Introduction to Ethical Theory

Julie Tannenbaum

Introduction to Ethical Theory

Philosophy department

Julie Tannenbaum

Add Review
from 11 users

Ratings

Bad
Overall 3.5
Good
Hard
Easiness of class 1.6
Easy
Heavy
Workload 1.6
Light
Not Clear
Clarity of professor 3.8
Clear
Not Helpful
Helpfulness of professor 4.1
Helpful
AD

Tags

  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Often Funny

Grades

Spring 2006
25.5%
21.2%
17.0%
12.7%
8.5%
4.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

AD
AD
1 of 1

Reviews

Quarter Taken: Fall 2016 Submitted Dec. 26, 2016 Grade Received: A-

(I had this class with Alexander Julius, not the professor listed) DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS WITH AJ. He's is the worst. He's a funny guy but his lectures don't make sense at all. He doesn't believe in microphones and does a horrible job explaining what can be at times very convoluted text. That being said, the three assigned papers are very easy and if you have a good TA they will give you the answers to the prompts. It seemed like my TA knew how ridiculous AJ was so she wanted to help us as much as possible. I never went to lecture, rarely showed up to discussions, and still got an A-in the class. It is an experience I would not like to repeat, though.

Quarter Taken: N/A Submitted July 16, 2006 Grade Received: N/A

I LOVE THIS PROFESSOR! The class was a little difficult for me because I'm not fantastic at philosophy, but I really enjoyed her lectures. She did a great job explaining the content, and she has great organizational skills. Yes, she does try to memorize her students' names, and she cares very much about their learning. She also is very enthusiastic about what she teaches, and she answers students' questions effectively. My TA was good, so the overall class was a very good experience.

Quarter Taken: N/A Submitted June 22, 2006 Grade Received: N/A

im a philosophy major who took this class, after taking numerous UD philosophy classes and her demands were ridiculous. well actually she taught the class very well and provided good lectures, but I had a horrible TA. basically, this class CAN be easy and good, but the problems lie not with the teacher, but with the TAs, because they were ALL subpar. I would take her for a upper division course in which she oversees the grading, but not one were the TAs do, because they were horrible to say the least

Quarter Taken: N/A Submitted June 22, 2006 Grade Received: N/A

Her lecturers were quite engaging. She tries to memorize your name during lecture if you ask a question, which I thought was kind of nice of her. She can be a bit rude at times, but she is also concerned about her students understanding the material. The readings are difficult to understand, but then Philosophy in general is a difficult subject. In order to understand the readings more clearly you must go to lectures. However, I do have to warn you that the paper topics are extremely difficult, it takes up a lot of time and of course a lot of overly thinking about subjects, but again, that\355s what Philosophy is all about.

1 of 1

Tags

  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Often Funny
ADS

Report Review

Did this review contain...

There are errors in the report form.

Thank you for the report!

We'll look into this shortly.

It seems like you’re

using an ad blocker. :(


Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!