Leslie Johns
Department of Political Science
AD
3.8
Overall Rating
Based on 69 Users
Easiness 2.4 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.7 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.4 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Tough Tests
  • Needs Textbook
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
23.7%
19.7%
15.8%
11.8%
7.9%
3.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

21.6%
18.0%
14.4%
10.8%
7.2%
3.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

27.9%
23.3%
18.6%
14.0%
9.3%
4.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

28.9%
24.1%
19.3%
14.4%
9.6%
4.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

28.8%
24.0%
19.2%
14.4%
9.6%
4.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

26.8%
22.3%
17.8%
13.4%
8.9%
4.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

17.8%
14.8%
11.9%
8.9%
5.9%
3.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

19.0%
15.8%
12.7%
9.5%
6.3%
3.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

22.4%
18.7%
15.0%
11.2%
7.5%
3.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

18.8%
15.6%
12.5%
9.4%
6.3%
3.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

19.0%
15.8%
12.6%
9.5%
6.3%
3.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

23.5%
19.6%
15.7%
11.7%
7.8%
3.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

20.7%
17.3%
13.8%
10.4%
6.9%
3.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

16.8%
14.0%
11.2%
8.4%
5.6%
2.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (56)

2 of 6
2 of 6
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2023
Grade: B-
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
June 29, 2023

I honestly could have tried a lot harder if it wasn't for other circumstances I experienced during spring quarter. I will say this prof did have the most random and extremely specific questions on the test that some people were literally forced to leave blank because they wouldn't have possibly guessed it would be on the exam. I admire professors who allow students to apply broad concepts to demonstrate their knowledge, however, sometimes it feels like a lot of these questions the professors adds were trap questions, where a good amount of students literally cannot answer effectively enough to receive full credit. I think thats lame. As for the TA's, they were all amazing.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2023
Grade: A
June 21, 2023

This class was pretty tough, probably one of the more challenging PS classes I've taken so far as a third year. Like everyone says the midterm/final was difficult. I know though, for this quarter, she made the midterm a bit easier than her previous years. But then she made the final pretty hard. As difficult as the class was though, Prof Johns did tell everyone that she designed the difficulty of this class to be kinda like a law school class, which is good to experience bc a lot of ppl in this class are planning on going to law school (myself included).

I feel like this is one of the most rewarding classes I've taken, and because I knew the tests were gonna be hard, I studied my butt off. By studying a lot, you can for sure get an A but I think a greater benefit from studying so much was that I actually learned a ton and took away a lot from this class. It's definitely one of those classes that you can say you actually retained stuff from.

Prof Johns was also super cool to talk to during OH, very approachable. My TA was Abby, she was super great and her sections really helped with my understanding of the course, like she had tables we could fill out and stuff.

All in all, don't take if u want an easy A but if you plan on going to law school, this class is a must!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2023
Grade: A+
June 20, 2023

Let me go over the class structure first before delving into my thoughts. The class has a midterm and final (30% and 40% respectively of the grade) and weekly sections with quizzes that go over the weekly case study on whatever you covering that week. Those case studies can range anywhere from ~10-25 pages and the quizzes are simple (think dates, parties involved, which courts ruled, etc.). The lowest 2 section attendance and quiz scores are dropped. The textbooks is a must since the exams do draw heavily upon it, but you can scrape an A on the midterm we took without reading, but certainly not the final.

Verdict - Professor Johns just isn't good at her job. She's an unreasonable professor who expects you to come to every class, which means that she won't post slides or post lecture recordings - not very good if you have a trip for a club, if you are a commuter student, or a late sleeper trying to make a class that was at 9:30 am. It's ok if you don't make lecture for the most part if you read the book, but the Professor does occasionally give test hints and answers in lecture to incentivize attendance.

That's not really the biggest gripe I have with the professor though, since there are 2 more major grievances. First, as mentioned on every other review on here, she does not tolerate any excuse for missing a midterm or final, which really blows if you have COVID or another illness on that level. Second, her tests are completely unreasonable, they force you to recall things with an absurd amount of specificity and to memorize all the definitions mentioned in her book almost verbatim from the glossary. Moreover, the bulk of the questions are so difficult in the sense that they don't really test you understanding of the concept, but if you can remember minor snippets from the book that don't even enhance your understanding of the concepts being tested. This may seem like idle complaining on the surface, but the tests are heavily curved, which does reflect how poorly designed they are. They are designed to make you fail and curving is supposed to fix everything in post by making the average about a B (there is no deflationary in this class though, which is good). I do want to be clear about the fact that even though I got an A+, it was more because of luck and the fact that I worked much harder for this class than any other class I've taken in PS.

I will say though, TAs can make this class significantly easier or harder. I was lucky and I had Natalie, who is an amazing TA. so if you sign up for this course and if she's around, try to select her for your section.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2023
Grade: A+
June 20, 2023

I was apprehensive about taking this class because of all of the reviews saying it was really hard. But in reality, the class was a lot easier than I expected and I actually enjoyed taking it more than I thought I would. I found the material to be really interesting and the lectures to be engaging. The exams are primarily based on memorization rather than analysis, so if that's not your speed I would suggest another class. The grade is made up of a midterm and final exam, along with weekly section quizzes and participation in section discussions. Both the miderm and final are generously curved, and they drop the two lowest quiz and participation grades. The section quizzes were very straightforward (most people get 100% every week) based on the case for that week and the professor often highlighted some of the important parts of the cases in lecture which was helpful. We covered about one chapter from the textbook each week and the lectures directly covered textbook material. She is really adamant about not posting the lecture slides on the class website which is pretty annoying, but they are not super detailed anyway and just outline information from the textbook. While the professor stressed that all textbook material was fair game for the exams, the midterm was focused almost entirely on the topics highlighted in lecture and I think most of the class found it to be easier than they expected. The final exam was a little trickier because there were a few questions that she didn't cover in lecture, but I still found attending lecture to be a useful tool in learning what material was important. The midterm and the final both had the same general format: multiple choice, definitions, short responses, and extra credit. For the definitions, my TA emphasized that we would be graded based on the glossary definition in the textbook and suggested that we memorize them word for word. It was really tedious and time-consuming, but memorizing the terms was a good way to get easy points on the exam. I recommend starting to memorize the terms from the glossary sheet well ahead of the exam because there were over 100 terms for the midterm alone. Other than that, the professor has a website for the textbook with worksheets for every chapter. They are pretty long and I wouldn't say it's necessary to complete all of them (or any of them), but they definitely helped guide my note-taking. All in all, this class has a lot of material and is by no means an easy A. But, it's interesting and definitely doable if you are willing to dedicate a little more time to studying and going to lectures.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2023
Grade: N/A
June 13, 2023

This is known to be one of the most challenging classes you can take in the PS department. Professor does not record nor post slides as she doesn't believe in them so going to class is crucial. The average on midterm is 60% curved to 85%, tests are designed for you to fail and then use the curve to bring you up. NOT AN EASY A!!! TA's are excellent (shoutout abbey you're the sweetest :) but you have to speak A LOT in discussion to get full credit. Interesting material just challenging class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2023
Grade: B
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
June 13, 2023

Professor Johns is a good and engaging lecturer, the content is interesting, and generally the TA's were well prepared to help out. Do not take this class if you enjoy getting good grades on midterms and finals, Professor Johns is a pretty rough grader, but does curve her tests. The big problem with her is that she's a self-described hard-ass. If you are sick or need other accomodations, she doesn't really care. She made people with covid come in to take tests in-person. If you don't mind that, she's fine and the class isn't too hard to get a B in without a ton of effort.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2023
Grade: B+
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
April 18, 2023

This was one of the hardest polsci classes I have taken at UCLA so far. The overall class is based on weekly quizzes and participation in discussion, the midterm, and the final. The overall content was extremely interesting, but be aware there is a lot to cover. You do not have to attend lecture; instead focus on reading all of the chapters in the textbook and take extensive notes. Lecture just consists of verbatim of the textbook mixed with offensive comments from Johns. She also gave 0 clarity on the format of the midterm. We just showed up and found out that it was about 8 short response questions. The average of the midterm was a D, and they curved it significantly. She writes these tests with the intention of her students failing, but being saved by the curve. She told students that if they were sick or had covid, they still needed to come take the midterm because she hated writing makeup exams. At first I did not believe her when she said this, however I had food poisoning the night of the final, and her response to me 30 minutes before the exam started was that I could "sit by an exit and use the bathroom as needed." I did just that. She had 0 sympathy that I had to step out of the exam room to throw up in a trashcan outside of the lecture hall. She is problematic. Do not take this course if you are easily offended or if you are expecting an A. This ruined several of my classmates 4.00. However, if you are interested in international law, this course offered a lot of information. Save your sanity though, and just buy her textbook and read it on your own.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2023
Grade: A+
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
April 5, 2023

I know that the people who write negative reviews are gonna be real negative about this class but honestly why are we surprised that an upper division class covering an entire field of law is difficult. Yes, there's a lot of information covered. Yes, the tests will sometimes require specific information from the textbook. No, it's not unreasonable or unexpected. (Also, the tests were curved alot. I think I got over 10 points added onto my midterm grade).

Professor Johns is a delight. Both her lectures and her office hours were incredibly engaging and oftentimes fun. I know that another reviewer took issue with her sense of humor, but taking it out of context of what the lecture was discussing is a disservice. I don't defend all her jokes or statements, but it is nowhere near as horrible as this reviewer made it seem. She made a significant effort to create analogies or funny stories which often times were so helpful in remembering an often nebulous concept.

My advice is as follows. If you are in this school to get an easy A, don't take this class. If you are in this school to actually learn something, sign up immediately. Go to every lecture, pay attention in section, actually engage with the readings, go to office hours. You will do fine, is it a guaranteed A/A+, absolutely not, you're going to have to grind for it. But I have never enjoyed or learned as much in another UCLA Poli Sci class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2023
Grade: A+
April 3, 2023

This was a pretty difficult but also engaging class. The grade is based on participation (15%), section quizzes (15%), midterm (30%), and final (40%). Each week, we had to read a chapter of the textbook and an additional 10ish page court ruling. Professor Johns can be an engaging lecturer, but she also has a tendency to over-explain simple concepts and not make it through entire lectures. I found the class topics to be pretty interesting and applicable to world events; the first half went over the basics of international law (what is it, who makes it, how is it enforced, etc.), and the second half went over specific areas of international law (human rights, use of force, armed conflict, criminal law, environmental law.) Make sure to memorize the facts of each weekly case reading for the section quiz because you'll be tested on some seemingly random info. The tests were definitely difficult and I felt that the TAs/Johns were a bit misleading about what was going to be on the final. But, they were curved which somewhat accounts for that.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2023
Grade: B
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
April 1, 2023

Not happy about this class whatsoever. First of all, this professor cannot go one lecture without making some sort of offensive joke. Things along the lines of: "you'd have to be autistic to believe this!", or "the Nuremberg Trials were actually not fair." Also, she would literally preface these statements asking if anyone was recording her. During the second half of the class her jokes centered around genocide. So, if you enjoy hearing offensive jokes about serious class material, go ahead and take this class.

Second of all, she ruined my 4.00. Never have I ever studied so hard for a class just to receive a B. She really expects you to memorize the entire textbook and the regurgitate super specific information onto the tests. She gives you these worksheets to study with - which make it sound easy and straightforward enough, but with the amount of questions on these worksheets it is extremely difficult to memorize all the information she expects from you.

Not happy with this class or my grade. Poli Sci classes should not have a class average of 50% on the midterm.

Helpful?

0 1 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Spring 2023
Grade: B-
June 29, 2023

I honestly could have tried a lot harder if it wasn't for other circumstances I experienced during spring quarter. I will say this prof did have the most random and extremely specific questions on the test that some people were literally forced to leave blank because they wouldn't have possibly guessed it would be on the exam. I admire professors who allow students to apply broad concepts to demonstrate their knowledge, however, sometimes it feels like a lot of these questions the professors adds were trap questions, where a good amount of students literally cannot answer effectively enough to receive full credit. I think thats lame. As for the TA's, they were all amazing.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2023
Grade: A
June 21, 2023

This class was pretty tough, probably one of the more challenging PS classes I've taken so far as a third year. Like everyone says the midterm/final was difficult. I know though, for this quarter, she made the midterm a bit easier than her previous years. But then she made the final pretty hard. As difficult as the class was though, Prof Johns did tell everyone that she designed the difficulty of this class to be kinda like a law school class, which is good to experience bc a lot of ppl in this class are planning on going to law school (myself included).

I feel like this is one of the most rewarding classes I've taken, and because I knew the tests were gonna be hard, I studied my butt off. By studying a lot, you can for sure get an A but I think a greater benefit from studying so much was that I actually learned a ton and took away a lot from this class. It's definitely one of those classes that you can say you actually retained stuff from.

Prof Johns was also super cool to talk to during OH, very approachable. My TA was Abby, she was super great and her sections really helped with my understanding of the course, like she had tables we could fill out and stuff.

All in all, don't take if u want an easy A but if you plan on going to law school, this class is a must!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2023
Grade: A+
June 20, 2023

Let me go over the class structure first before delving into my thoughts. The class has a midterm and final (30% and 40% respectively of the grade) and weekly sections with quizzes that go over the weekly case study on whatever you covering that week. Those case studies can range anywhere from ~10-25 pages and the quizzes are simple (think dates, parties involved, which courts ruled, etc.). The lowest 2 section attendance and quiz scores are dropped. The textbooks is a must since the exams do draw heavily upon it, but you can scrape an A on the midterm we took without reading, but certainly not the final.

Verdict - Professor Johns just isn't good at her job. She's an unreasonable professor who expects you to come to every class, which means that she won't post slides or post lecture recordings - not very good if you have a trip for a club, if you are a commuter student, or a late sleeper trying to make a class that was at 9:30 am. It's ok if you don't make lecture for the most part if you read the book, but the Professor does occasionally give test hints and answers in lecture to incentivize attendance.

That's not really the biggest gripe I have with the professor though, since there are 2 more major grievances. First, as mentioned on every other review on here, she does not tolerate any excuse for missing a midterm or final, which really blows if you have COVID or another illness on that level. Second, her tests are completely unreasonable, they force you to recall things with an absurd amount of specificity and to memorize all the definitions mentioned in her book almost verbatim from the glossary. Moreover, the bulk of the questions are so difficult in the sense that they don't really test you understanding of the concept, but if you can remember minor snippets from the book that don't even enhance your understanding of the concepts being tested. This may seem like idle complaining on the surface, but the tests are heavily curved, which does reflect how poorly designed they are. They are designed to make you fail and curving is supposed to fix everything in post by making the average about a B (there is no deflationary in this class though, which is good). I do want to be clear about the fact that even though I got an A+, it was more because of luck and the fact that I worked much harder for this class than any other class I've taken in PS.

I will say though, TAs can make this class significantly easier or harder. I was lucky and I had Natalie, who is an amazing TA. so if you sign up for this course and if she's around, try to select her for your section.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2023
Grade: A+
June 20, 2023

I was apprehensive about taking this class because of all of the reviews saying it was really hard. But in reality, the class was a lot easier than I expected and I actually enjoyed taking it more than I thought I would. I found the material to be really interesting and the lectures to be engaging. The exams are primarily based on memorization rather than analysis, so if that's not your speed I would suggest another class. The grade is made up of a midterm and final exam, along with weekly section quizzes and participation in section discussions. Both the miderm and final are generously curved, and they drop the two lowest quiz and participation grades. The section quizzes were very straightforward (most people get 100% every week) based on the case for that week and the professor often highlighted some of the important parts of the cases in lecture which was helpful. We covered about one chapter from the textbook each week and the lectures directly covered textbook material. She is really adamant about not posting the lecture slides on the class website which is pretty annoying, but they are not super detailed anyway and just outline information from the textbook. While the professor stressed that all textbook material was fair game for the exams, the midterm was focused almost entirely on the topics highlighted in lecture and I think most of the class found it to be easier than they expected. The final exam was a little trickier because there were a few questions that she didn't cover in lecture, but I still found attending lecture to be a useful tool in learning what material was important. The midterm and the final both had the same general format: multiple choice, definitions, short responses, and extra credit. For the definitions, my TA emphasized that we would be graded based on the glossary definition in the textbook and suggested that we memorize them word for word. It was really tedious and time-consuming, but memorizing the terms was a good way to get easy points on the exam. I recommend starting to memorize the terms from the glossary sheet well ahead of the exam because there were over 100 terms for the midterm alone. Other than that, the professor has a website for the textbook with worksheets for every chapter. They are pretty long and I wouldn't say it's necessary to complete all of them (or any of them), but they definitely helped guide my note-taking. All in all, this class has a lot of material and is by no means an easy A. But, it's interesting and definitely doable if you are willing to dedicate a little more time to studying and going to lectures.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2023
Grade: N/A
June 13, 2023

This is known to be one of the most challenging classes you can take in the PS department. Professor does not record nor post slides as she doesn't believe in them so going to class is crucial. The average on midterm is 60% curved to 85%, tests are designed for you to fail and then use the curve to bring you up. NOT AN EASY A!!! TA's are excellent (shoutout abbey you're the sweetest :) but you have to speak A LOT in discussion to get full credit. Interesting material just challenging class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Winter 2023
Grade: B
June 13, 2023

Professor Johns is a good and engaging lecturer, the content is interesting, and generally the TA's were well prepared to help out. Do not take this class if you enjoy getting good grades on midterms and finals, Professor Johns is a pretty rough grader, but does curve her tests. The big problem with her is that she's a self-described hard-ass. If you are sick or need other accomodations, she doesn't really care. She made people with covid come in to take tests in-person. If you don't mind that, she's fine and the class isn't too hard to get a B in without a ton of effort.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Winter 2023
Grade: B+
April 18, 2023

This was one of the hardest polsci classes I have taken at UCLA so far. The overall class is based on weekly quizzes and participation in discussion, the midterm, and the final. The overall content was extremely interesting, but be aware there is a lot to cover. You do not have to attend lecture; instead focus on reading all of the chapters in the textbook and take extensive notes. Lecture just consists of verbatim of the textbook mixed with offensive comments from Johns. She also gave 0 clarity on the format of the midterm. We just showed up and found out that it was about 8 short response questions. The average of the midterm was a D, and they curved it significantly. She writes these tests with the intention of her students failing, but being saved by the curve. She told students that if they were sick or had covid, they still needed to come take the midterm because she hated writing makeup exams. At first I did not believe her when she said this, however I had food poisoning the night of the final, and her response to me 30 minutes before the exam started was that I could "sit by an exit and use the bathroom as needed." I did just that. She had 0 sympathy that I had to step out of the exam room to throw up in a trashcan outside of the lecture hall. She is problematic. Do not take this course if you are easily offended or if you are expecting an A. This ruined several of my classmates 4.00. However, if you are interested in international law, this course offered a lot of information. Save your sanity though, and just buy her textbook and read it on your own.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Winter 2023
Grade: A+
April 5, 2023

I know that the people who write negative reviews are gonna be real negative about this class but honestly why are we surprised that an upper division class covering an entire field of law is difficult. Yes, there's a lot of information covered. Yes, the tests will sometimes require specific information from the textbook. No, it's not unreasonable or unexpected. (Also, the tests were curved alot. I think I got over 10 points added onto my midterm grade).

Professor Johns is a delight. Both her lectures and her office hours were incredibly engaging and oftentimes fun. I know that another reviewer took issue with her sense of humor, but taking it out of context of what the lecture was discussing is a disservice. I don't defend all her jokes or statements, but it is nowhere near as horrible as this reviewer made it seem. She made a significant effort to create analogies or funny stories which often times were so helpful in remembering an often nebulous concept.

My advice is as follows. If you are in this school to get an easy A, don't take this class. If you are in this school to actually learn something, sign up immediately. Go to every lecture, pay attention in section, actually engage with the readings, go to office hours. You will do fine, is it a guaranteed A/A+, absolutely not, you're going to have to grind for it. But I have never enjoyed or learned as much in another UCLA Poli Sci class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2023
Grade: A+
April 3, 2023

This was a pretty difficult but also engaging class. The grade is based on participation (15%), section quizzes (15%), midterm (30%), and final (40%). Each week, we had to read a chapter of the textbook and an additional 10ish page court ruling. Professor Johns can be an engaging lecturer, but she also has a tendency to over-explain simple concepts and not make it through entire lectures. I found the class topics to be pretty interesting and applicable to world events; the first half went over the basics of international law (what is it, who makes it, how is it enforced, etc.), and the second half went over specific areas of international law (human rights, use of force, armed conflict, criminal law, environmental law.) Make sure to memorize the facts of each weekly case reading for the section quiz because you'll be tested on some seemingly random info. The tests were definitely difficult and I felt that the TAs/Johns were a bit misleading about what was going to be on the final. But, they were curved which somewhat accounts for that.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Winter 2023
Grade: B
April 1, 2023

Not happy about this class whatsoever. First of all, this professor cannot go one lecture without making some sort of offensive joke. Things along the lines of: "you'd have to be autistic to believe this!", or "the Nuremberg Trials were actually not fair." Also, she would literally preface these statements asking if anyone was recording her. During the second half of the class her jokes centered around genocide. So, if you enjoy hearing offensive jokes about serious class material, go ahead and take this class.

Second of all, she ruined my 4.00. Never have I ever studied so hard for a class just to receive a B. She really expects you to memorize the entire textbook and the regurgitate super specific information onto the tests. She gives you these worksheets to study with - which make it sound easy and straightforward enough, but with the amount of questions on these worksheets it is extremely difficult to memorize all the information she expects from you.

Not happy with this class or my grade. Poli Sci classes should not have a class average of 50% on the midterm.

Helpful?

0 1 Please log in to provide feedback.
2 of 6
3.8
Overall Rating
Based on 69 Users
Easiness 2.4 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.7 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.4 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Tough Tests
    (34)
  • Needs Textbook
    (27)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!