AD
Based on 22 Users
TOP TAGS
There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Sorry, no enrollment data is available.
AD
This class has an inverted classroom setup, where you'll be doing pre-class readings and quizzes to get familiar with the material and then go into lecture to review certain aspects and work on applications. Professor Ko did try to make the lectures engaging, but I feel like the majority of the learning is done out of class. She's also very receptive to student feedback and helpful if you ask questions. The homework in pretty straight forward, but there are quite a few daily assignments. Some of these you can miss or not get full credit on until the end of the quarter, where points are given back (there's a system where a set # of points for each type of assignment will be given to you for free up to 100% credit). The exams are all online, which you take alone and then convene with your group to retake, with both parts being worth 50% of that respective exam's grade. The exam questions often try to trick you or psych you out, so it's helpful to read carefully. There was also a lot of extra credit so as long as you work with your group and stay on top of assignments, getting a good grade should be pretty easy.
I do not dislike Julie by any metric, but I do dislike the way the LS7 series is styled. I find the flipped classroom style ineffective and very much a pain. The PALs and PCRQs are kind of annoying to do and the points you lose do add up over time. However due to the maximum points set by the professors, you can mis up to 5 points on the PALs and PCRQs. The AOLs were all generally fair. However please make sure to study for AOL3. Many people neglected to do any form of studying and it very much reflected on their score at the end. Also I do not know how long the online style exams will continue, so if they convert to in person exams I do not know how much they would change the overall material of the AOLs.
The flipped classroom was not my favorite. I found the way that many small assignments were given for each class period a bit overwhelming and was constantly stressed that I was going to miss something.
The 7 series uses a flipped classroom, so most of the material had to be studied individually. So I feel the professor doesn’t matter too much, but Professor Ko was pretty engaging and made the lectures entertaining. She used daily concepts to relate to some of the matter which helped me understand it better. The class also had quite a bit of extra credit.
LS 7a was an easy enough class that is truly designed for you to succeed. It was taught by two professors (Ko and Maloy) who took turns leading lectures. Participation is graded/mandatory in lectures (iClicker questions) and discussions (takes attendance), but you can miss a few classes without affecting your grade. In your discussion section, you are placed in a group of 4 that is your "pod" for the whole quarter and you sit with them in discussions/lectures. For the tests, there are two online midterms and an online final (called "Assessments of Learning"/AoLs). The two midterms were okay, but the final was significantly harder. Each AoL has an individual portion which makes up 50% of the overall AoL score, and then a group portion where you take the test again with your pod and you have the opportunity to change your answers (the other 50%). Lots of extra credit opportunities are provided as well.
LS7A is a pretty standard life science class. Overall, if you skim the textbook, go to class and discussion (participation is graded), and do the clicker questions before the test, you should have no problem getting an A. Professor Ko is not great at explaining the material and often confuses concepts herself -- I found my TA more reliable.
This class has an inverted classroom setup, where you'll be doing pre-class readings and quizzes to get familiar with the material and then go into lecture to review certain aspects and work on applications. Professor Ko did try to make the lectures engaging, but I feel like the majority of the learning is done out of class. She's also very receptive to student feedback and helpful if you ask questions. The homework in pretty straight forward, but there are quite a few daily assignments. Some of these you can miss or not get full credit on until the end of the quarter, where points are given back (there's a system where a set # of points for each type of assignment will be given to you for free up to 100% credit). The exams are all online, which you take alone and then convene with your group to retake, with both parts being worth 50% of that respective exam's grade. The exam questions often try to trick you or psych you out, so it's helpful to read carefully. There was also a lot of extra credit so as long as you work with your group and stay on top of assignments, getting a good grade should be pretty easy.
I do not dislike Julie by any metric, but I do dislike the way the LS7 series is styled. I find the flipped classroom style ineffective and very much a pain. The PALs and PCRQs are kind of annoying to do and the points you lose do add up over time. However due to the maximum points set by the professors, you can mis up to 5 points on the PALs and PCRQs. The AOLs were all generally fair. However please make sure to study for AOL3. Many people neglected to do any form of studying and it very much reflected on their score at the end. Also I do not know how long the online style exams will continue, so if they convert to in person exams I do not know how much they would change the overall material of the AOLs.
The flipped classroom was not my favorite. I found the way that many small assignments were given for each class period a bit overwhelming and was constantly stressed that I was going to miss something.
The 7 series uses a flipped classroom, so most of the material had to be studied individually. So I feel the professor doesn’t matter too much, but Professor Ko was pretty engaging and made the lectures entertaining. She used daily concepts to relate to some of the matter which helped me understand it better. The class also had quite a bit of extra credit.
LS 7a was an easy enough class that is truly designed for you to succeed. It was taught by two professors (Ko and Maloy) who took turns leading lectures. Participation is graded/mandatory in lectures (iClicker questions) and discussions (takes attendance), but you can miss a few classes without affecting your grade. In your discussion section, you are placed in a group of 4 that is your "pod" for the whole quarter and you sit with them in discussions/lectures. For the tests, there are two online midterms and an online final (called "Assessments of Learning"/AoLs). The two midterms were okay, but the final was significantly harder. Each AoL has an individual portion which makes up 50% of the overall AoL score, and then a group portion where you take the test again with your pod and you have the opportunity to change your answers (the other 50%). Lots of extra credit opportunities are provided as well.
LS7A is a pretty standard life science class. Overall, if you skim the textbook, go to class and discussion (participation is graded), and do the clicker questions before the test, you should have no problem getting an A. Professor Ko is not great at explaining the material and often confuses concepts herself -- I found my TA more reliable.
Based on 22 Users
TOP TAGS
There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.