Kimberley Gomez
Department of Education
AD
2.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 4.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
70.5%
58.7%
47.0%
35.2%
23.5%
11.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

71.1%
59.2%
47.4%
35.5%
23.7%
11.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

56.5%
47.1%
37.7%
28.3%
18.8%
9.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

45.7%
38.1%
30.5%
22.9%
15.2%
7.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2022
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
June 2, 2022

This course was labeled Education 122: Literacy in Society.

As someone who has been very engaged and inspired by the education classes I have taken here at UCLA, I have to say I was a bit disappointed in the delivery and my engagement during this particular course. This course had a lot of group and collaboration-based work. It was nice to connect with other peers, but none of the work we did in our groups was meaningful or challenging, it seemed like a lot of busy work to me personally. I think the group work would have had a greater impact on me had the work been more engaging and not as pointless. This professor was very kind, understanding, and accommodating to health, personal, and COVID-related issues, which was much appreciated during this time. She seemed to have a genuine interest in the subject, I just feel that delivery was not effective. I personally felt like the assessments in this class (workplace paper, book that made a difference, connecting tech and literacy project) were all just time-consuming busy work and did not meaningfully contribute to my understanding of the class material. It felt like I spent a lot of time on papers and projects that were just busy work. Being a UCLA upper-division class, I was disappointed in the assessments and assignments in this class. I can't say I would recommend others to take this class unless they are just wanting a very easy (but somewhat writing-heavy and boring) course that they honestly will not gain much from.

Helpful?

0 1 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Spring 2022
Grade: A
June 2, 2022

This course was labeled Education 122: Literacy in Society.

As someone who has been very engaged and inspired by the education classes I have taken here at UCLA, I have to say I was a bit disappointed in the delivery and my engagement during this particular course. This course had a lot of group and collaboration-based work. It was nice to connect with other peers, but none of the work we did in our groups was meaningful or challenging, it seemed like a lot of busy work to me personally. I think the group work would have had a greater impact on me had the work been more engaging and not as pointless. This professor was very kind, understanding, and accommodating to health, personal, and COVID-related issues, which was much appreciated during this time. She seemed to have a genuine interest in the subject, I just feel that delivery was not effective. I personally felt like the assessments in this class (workplace paper, book that made a difference, connecting tech and literacy project) were all just time-consuming busy work and did not meaningfully contribute to my understanding of the class material. It felt like I spent a lot of time on papers and projects that were just busy work. Being a UCLA upper-division class, I was disappointed in the assessments and assignments in this class. I can't say I would recommend others to take this class unless they are just wanting a very easy (but somewhat writing-heavy and boring) course that they honestly will not gain much from.

Helpful?

0 1 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 4.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!