Lothar von Falkenhausen
Department of Art History
AD
2.5
Overall Rating
Based on 4 Users
Easiness 2.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.8 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.2 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
32.7%
27.2%
21.8%
16.3%
10.9%
5.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (3)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2024
Grade: B-
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Dec. 31, 2024

Do not mistake this class as an easy GE. The lectures were disorganized and sometimes confusing to really take note. Sometimes I wasn't able to hear clearly of what the professor would say, so my notes would be incomplete, but it was still do-able. There is a lot of reading that you need to stay up-to-date simply to participate during discussions. I had a strict TA so I had to be very precise with dates and the dynasties talked about in class. The midterm was okay, but the final was brutal. You needed to memorize 11 terminologies, 30 images, and be prepared for any of the 5 essay questions that would be chosen (3 selected). I am glad to have passed the class but be prepared for the long readings and boring lectures.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2024
Grade: A+
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Dec. 15, 2024

Although I passed, I don’t recommend this class. Lectures are boring, with slides showing only an image, date, and author. The professor’s quiet tone makes it hard to focus, and since lectures are optional, I stopped attending by week 3. Discussion takes participation, but is more engaging and my TA was kind, understanding with deadlines, and graded leniently. Our section made a study guide which SAVED me for the midterm and final.

The workload is manageable: optional readings, three papers (the second being a rewrite), a midterm requiring memorization of 20 figures (write-ups on 5), and a final with 11 terms, 30 paintings, and 5 essays to prep for. Even though not all terms, paintings, and essays were chosen, it was HELL to study for. Recalling information was incredibly hard as there were no activities to solidify concepts. It may seem easy but you'd probably be focused on topics in your other classes than this irrelevant one... Overall, there are better GE options don't do this one.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2024
Grade: N/A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Oct. 7, 2024

If you are interesting in art history, and reading about the art and history of Chinese empires, this class might be interesting and fun for you. However, don't gaslight yourself into thinking you can just fulfill it easily as a GE. If you aren't interested, I wouldn't take it. Dropped second week when they started teaching mandarin. Lots of reading every week, probably doable but didn't interest me at all.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2024
Grade: B-
Dec. 31, 2024

Do not mistake this class as an easy GE. The lectures were disorganized and sometimes confusing to really take note. Sometimes I wasn't able to hear clearly of what the professor would say, so my notes would be incomplete, but it was still do-able. There is a lot of reading that you need to stay up-to-date simply to participate during discussions. I had a strict TA so I had to be very precise with dates and the dynasties talked about in class. The midterm was okay, but the final was brutal. You needed to memorize 11 terminologies, 30 images, and be prepared for any of the 5 essay questions that would be chosen (3 selected). I am glad to have passed the class but be prepared for the long readings and boring lectures.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2024
Grade: A+
Dec. 15, 2024

Although I passed, I don’t recommend this class. Lectures are boring, with slides showing only an image, date, and author. The professor’s quiet tone makes it hard to focus, and since lectures are optional, I stopped attending by week 3. Discussion takes participation, but is more engaging and my TA was kind, understanding with deadlines, and graded leniently. Our section made a study guide which SAVED me for the midterm and final.

The workload is manageable: optional readings, three papers (the second being a rewrite), a midterm requiring memorization of 20 figures (write-ups on 5), and a final with 11 terms, 30 paintings, and 5 essays to prep for. Even though not all terms, paintings, and essays were chosen, it was HELL to study for. Recalling information was incredibly hard as there were no activities to solidify concepts. It may seem easy but you'd probably be focused on topics in your other classes than this irrelevant one... Overall, there are better GE options don't do this one.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2024
Grade: N/A
Oct. 7, 2024

If you are interesting in art history, and reading about the art and history of Chinese empires, this class might be interesting and fun for you. However, don't gaslight yourself into thinking you can just fulfill it easily as a GE. If you aren't interested, I wouldn't take it. Dropped second week when they started teaching mandarin. Lots of reading every week, probably doable but didn't interest me at all.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.5
Overall Rating
Based on 4 Users
Easiness 2.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.8 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.2 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!