Kirsten Turlo
Department of Biomedical Research
AD
4.9
Overall Rating
Based on 7 Users
Easiness 4.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.4 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.6 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 5.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
  • Engaging Lectures
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Participation Matters
  • Would Take Again
  • Has Group Projects
  • Issues PTEs
  • Is Podcasted
  • Gives Extra Credit
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
51.5%
42.9%
34.3%
25.8%
17.2%
8.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

100.0%
83.3%
66.7%
50.0%
33.3%
16.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

56.3%
46.9%
37.5%
28.1%
18.8%
9.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

76.9%
64.1%
51.3%
38.5%
25.6%
12.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

72.4%
60.3%
48.3%
36.2%
24.1%
12.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

71.0%
59.1%
47.3%
35.5%
23.7%
11.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

90.0%
75.0%
60.0%
45.0%
30.0%
15.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

75.9%
63.2%
50.6%
37.9%
25.3%
12.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

50.0%
41.7%
33.3%
25.0%
16.7%
8.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

66.7%
55.6%
44.4%
33.3%
22.2%
11.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

70.4%
58.6%
46.9%
35.2%
23.5%
11.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

45.0%
37.5%
30.0%
22.5%
15.0%
7.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (6)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2019
Grade: A+
Jan. 31, 2020

Turlo is an amazing professor. She's incredibly supportive and encouraging for people to participate and express their thoughts and views. She does call people out by name to answer questions, but you get used to it. Overall, this class is great if you want to think more critically about research literature. The midterm/final is writing a research proposal, and Turlo does a great job of guiding you through it. Highly recommend!

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2019
Grade: A
Dec. 26, 2019

Dr. Turlo is super nice, and she provides a lot of assistance with the assignments if you ask her beforehand. She is also a huge nerd and loves what she teaches. The class itself is also really fun because you get to cover a particular subject in great depth. It forces you to read through lots of scientific literature in great depth. None of my previous classes required that from me, so I'm happy to have had the chance to develop that skill. Since the class is small, I also recommend getting to know a couple of your peers. Friendship is magic.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2019
Grade: A+
March 28, 2019

Dr. Turlo grew on me so much midway through the quarter.

At first, it was hard to reconcile how she's a stickler for certain things (which she herself admits), such as attendance and formatting on assignments. But this does come from her wanting us to be able to gain the most out of the class - and the formatting comes from how it needs to be precise when you write grants, so she's just modeling that experience. So, I think she's a little bit hard to relate to at first, but truly, she's just a woman who loves science and she is incredibly willing to help and give encouragement. Office hours are very helpful in doing well in the class. Also, just know that Dr. Turlo is far more accommodating than you might expect based off first impression - she was willing to work with me individually to help me succeed when I was going through some mental health challenges and extreme burnout.

Be aware that she grades harshly on the first assignment (out of 5 points, with a lot of people getting 2's), as a motivator for the rest of the course. But in the end she's not trying to hurt anyone and gives opportunities to make up points and to grow from the experience. She will probably say herself later on in the quarter that after the first assignment, most people get 100% (or near 100%) on the other assignments.

With the proposal in the latter half of the course, it's time-consuming, but I appreciated that she let us branch out from the seminar talk into areas that were more interesting to us. Honestly, this was the experience I was waiting for after 5HA. To write a proposal, because this assignment totally kicked my ass but suddenly within a week, I'd been forced to learn how to truly read scientific literature in large volumes like never before. It was a truly helpful experience and I gained so much from it.

It's also very nice of Dr. Turlo to let us submit the final multiple times until we get full credit. I only submitted once, but I still did well because of how much time I had spent with her in office hours/appointments to get on the right track.

Discussions were less helpful and I unfortunately got a group that just was not very engaged/talkative. Like, no shade against any individuals since I had no issue with anyone in the class, but the discussion project we had was mainly a waste of time and the group work for that was so frustrating.

Symposium was more fun albeit stressful near the end of the quarter and also gave us an opportunity to practice oral presentation skills. Just try your best and it will be entirely fine :).

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2019
Grade: A
July 23, 2020

Profesor Turlo is awesome and probably one of the best professors I’ve had at UCLA. She’s really invested in her students’ success and will definitely help you with whatever you need in the class (including answering emails at 4am lol). The class itself is super interesting and really allows you to go in depth to a specific field of research, and for me it even inspired me to pursue the field of research I’m in now. The main project in the class is a research grant proposal and allows for a lot of creative freedom. Overall, it’s a great class, and I would definitely recommend Turlo as a professor.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2018
Grade: A
Feb. 5, 2019

Dr. Turlo is amazing! She's so nice and very helpful. You can tell she genuinely cares about her students overall and any class with her is great

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2018
Grade: A
June 22, 2018

Dr. Turlo is the sweetest lady ever and you will definitely do well if you put in the effort. She is absolutely passionate about research and making sure you understand the material. However, her lectures are a bit disorganized and if you don't have any kind of research background, a lot of what is said will pass straight through your ears. If you are bold enough, ask questions during lecture because that will probably facilitate your understanding (I say probably because I never did). For me, I learned more from talking to peers and doing my own reading and analysis than trying to soak in what was said. If you are confused at all, I highly highly recommend going to her office hours. This is especially critical when you do your midterm proposal and group symposium project. Work on your assignments and go to her office hours EARLY to get her feedback on your ideas! With that, good luck.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2019
Grade: A+
Jan. 31, 2020

Turlo is an amazing professor. She's incredibly supportive and encouraging for people to participate and express their thoughts and views. She does call people out by name to answer questions, but you get used to it. Overall, this class is great if you want to think more critically about research literature. The midterm/final is writing a research proposal, and Turlo does a great job of guiding you through it. Highly recommend!

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2019
Grade: A
Dec. 26, 2019

Dr. Turlo is super nice, and she provides a lot of assistance with the assignments if you ask her beforehand. She is also a huge nerd and loves what she teaches. The class itself is also really fun because you get to cover a particular subject in great depth. It forces you to read through lots of scientific literature in great depth. None of my previous classes required that from me, so I'm happy to have had the chance to develop that skill. Since the class is small, I also recommend getting to know a couple of your peers. Friendship is magic.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2019
Grade: A+
March 28, 2019

Dr. Turlo grew on me so much midway through the quarter.

At first, it was hard to reconcile how she's a stickler for certain things (which she herself admits), such as attendance and formatting on assignments. But this does come from her wanting us to be able to gain the most out of the class - and the formatting comes from how it needs to be precise when you write grants, so she's just modeling that experience. So, I think she's a little bit hard to relate to at first, but truly, she's just a woman who loves science and she is incredibly willing to help and give encouragement. Office hours are very helpful in doing well in the class. Also, just know that Dr. Turlo is far more accommodating than you might expect based off first impression - she was willing to work with me individually to help me succeed when I was going through some mental health challenges and extreme burnout.

Be aware that she grades harshly on the first assignment (out of 5 points, with a lot of people getting 2's), as a motivator for the rest of the course. But in the end she's not trying to hurt anyone and gives opportunities to make up points and to grow from the experience. She will probably say herself later on in the quarter that after the first assignment, most people get 100% (or near 100%) on the other assignments.

With the proposal in the latter half of the course, it's time-consuming, but I appreciated that she let us branch out from the seminar talk into areas that were more interesting to us. Honestly, this was the experience I was waiting for after 5HA. To write a proposal, because this assignment totally kicked my ass but suddenly within a week, I'd been forced to learn how to truly read scientific literature in large volumes like never before. It was a truly helpful experience and I gained so much from it.

It's also very nice of Dr. Turlo to let us submit the final multiple times until we get full credit. I only submitted once, but I still did well because of how much time I had spent with her in office hours/appointments to get on the right track.

Discussions were less helpful and I unfortunately got a group that just was not very engaged/talkative. Like, no shade against any individuals since I had no issue with anyone in the class, but the discussion project we had was mainly a waste of time and the group work for that was so frustrating.

Symposium was more fun albeit stressful near the end of the quarter and also gave us an opportunity to practice oral presentation skills. Just try your best and it will be entirely fine :).

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2019
Grade: A
July 23, 2020

Profesor Turlo is awesome and probably one of the best professors I’ve had at UCLA. She’s really invested in her students’ success and will definitely help you with whatever you need in the class (including answering emails at 4am lol). The class itself is super interesting and really allows you to go in depth to a specific field of research, and for me it even inspired me to pursue the field of research I’m in now. The main project in the class is a research grant proposal and allows for a lot of creative freedom. Overall, it’s a great class, and I would definitely recommend Turlo as a professor.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2018
Grade: A
Feb. 5, 2019

Dr. Turlo is amazing! She's so nice and very helpful. You can tell she genuinely cares about her students overall and any class with her is great

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2018
Grade: A
June 22, 2018

Dr. Turlo is the sweetest lady ever and you will definitely do well if you put in the effort. She is absolutely passionate about research and making sure you understand the material. However, her lectures are a bit disorganized and if you don't have any kind of research background, a lot of what is said will pass straight through your ears. If you are bold enough, ask questions during lecture because that will probably facilitate your understanding (I say probably because I never did). For me, I learned more from talking to peers and doing my own reading and analysis than trying to soak in what was said. If you are confused at all, I highly highly recommend going to her office hours. This is especially critical when you do your midterm proposal and group symposium project. Work on your assignments and go to her office hours EARLY to get her feedback on your ideas! With that, good luck.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
4.9
Overall Rating
Based on 7 Users
Easiness 4.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.4 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.6 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 5.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
    (4)
  • Engaging Lectures
    (3)
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
    (1)
  • Participation Matters
    (5)
  • Would Take Again
    (4)
  • Has Group Projects
    (5)
  • Issues PTEs
    (2)
  • Is Podcasted
    (2)
  • Gives Extra Credit
    (2)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!