initially made the class online before and switched it this quarter, I'm sure they thought everyone was going to be frolicking in a meadow or something, because they did not adjust for the unspoken of "collaboration" that was going on under the rug beforehand, and everyone did so poorly. Don't get me wrong, this speaks to the incompetence of many students as well, and was a necessary step to take. But the class is so bad, that it was taken too far.
So yeah, take Esdin because he is the guy who will take the singular straw off your back so that it doesn't break with all the rest of the horrible shit in this class (reference to straw that broke the camel's back). But be prepared.... *ominous music*
The required work, such as exams, was far more difficult than what was taught in class. The instructors barely explained anything and instead relied heavily on iClicker questions without actually teaching the concepts. What’s even worse is that if a student couldn’t score above 75% on the iClicker questions during the lecture (when the concepts were being introduced for the first time), they would lose attendance points.
I really like Dr. Esdin. He knew the material well and taught clearly and concisely. However, I found that unlike the other 7 series classes, 7C's Iclickers weren't similar to the tests. Honestly, the tests felt like reading comprehensions to trick the student rather than actually teaching on the material we learned. I feel like the tests weren't specific in the wording of the questions so multiple answers could be the correct ones. They were frustrating. That being said, just based on the lectures, Esdin was a great, understanding professor. He is also funny, so go to lectures, they are worth it. I enjoyed learning about our body's systems, it was a really cool class for someone who has never taken physiology in high school.
Based on 66 Users
TOP TAGS
- Uses Slides (34)
- Engaging Lectures (32)
- Participation Matters (31)