Linda Demer
Department of Psychology
AD
5.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 4.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 5.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Needs Textbook
  • Would Take Again
  • Has Group Projects
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
62.5%
52.1%
41.7%
31.3%
20.8%
10.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

80.0%
66.7%
53.3%
40.0%
26.7%
13.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

70.0%
58.3%
46.7%
35.0%
23.3%
11.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

70.0%
58.3%
46.7%
35.0%
23.3%
11.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

72.7%
60.6%
48.5%
36.4%
24.2%
12.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Winter 2017
Grade: A
April 5, 2017

I decided to write a review for this class because I discovered just how important bruinwalk reviews are for students (and how much I appreciate it when people take the time to write a review). And this has no reviews at all.

I loved this class, more than I expected. This class is holistic, such that it really offers you ALL perspectives of autism, including the "legislative" part of autism and barriers to receiving help. The work is light. There are two "textbooks," which are actually more like novels that you read. There are also articles assigned each week, but they rarely keep track. I'd recommend reading them though. You write three essays and give a presentation of your final research paper at the end. Attendance is mandatory, but it's more like if they know your name and face by the end of the quarter, and you've reached out, went to office hours, they give you participation points. Make sure they know who you are.

I also loved the format of our class. Each week, prominent guest speakers of the autism community (from different backgrounds i.e. perspectives) will come and talk about their work. The majority of "lectures" were guest speakers, and sometimes she would talk herself (or Judith Mark, her co-instructor). We also were required to go to a disability policy conference (it's paid for), and was awesome. Our class was smaller, around 30ish students (compared to Spring 2017, when they said it would be larger) so it was more intimate. They said that the structure of the course may change, so I don't know if they'll still do that.

Linda is great. She is actually a cardiologist in the medical school, but she's knowledgeable about autism and all the perspectives behind it, including a self-advocate, biological, etc. perspective. She's kind and modest about her own work. She'll help you as much as you can-- you just have to ask for it. Judy was equally as helpful and kind.

This was the most influential and interesting class I've taken at UCLA, especially due to its structure and content. I feel like this was an example of why I attend UCLA, to take classes and have opportunities like these. Take it.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2017
Grade: A
April 5, 2017

I decided to write a review for this class because I discovered just how important bruinwalk reviews are for students (and how much I appreciate it when people take the time to write a review). And this has no reviews at all.

I loved this class, more than I expected. This class is holistic, such that it really offers you ALL perspectives of autism, including the "legislative" part of autism and barriers to receiving help. The work is light. There are two "textbooks," which are actually more like novels that you read. There are also articles assigned each week, but they rarely keep track. I'd recommend reading them though. You write three essays and give a presentation of your final research paper at the end. Attendance is mandatory, but it's more like if they know your name and face by the end of the quarter, and you've reached out, went to office hours, they give you participation points. Make sure they know who you are.

I also loved the format of our class. Each week, prominent guest speakers of the autism community (from different backgrounds i.e. perspectives) will come and talk about their work. The majority of "lectures" were guest speakers, and sometimes she would talk herself (or Judith Mark, her co-instructor). We also were required to go to a disability policy conference (it's paid for), and was awesome. Our class was smaller, around 30ish students (compared to Spring 2017, when they said it would be larger) so it was more intimate. They said that the structure of the course may change, so I don't know if they'll still do that.

Linda is great. She is actually a cardiologist in the medical school, but she's knowledgeable about autism and all the perspectives behind it, including a self-advocate, biological, etc. perspective. She's kind and modest about her own work. She'll help you as much as you can-- you just have to ask for it. Judy was equally as helpful and kind.

This was the most influential and interesting class I've taken at UCLA, especially due to its structure and content. I feel like this was an example of why I attend UCLA, to take classes and have opportunities like these. Take it.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
5.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 4.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 4.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 5.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Needs Textbook
    (1)
  • Would Take Again
    (1)
  • Has Group Projects
    (1)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!