- Home
- Search
- Katsushi Arisaka
- PHYSICS 4AL
AD
Based on 31 Users
TOP TAGS
There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Sorry, no enrollment data is available.
AD
Content-wise, this class is extremely free. You slide an Arduino down a ramp then write a lab report on how you've proven that gravity exists. It barely even qualifies as a high school physics experiment.
Workload-wise, I've put more time into this class than I have for most of my 4-unit lower divs.
Grading-wise, it's entirely dependent on your TA. I had the misfortune of having a TA who repeatedly took off points for grammar and phrasing (we lost 3 points for calling the air track cart a "plastic platform") and then proceeded to deny the regrade request. We also lost lost points for writing "the force on an ideal spring" instead of "the force exerted by an ideal spring" which first of all is extremely dumb to take points off for, and second of all doesn't even make sense because of Newton's 3rd law. From talking to my friends, it seems like most TAs are fine, but it's something to keep in mind when taking this class.
This class is completely run by a TA. My TA was nice and helpful! For each lab, you'll just copy the circuit diagram and Arduino code, run the experiment, and fill in some blanks in a Python template to analyze the data. It was a solid introduction into data/error analysis and report writing. For a 2-credit class, I thought it was paced well.
Things seemed pretty organized overall considering the online format. Pray for a good lab group. I had Chau Dao as a TA, he was great: super helpful and pretty relaxed about things.
Holy crap I might have had more work for this 2 unit class than for any of my others. They load on the amount of stuff you have to do for no reason. Every lab you have to have like 12 tabs open, the teacher and TAs are super disorganized, and since we were the first section they would find problems with the experiment and we would have to redo stuff all the time. It was a very heavy workload for no reason. Make sure you rely on your group-mates. You're all in it together and just get the work done on time. It's not harsh grading. Just a ton of busy work. Be prepared.
Took virtually due to COVID.
The course was hastily moved online and it showed. Labs were being edited and made as the quarter continued and instructions for reports were vague. That being said, the labs were decent. Not super interesting and had a somewhat heavy workload considering this class is only 2 units. I can imagine this class would be more interesting and easier if it were in person, as TAs couldn't exactly troubleshoot your circuits over zoom. Also, if you have a bad lab group, you won't have a good time, especially during the final lab/presentation.
This was a great class. It will honestly probably be better when it's not online, but I was honestly impressed with how smooth it was even with Zoom calls instead of in person. The group labs are pretty great and would be even better if it could happen in person, but overall a great course. There are some cool labs and you learn basic Python programming for representing data and manipulating it, which is a great skill. You also learn some Arduino, which is super fun. Overall, great class, take it. It is a little bit of work for being a 2 unit class though, so be aware of that. Occasionally it can be time consuming.
It's a lot easier than the old version, from what I've heard. However, be prepared to spend some significant time (approaching 4-unit class) on prelabs and lab reports.
Warning:
Also, the lab reports are graded quite harshly; 3/5 is given for MEETING all of the requirements. You need to go "above and beyond" (which was not very clear how) to get a full score. So you will get a B unless you go "above and beyond."
Glad I took the redesigned version of this class. Its not very hard and the prelabs/labs every week were not difficult. The lab reports (2 during the quarter and one final one due finals week) were somewhat time consuming but it wasn't hard to get all/most of the points as long as you follow the directions. The final was an experiment that you and your lab partners came up with (lab partner were assigned, luckily mine came in clutch). It wasn't too bad but presenting it kind of sucked because a TA from a different section came in and grilled everyone during the Q&A portion which was painful to watch. The material wasn't really super interesting (Arduino, Python data fitting) but this definitely wasn't a bad class now that its redesigned.
I'm happy I waited until they redesigned 4AL to take it, because this new version of it is not too bad. I personally did not find it very enjoyable, but it is also not very hard. Pre labs and lab reports both revolve around Python, but they explain pretty much just give us the code we need to complete these assignments; you basically just look at how they used the code for their example and apply it to what you are doing. In fact, for the pre labs they give skeleton code and you just click through it and add exactly what they say to add in comments.
The annoying parts of this class are the bigger lab reports. There are 3 of these total, including one that was due at 11 PM on the last day of the quarter. They take a while to do and it seems somewhat arbitrary where points are taken off. Granted, you will probably get most of the points by following the instructions, and you can get half the points you missed back if you fix the errors and resubmit it.
The final part of the class consists of an experiment and presentation that your group comes up with (you are assigned your group members BTW, rather than getting to choose your own). All in all, this class is not too bad.
Content-wise, this class is extremely free. You slide an Arduino down a ramp then write a lab report on how you've proven that gravity exists. It barely even qualifies as a high school physics experiment.
Workload-wise, I've put more time into this class than I have for most of my 4-unit lower divs.
Grading-wise, it's entirely dependent on your TA. I had the misfortune of having a TA who repeatedly took off points for grammar and phrasing (we lost 3 points for calling the air track cart a "plastic platform") and then proceeded to deny the regrade request. We also lost lost points for writing "the force on an ideal spring" instead of "the force exerted by an ideal spring" which first of all is extremely dumb to take points off for, and second of all doesn't even make sense because of Newton's 3rd law. From talking to my friends, it seems like most TAs are fine, but it's something to keep in mind when taking this class.
This class is completely run by a TA. My TA was nice and helpful! For each lab, you'll just copy the circuit diagram and Arduino code, run the experiment, and fill in some blanks in a Python template to analyze the data. It was a solid introduction into data/error analysis and report writing. For a 2-credit class, I thought it was paced well.
Things seemed pretty organized overall considering the online format. Pray for a good lab group. I had Chau Dao as a TA, he was great: super helpful and pretty relaxed about things.
Holy crap I might have had more work for this 2 unit class than for any of my others. They load on the amount of stuff you have to do for no reason. Every lab you have to have like 12 tabs open, the teacher and TAs are super disorganized, and since we were the first section they would find problems with the experiment and we would have to redo stuff all the time. It was a very heavy workload for no reason. Make sure you rely on your group-mates. You're all in it together and just get the work done on time. It's not harsh grading. Just a ton of busy work. Be prepared.
Took virtually due to COVID.
The course was hastily moved online and it showed. Labs were being edited and made as the quarter continued and instructions for reports were vague. That being said, the labs were decent. Not super interesting and had a somewhat heavy workload considering this class is only 2 units. I can imagine this class would be more interesting and easier if it were in person, as TAs couldn't exactly troubleshoot your circuits over zoom. Also, if you have a bad lab group, you won't have a good time, especially during the final lab/presentation.
This was a great class. It will honestly probably be better when it's not online, but I was honestly impressed with how smooth it was even with Zoom calls instead of in person. The group labs are pretty great and would be even better if it could happen in person, but overall a great course. There are some cool labs and you learn basic Python programming for representing data and manipulating it, which is a great skill. You also learn some Arduino, which is super fun. Overall, great class, take it. It is a little bit of work for being a 2 unit class though, so be aware of that. Occasionally it can be time consuming.
It's a lot easier than the old version, from what I've heard. However, be prepared to spend some significant time (approaching 4-unit class) on prelabs and lab reports.
Warning:
Also, the lab reports are graded quite harshly; 3/5 is given for MEETING all of the requirements. You need to go "above and beyond" (which was not very clear how) to get a full score. So you will get a B unless you go "above and beyond."
Glad I took the redesigned version of this class. Its not very hard and the prelabs/labs every week were not difficult. The lab reports (2 during the quarter and one final one due finals week) were somewhat time consuming but it wasn't hard to get all/most of the points as long as you follow the directions. The final was an experiment that you and your lab partners came up with (lab partner were assigned, luckily mine came in clutch). It wasn't too bad but presenting it kind of sucked because a TA from a different section came in and grilled everyone during the Q&A portion which was painful to watch. The material wasn't really super interesting (Arduino, Python data fitting) but this definitely wasn't a bad class now that its redesigned.
I'm happy I waited until they redesigned 4AL to take it, because this new version of it is not too bad. I personally did not find it very enjoyable, but it is also not very hard. Pre labs and lab reports both revolve around Python, but they explain pretty much just give us the code we need to complete these assignments; you basically just look at how they used the code for their example and apply it to what you are doing. In fact, for the pre labs they give skeleton code and you just click through it and add exactly what they say to add in comments.
The annoying parts of this class are the bigger lab reports. There are 3 of these total, including one that was due at 11 PM on the last day of the quarter. They take a while to do and it seems somewhat arbitrary where points are taken off. Granted, you will probably get most of the points by following the instructions, and you can get half the points you missed back if you fix the errors and resubmit it.
The final part of the class consists of an experiment and presentation that your group comes up with (you are assigned your group members BTW, rather than getting to choose your own). All in all, this class is not too bad.
Based on 31 Users
TOP TAGS
There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.