AD
Based on 20 Users
TOP TAGS
There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Sorry, no enrollment data is available.
AD
For any folks going through the 7 series! If you have Ko and you're struggling, I urge you to send her a message or go to her office hours. She is extremely understanding and I wish I could take this class over again just so I could ask more questions and go to more office hours. She responds to messages quickly, one time I had sent a message on campuswire, and she had sent back a response within 15 minutes.
This is not a jab at the professor, but if I'm going to be real I barely paid attention to a single lecture in this class. I don't think it's Professor Ko's fault, she's very nice and I honestly really liked her, but Lifesci 7A as a whole (and maybe the LS7 series in general) is a pretty badly structured class.
You're given a pod at the beginning of the quarter that you work with in discussions, lectures, and group tests. I was blessed with an amazing pod, but I don't think I would've liked the class if I had a bad pod. There were assignments at the end of lecture that you'd do with them which I really didn't like--you're super rushed to finish it and you don't really gain anything from them. Discussions were the only place I felt I actually learned anything because we'd usually just be working through one assignment for the whole discussion and my TA and LA were super helpful. I liked group tests because my pod worked really well together, but let's just say we spent many more hours than were recommended.
I'm pretty sure this is the case with the whole LS7 series, but the class structure where you read the textbook and fill out a reading guide (essentially learning everything yourself and then going to lecture afterwards) is so dumb. It's either busy work you forget right after you finish or it just encourages you to not pay attention in lecture. Maybe this class structure works for some people, but for me it was hard to keep up with and very unhelpful.
On the bright side, there are a lot of assignments to help bolster your test scores and a good amount of extra credit is offered to. (I will say there's a lot of busy work reflections and such which are annoying--just don't forget to do them.) Do your assignments and the extra credit and you should be fine.
Also, unpopular opinion, I kind of liked the iclicker questions you had to do every lecture because they were the only way for me to gauge how well I knew the material since I barely paid attention lol.
Although I have nothing bad to say about Professor Ko, I have much to say about the 7 series. To start, the series is set up in an inverted classroom style, where you do pre-class assignments on your own, and the lectures are there to provide further explanations. However, the PowerPoint slides, although applicable to the clicker questions, did not contribute effectively to my learning. This is not the professor's fault since all the professors are given the same materials for the class. Your success depends on your TA and how well they can explain and reiterate concepts. Thankfully, I had an excellent TA. The group portions of the exams were a helpful way to discuss complex topics. If you get a good group, the group portion should go smoothly. However, all the exam questions are set up as trick questions so make sure you pay attention to that and read everything carefully. The PALs, although tricky, set you up for the exams, so do not skip those. Overall, I loathe the 7 series, but it is not the fault of Professor Ko. Her lectures were as engaging as she could make them.
Dr. Ko was fire, good at answering questions. Learning goals were standardized and easy to see. I like clicker questions and the work was fair, but take with a grain of salt because I did well in my 2 years of bio and 2 years of chem in high school so most of everything was easy.
For me the most helpful resource in this class was pre-class videos and assignments. This was extremely helping because I would go into lecture already having an idea of what the professor would be talking about.
No matter who you get for 7a they're all about the same. My advice is to go to problem solving sessions weekly and Ko's office hours if you have questions. The class is very fast-paced so make sure you keep up with the work and go into lecture with a good understanding of the material otherwise you will get lost.
I think, overall, that your professor for 7A is not important. However, from my experience, Ko is an average professor. Some things clicked, others didn’t. She is also fairly new to teaching. 7A is a very independent course so as long you stay on top of everything you will be fine!
Professor Ko is very kind and understanding. She extended assignment due dates for the first two weeks because she recognized that we were adjusting to the course style. She also extended due dates for coursework due to the protests, recognizing that it was an emotional time for many students. Professor Ko is very compassionate towards her students and extended all extra credit deadlines (all 12 points) to the end of the quarter so more people could complete it. This class has a lot of cushioning, I did very badly on the second AoL and I was still able to get an A in the class. It does require a lot of time for studying and completing coursework. Overall, I enjoyed Professor Ko as a lecturer, she answered questions and cracked jokes. She is also very helpful during office hours and if you ask for a reasonable extension for an assignment you will most likely receive it.
I think Ko is a new professor, so take my review with a grain of salt.
Overall, this class is pretty easy, and it shouldn't really matter what professor you have, since they're all structured the same way.
I'll begin with Ko: She's enthusiastic and pretty funny, and she deeply cares about you. I never used CampusWire, which is the method she offered to communicate with her and the TAs, but I've heard she was responsive and helpful. Her lectures are purely slideshow, but she does a good job of interspersing the slides with clicker questions and she takes enough time such that it should be easy to understand. My only real problem with her was that she never offered us solutions to the tests after they were completed, and there were some pretty confusing wrong answers that my group would've loved to have cleared up. I also think that sometimes she didn't really understand herself why a concept was the way that it was, although I can't confirm that. But overall, she's a great professor and explains things clearly and engagingly.
The class itself, as I said, is fairly easy. It requires some work, but nothing outrageous. You'll have to complete questions based on textbook reading each week, and there's some fairly difficulty "practice AOLs" that you complete each week. There's also these pointless mental health modules every other week that really don't help with stress and just pissed most people off. The AOLs (basically just midterms and finals) are online, so take from that piece of information what you will. If you do your work and put in at least some effort to actually understand the material, there's a very small chance you walk away with a grade worse than a B+. If you struggle to do the textbook readings each week, or completely bomb an AOL or two, you might fare worse, but not too much worse. If you put more effort into this class than your other classes, then I'm sure you'll find yourself on top of the curve, with an A or A+.
For any folks going through the 7 series! If you have Ko and you're struggling, I urge you to send her a message or go to her office hours. She is extremely understanding and I wish I could take this class over again just so I could ask more questions and go to more office hours. She responds to messages quickly, one time I had sent a message on campuswire, and she had sent back a response within 15 minutes.
This is not a jab at the professor, but if I'm going to be real I barely paid attention to a single lecture in this class. I don't think it's Professor Ko's fault, she's very nice and I honestly really liked her, but Lifesci 7A as a whole (and maybe the LS7 series in general) is a pretty badly structured class.
You're given a pod at the beginning of the quarter that you work with in discussions, lectures, and group tests. I was blessed with an amazing pod, but I don't think I would've liked the class if I had a bad pod. There were assignments at the end of lecture that you'd do with them which I really didn't like--you're super rushed to finish it and you don't really gain anything from them. Discussions were the only place I felt I actually learned anything because we'd usually just be working through one assignment for the whole discussion and my TA and LA were super helpful. I liked group tests because my pod worked really well together, but let's just say we spent many more hours than were recommended.
I'm pretty sure this is the case with the whole LS7 series, but the class structure where you read the textbook and fill out a reading guide (essentially learning everything yourself and then going to lecture afterwards) is so dumb. It's either busy work you forget right after you finish or it just encourages you to not pay attention in lecture. Maybe this class structure works for some people, but for me it was hard to keep up with and very unhelpful.
On the bright side, there are a lot of assignments to help bolster your test scores and a good amount of extra credit is offered to. (I will say there's a lot of busy work reflections and such which are annoying--just don't forget to do them.) Do your assignments and the extra credit and you should be fine.
Also, unpopular opinion, I kind of liked the iclicker questions you had to do every lecture because they were the only way for me to gauge how well I knew the material since I barely paid attention lol.
Although I have nothing bad to say about Professor Ko, I have much to say about the 7 series. To start, the series is set up in an inverted classroom style, where you do pre-class assignments on your own, and the lectures are there to provide further explanations. However, the PowerPoint slides, although applicable to the clicker questions, did not contribute effectively to my learning. This is not the professor's fault since all the professors are given the same materials for the class. Your success depends on your TA and how well they can explain and reiterate concepts. Thankfully, I had an excellent TA. The group portions of the exams were a helpful way to discuss complex topics. If you get a good group, the group portion should go smoothly. However, all the exam questions are set up as trick questions so make sure you pay attention to that and read everything carefully. The PALs, although tricky, set you up for the exams, so do not skip those. Overall, I loathe the 7 series, but it is not the fault of Professor Ko. Her lectures were as engaging as she could make them.
Dr. Ko was fire, good at answering questions. Learning goals were standardized and easy to see. I like clicker questions and the work was fair, but take with a grain of salt because I did well in my 2 years of bio and 2 years of chem in high school so most of everything was easy.
For me the most helpful resource in this class was pre-class videos and assignments. This was extremely helping because I would go into lecture already having an idea of what the professor would be talking about.
No matter who you get for 7a they're all about the same. My advice is to go to problem solving sessions weekly and Ko's office hours if you have questions. The class is very fast-paced so make sure you keep up with the work and go into lecture with a good understanding of the material otherwise you will get lost.
I think, overall, that your professor for 7A is not important. However, from my experience, Ko is an average professor. Some things clicked, others didn’t. She is also fairly new to teaching. 7A is a very independent course so as long you stay on top of everything you will be fine!
Professor Ko is very kind and understanding. She extended assignment due dates for the first two weeks because she recognized that we were adjusting to the course style. She also extended due dates for coursework due to the protests, recognizing that it was an emotional time for many students. Professor Ko is very compassionate towards her students and extended all extra credit deadlines (all 12 points) to the end of the quarter so more people could complete it. This class has a lot of cushioning, I did very badly on the second AoL and I was still able to get an A in the class. It does require a lot of time for studying and completing coursework. Overall, I enjoyed Professor Ko as a lecturer, she answered questions and cracked jokes. She is also very helpful during office hours and if you ask for a reasonable extension for an assignment you will most likely receive it.
I think Ko is a new professor, so take my review with a grain of salt.
Overall, this class is pretty easy, and it shouldn't really matter what professor you have, since they're all structured the same way.
I'll begin with Ko: She's enthusiastic and pretty funny, and she deeply cares about you. I never used CampusWire, which is the method she offered to communicate with her and the TAs, but I've heard she was responsive and helpful. Her lectures are purely slideshow, but she does a good job of interspersing the slides with clicker questions and she takes enough time such that it should be easy to understand. My only real problem with her was that she never offered us solutions to the tests after they were completed, and there were some pretty confusing wrong answers that my group would've loved to have cleared up. I also think that sometimes she didn't really understand herself why a concept was the way that it was, although I can't confirm that. But overall, she's a great professor and explains things clearly and engagingly.
The class itself, as I said, is fairly easy. It requires some work, but nothing outrageous. You'll have to complete questions based on textbook reading each week, and there's some fairly difficulty "practice AOLs" that you complete each week. There's also these pointless mental health modules every other week that really don't help with stress and just pissed most people off. The AOLs (basically just midterms and finals) are online, so take from that piece of information what you will. If you do your work and put in at least some effort to actually understand the material, there's a very small chance you walk away with a grade worse than a B+. If you struggle to do the textbook readings each week, or completely bomb an AOL or two, you might fare worse, but not too much worse. If you put more effort into this class than your other classes, then I'm sure you'll find yourself on top of the curve, with an A or A+.
Based on 20 Users
TOP TAGS
There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.