Koffi Enakoutsa
Department of Mathematics
AD
1.5
Overall Rating
Based on 2 Users
Easiness 2.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 1.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 1.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
67.6%
56.3%
45.1%
33.8%
22.5%
11.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

28.7%
24.0%
19.2%
14.4%
9.6%
4.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT PROGRESS
Clear marks
Loading...

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (2)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Winter 2026
Grade: B+
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
April 9, 2026

You might think this class is hard, but it's not that bad. The problem is that the professor's teaching is really torturous. His thick accent and postmodern deconstructionist-style blackboard writing make it impossible for you to understand what he's saying and teaching. As a result, I had to study this course all by myself throughout the quarter.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2026
Grade: A-
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
April 9, 2026

DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS. This class is an absolute joke.
Koffi uses slides from other previous professors (only hiding the other instructor's name while using the slides in class). The slides can be found here: https://sites.math.rutgers.edu/~sc2518/170S. This is almost certainly ACADEMIC PLAGIARISM...To a worse extent, he never explains clearly what is he doing in the class, and not exaggeratingly, half of his math computations are purely wrong (once he wrote 60/4=12 and left that on the board without noticing).
He is an incompetent teacher who only knows reading off the slides (not even his own slides) and it is likely that he doesn't even know about the course materials himself. Lecture pace was also awfully designed--we lagged an entire chapter at the end of the quarter compared to the other class.
Some comments say that he is nice as a person--it's not the way I perceive--my final exam was graded by Professor himself and two of the questions were graded wrongly. I respectfully tried to ask for regrade but he only responded me with Gen-AI texts (even not deleting ReGex expressions) and rejecting my points without taking a closer look.
If you have no choice but to take this class with him, get prepared for self-learning and unreasonable gradings.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Winter 2026
Grade: B+
April 9, 2026

You might think this class is hard, but it's not that bad. The problem is that the professor's teaching is really torturous. His thick accent and postmodern deconstructionist-style blackboard writing make it impossible for you to understand what he's saying and teaching. As a result, I had to study this course all by myself throughout the quarter.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Winter 2026
Grade: A-
April 9, 2026

DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS. This class is an absolute joke.
Koffi uses slides from other previous professors (only hiding the other instructor's name while using the slides in class). The slides can be found here: https://sites.math.rutgers.edu/~sc2518/170S. This is almost certainly ACADEMIC PLAGIARISM...To a worse extent, he never explains clearly what is he doing in the class, and not exaggeratingly, half of his math computations are purely wrong (once he wrote 60/4=12 and left that on the board without noticing).
He is an incompetent teacher who only knows reading off the slides (not even his own slides) and it is likely that he doesn't even know about the course materials himself. Lecture pace was also awfully designed--we lagged an entire chapter at the end of the quarter compared to the other class.
Some comments say that he is nice as a person--it's not the way I perceive--my final exam was graded by Professor himself and two of the questions were graded wrongly. I respectfully tried to ask for regrade but he only responded me with Gen-AI texts (even not deleting ReGex expressions) and rejecting my points without taking a closer look.
If you have no choice but to take this class with him, get prepared for self-learning and unreasonable gradings.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
1.5
Overall Rating
Based on 2 Users
Easiness 2.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 1.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 1.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!