Dr. Ko was fire, good at answering questions. Learning goals were standardized and easy to see. I like clicker questions and the work was fair, but take with a grain of salt because I did well in my 2 years of bio and 2 years of chem in high school so most of everything was easy.

For me the most helpful resource in this class was pre-class videos and assignments. This was extremely helping because I would go into lecture already having an idea of what the professor would be talking about.

Dr. Ko is in my top 2 most amazing professors I've taken at UCLA, she is so sweet and her lectures are organized so logically and beautifully. I never walked out of lecture confused because she's just so good at explaining. The grading and midterms were also super reasonable. I love her!!!

I think, overall, that your professor for 7A is not important. However, from my experience, Ko is an average professor. Some things clicked, others didn’t. She is also fairly new to teaching. 7A is a very independent course so as long you stay on top of everything you will be fine!

Professor Ko is very kind and understanding. She extended assignment due dates for the first two weeks because she recognized that we were adjusting to the course style. She also extended due dates for coursework due to the protests, recognizing that it was an emotional time for many students. Professor Ko is very compassionate towards her students and extended all extra credit deadlines (all 12 points) to the end of the quarter so more people could complete it. This class has a lot of cushioning, I did very badly on the second AoL and I was still able to get an A in the class. It does require a lot of time for studying and completing coursework. Overall, I enjoyed Professor Ko as a lecturer, she answered questions and cracked jokes. She is also very helpful during office hours and if you ask for a reasonable extension for an assignment you will most likely receive it.

I think Ko is a new professor, so take my review with a grain of salt.

Overall, this class is pretty easy, and it shouldn't really matter what professor you have, since they're all structured the same way.

I'll begin with Ko: She's enthusiastic and pretty funny, and she deeply cares about you. I never used CampusWire, which is the method she offered to communicate with her and the TAs, but I've heard she was responsive and helpful. Her lectures are purely slideshow, but she does a good job of interspersing the slides with clicker questions and she takes enough time such that it should be easy to understand. My only real problem with her was that she never offered us solutions to the tests after they were completed, and there were some pretty confusing wrong answers that my group would've loved to have cleared up. I also think that sometimes she didn't really understand herself why a concept was the way that it was, although I can't confirm that. But overall, she's a great professor and explains things clearly and engagingly.

The class itself, as I said, is fairly easy. It requires some work, but nothing outrageous. You'll have to complete questions based on textbook reading each week, and there's some fairly difficulty "practice AOLs" that you complete each week. There's also these pointless mental health modules every other week that really don't help with stress and just pissed most people off. The AOLs (basically just midterms and finals) are online, so take from that piece of information what you will. If you do your work and put in at least some effort to actually understand the material, there's a very small chance you walk away with a grade worse than a B+. If you struggle to do the textbook readings each week, or completely bomb an AOL or two, you might fare worse, but not too much worse. If you put more effort into this class than your other classes, then I'm sure you'll find yourself on top of the curve, with an A or A+.

This class has an inverted classroom setup, where you'll be doing pre-class readings and quizzes to get familiar with the material and then go into lecture to review certain aspects and work on applications. Professor Ko did try to make the lectures engaging, but I feel like the majority of the learning is done out of class. She's also very receptive to student feedback and helpful if you ask questions. The homework in pretty straight forward, but there are quite a few daily assignments. Some of these you can miss or not get full credit on until the end of the quarter, where points are given back (there's a system where a set # of points for each type of assignment will be given to you for free up to 100% credit). The exams are all online, which you take alone and then convene with your group to retake, with both parts being worth 50% of that respective exam's grade. The exam questions often try to trick you or psych you out, so it's helpful to read carefully. There was also a lot of extra credit so as long as you work with your group and stay on top of assignments, getting a good grade should be pretty easy.

I do not dislike Julie by any metric, but I do dislike the way the LS7 series is styled. I find the flipped classroom style ineffective and very much a pain. The PALs and PCRQs are kind of annoying to do and the points you lose do add up over time. However due to the maximum points set by the professors, you can mis up to 5 points on the PALs and PCRQs. The AOLs were all generally fair. However please make sure to study for AOL3. Many people neglected to do any form of studying and it very much reflected on their score at the end. Also I do not know how long the online style exams will continue, so if they convert to in person exams I do not know how much they would change the overall material of the AOLs.

The flipped classroom was not my favorite. I found the way that many small assignments were given for each class period a bit overwhelming and was constantly stressed that I was going to miss something.

The 7 series uses a flipped classroom, so most of the material had to be studied individually. So I feel the professor doesn’t matter too much, but Professor Ko was pretty engaging and made the lectures entertaining. She used daily concepts to relate to some of the matter which helped me understand it better. The class also had quite a bit of extra credit.