If you are taking this class for a GE, there are so many better ones. If you are taking it for Cog Sci of Psych, take Philosophy 1 - 9 not this one. This class is very boring, repetitive, and not fun to be in. The materials are very complicated and I believe that this part of philosophy is not interesting at all.
Professor Armstrong is very monotone and I believe that out of 150 people taking the class, only about 70 shows up, and 10 of them sleep through the lecture. There are 3 papers that make up 90 percent of your grade, and they are very challenging.
If you have Kim as a TA, try to switch your section. She makes everything way too complicated, argues with the professor a lot (like she knows better), and grades very harshly. If you have Amber, you are good because she explains everything very clearly and you can attend any of her discussions and get the attendance credit.
Overall, not an easy class.

This is not an easy GE, but it is interesting - it combines philosophy with a little bit of linguistics. I don't know about the other reviews, but I enjoyed this class. I did NOT have Kim as my TA thankfully - I had Piera who I found to be very helpful. With the time we had for lecture, I think Armstrong did his best in explaining honestly quite confusing concepts. He was always open to questions, pausing lecture if necessary when people were confused. There were three papers - one 3-5 pages all just about the philosopher(s) and their ideas, and two 5-7 page papers where we had to give our own thoughts on the concepts in addition to explaining the content we went over. Each essay had multiple prompts we could choose from, which I really liked because some concepts I was much more interested in writing in than others. The two larger papers had the option to make your own prompt if you wanted. The papers were pretty challenging, but going to office hours was super helpful in making sure my analysis was on track. The readings were all on CCLE so no textbook.

This class was a breeze. There are no tests, only weekly online reading quizzes that are very straightforward. There are three easy AND SHORT papers to write that your TA will grade, so you could really afford to miss some lectures, and focus more on attending discussion and most importantly, TA office hours. Very straightforward class, and the topics are interesting. Pretty easy GE.

Grading: 4 persuasive essays 400 word min (given at the beginning of quarter and due at the end), pick 6 essay question for midterm (600 word min), pick 5 essay questions for final (3 short responses and two long). The class was pretty easy, all information was on the slides and in the readings (assigned at least two weekly about 12-26 pages). Professor Armstrong is very nice and wants his students to be engaged in class the TA I had was a joke but the class was fairly easy so not a big deal. Just keep up and begin essay questions early and you should be fine

I took Philos/Ling M24 as a freshman, and I'd say it was a good experience.

Each week, there are two readings which were quite dense. Technically, you only need to read seven to write seven essays for the whole grade and you can wing the discussion sections, but that said, I did them all anyway to help choose the best papers to write on-- plus they were interesting!

The whole grade is based on six midterm essays, chunked into two groups of three essays, and a final essay. My TA prepared paper outline guide activities during discussions (which are mandatory) that were very helpful in writing each essay. I did, however, attend most office hours to gain more clarity and advice on how to expand on my answers in each essay. I definitely would not have scored an A+ without the office hours.

Definitely recommend Mona as your TA! I only went to one office hour with the professor, but he was quite nice and helpful too. The lectures are all recorded, and I referred to those heavily when writing each essay.

I took Philos/Ling M24 as a freshman, and I'd say it was a good experience.

Each week, there are two readings which were quite dense. Technically, you only need to read seven to write seven essays for the whole grade and you can wing the discussion sections, but that said, I did them all anyway to help choose the best papers to write on-- plus they were interesting!

The whole grade is based on six midterm essays, chunked into two groups of three essays, and a final essay. My TA prepared paper outline guide activities during discussions (which are mandatory) that were very helpful in writing each essay. I did, however, attend most office hours to gain more clarity and advice on how to expand on my answers in each essay. I definitely would not have scored an A+ without the office hours.

Definitely recommend Mona as your TA! I only went to one office hour with the professor, but he was quite nice and helpful too. The lectures are all recorded, and I referred to those heavily when writing each essay.

This was my first philosophy class and honestly I feel like I lucked out. Armstrong is a fantastic professor: really engaging and helpful (definitely go to office hours if you're still confused!). I also had a great TA, so the discussion sections were perfect for clearing up any lingering questions.

The grade consisted of:
1. Weekly quizzes (about two questions long. One question about topics covered in the previous week and one question about topics covered in the readings) [20% of grade]
2. One short paper (like a page long; served as a sort of tester paper so you get used to the formatting of writing a philosophy paper) [5% of grade]
3. Two longer papers (4-5 pages; one due around midterms and one due around finals) [30% of grade each]
4. Discussion Attendance/Participation [15% of grade]

I rated the workload as "neutral" because there is quite a bit of reading, but the grade is essentially the papers. I'd definitely recommend attending lectures, Armstrong really clarified a lot of the readings. Philosophy readings can be pretty confusing to follow (and contain a lot of ideas) Armstrong definitely narrowed down the scope of the papers and talked about the important points.

I wouldn't consider the class difficult, because it's really just a matter of giving some genuine thought to the topics and then articulating them via the papers/quizzes/discussions. It's all about how you've taken in the information and formulated your own thoughts/opinions about the material. Armstrong and my TA really stressed that they enjoy seeing students engage with the material and contribute their own ideas.

I'm a junior transfer and this was my first philosophy class. I took this class solely for units and because I was interested in philosophy, and I quickly learned that this was definitely NOT the right class for those purposes. The readings were very dense and complicated. For each essay, you can pick between 2-3 provided prompts or write your own prompt based on the readings. You're basically expected to write half of the paper summarizing/explaining your chosen article and dedicate the other half to your own analysis/opinion of the article. I found it was pointless to read the articles before lecture because Armstrong would usually give an entirely different interpretation from what one might initially assume. You really need to attend lecture (at least for the article you choose) because the summary portion of the paper is basically just regurgitating Armstong's interpretation.

I did earn an A in this class and recieved high As on the first two essays and a low A on the final essay. Contrary to the advice of other reviews, I really think this is because I attended every single lecture and took extensive notes. If you can't go to every class, try to have a friend send you notes or audio record the lecture. I was also lucky enough to have Amber as my TA and her office hours were a godsend. She was willing to go over every small detail of the essay prompts and even read drafts/outlines for the first essay. If you're looking for an easy A or filler units and you can't get into Amber's section, avoid this class!

Coming into this class never taking a philosophy class was really hard for me. I thought the subject had potential to be interesting, but Professor Armstrong lectured as if everyone had taken a philosophy course already. Although he was very nice, he talked quickly and was often very confusing. I did go to every lecture, but looking back, I really didn't need to, because I usually never knew what was going on.
Pretty much your entire learning experience relies on your discussion and your TA. I had Piera, and although she was kind of intimidating, compared to other reviews, she seemed to be more helpful than other TA's. The subject is confusing, and the texts you read are dense (Piera even said we shouldn't be reading these texts in an intro Phil class). My advice is to go to every discussion and write down pretty much everything your TA says. The only reason I got an A in this class is because I also went to almost every office hour and wrote down everything my TA said there as well. Bring your paper to your TA and and try to work with them. The three papers pretty much make up your entire grade, so ensure you answer the prompt thoroughly. A lot of my paper was rewriting what my TA said in her office hours, and that seemed to be what she wanted. Overall, if you really put in the time and carefully write down everything your TA says, I think it is doable to get an A. But this class definitely caused me unneeded stress my first quarter at UCLA.

I took this class as a first year and it has impacted how I perceived the world. The professor went in depth in certain topics like genocide and pornography. The class was graded based on 2 papers (I believe) and lecture squibs, which are basically write ups of assigned readings. The ideas presented in class were at times hard to comprehend but TA sessions helped a lot. There is no final for the class. However, the papers took me a lot of time to write and revise since philosophy has never been an easy subject , which is expected. Also attendance wasn’t mandatory.