Professor

Mark Huppin

AD
4.0
Overall Ratings
Based on 102 Users
Easiness 3.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Workload 2.8 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Clarity 3.9 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Helpfulness 3.9 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

Reviews (102)

1 of 8
1 of 8
Add your review...
COMM 170
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Oct. 21, 2020
Quarter: Spring 2020
Grade: A

Professor Huppin is an amazing professor! During lectures, you can tell that he really enjoys teaching the material and cares for his students. There were three thought papers, which were only 2 pages long. I thought they were pretty easy, seeing that you had to make an argument on a court case he assigned for that paper. There's only one timed midterm. He posted the midterm in the beginning of class and we had to turn it in before class ended. I thought the midterm was fairly easy if you had good notes on lecture and read the court case articles. The midterm consisted of a multiple choices and short answer questions. The final was similar to the midterm, but with more short answers. He assigns multiple of readings and supplemental reading for the court cases each week. If you attend lecture, read the articles, and study the powerpoints you should be fine.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
COMM 170
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
July 1, 2020
Quarter: Spring 2020
Grade: A-

[spring 2020 covid online quarter] Once Huppin subbed for one of my classes in Winter quarter I knew I had to take him. He was fantastic but I'll wager he would have been better in person. His teaching style revolves around asking students to discuss and critically think about the cases and legal debate issues he brings up in class. The same 10 students out of 100 ended up being the only ones talking week to week (you bet I was in the 90). He places an emphasis on showing up to class and engaging yourself (he only sent class recordings to students in other timezones/good reason for missing, he didn't post it for your general review/replay). If you don't listen and take notes, you will miss things, and his slides purposely only guide his lecture and cannot be relied on to help you study. That being said, idk if was because of that, or because of his engaging, very human and sensitive approach to the new circumstances of this quarter, % class attendance was really high every time. He also adjusted the class to talk about current events with COVID and BLM and stuff, very take it as you go guy.
There was a good amount of reading, which I didn't do very sincerely, but if you do scan over it, it lines up with the lectures pretty well and will help you do well on the tests. (Ah, I remember he said he usually assigns a course reader which I assume would be $$ but this quarter he uploaded everything online so I escaped paying for that ig, nice.) He also assigned 2 movies which were a good time, 8/10 (also gave us off class on the days we should watch those on our own, I think he usually shows them in class).
Grade was based on two tests. The questions to be honest weren't very straight-proceeding from the class material and really wanted to see whether you were thinking, which I think should be the point of school, but made it hard to figure out what to say in order to get the points.
In all, definitely take this class, but know that Huppin's teaching style almost certainly suits in-person the best.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Jan. 5, 2024
Quarter: Spring 2023
Grade: B

I liked this course and would recommend it. Huppin was very funny and the lecture content was very interesting to me. He uploads the audio version of the lecture but his voice is often very monotone so it's not very engaging, to be honest, it's best to just go. I thought the tests were very reasonable and easy to digest, just make sure you do the readings! He adds minor details that can easily cost you a couple of points. Overall, good class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
March 9, 2016
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A

Best professor at ucla. A midterm, an easy easy paper designed to boost the grade, and a final. I have the course reader for this class, brand new untouched. for half of what i bought it for. $25 **********

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
March 17, 2017
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A

Loved this class! But the final was a lot harder than the midterm, as he uses a few questions from the course reader, and if you have not read that then you might lose a few points. Attending every class is crucial in order to understand what each case constitutes of, but of course they could also be read over online. He is a great professor who is very engaging and truly cares about his students and their understanding of the class. 2 papers that are a bit hard to get full credit on-probably the grading fault of the TA's, but if you answer everything from the prompt and add some of your own analysis, you should be fine. Also selling the course reader **********

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Feb. 13, 2023
Quarter: Fall 2022
Grade: C

Huppin has a really big ego. This dude loves to showoff his knowledge on the amendments. Weird guy.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
June 23, 2022
Quarter: Spring 2022
Grade: A

Class breakdown below:
Exam 1- 40%
Exam 2- 40%
1 thought paper- 20% (usually there are two worth 10% each)

I found Huppin's lectures to be engaging and interesting. I really enjoyed the material as I felt it to be relevant information. The reading material is manageable; there are a few articles/ cases to read prior to lectures. I read all of the readings for the exams and did well. The exams are fair and straightforward. You should be fine if you put in the time to study and read the material. He offers office hours after class and also meets with students via appointment. He isn't great at communicating and doesn't answer his emails. When students had positive cases of COVID and couldn't take exams, he had difficulty getting back to them. Other than poor communication, I would recommend Huppin and this course.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
June 21, 2022
Quarter: Spring 2022
Grade: B+

There is a lot to say about this class - it's extremely interesting, for one. The material is very engaging and you will learn some very valuable things, even if you are not interested in law. However, it is very challenging, so be prepared for that. You have to put in a lot of work to succeed on the exams. Huppin is also pretty terrible at communication. He never responds to emails, even if they are students notifying him of positive covid results right before exams, and he also never got back to them after the fact. His lectures are not very structured either, so I sometimes found it difficult to follow everything he was saying until after I Googled it later. My best advice is to read all of the case briefs in full before taking exams, they are extremely useful. Definitely do all of the readings for this class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
June 19, 2013
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A

I don't remember what class I took with him. He is a great professor. You wont regret taking him!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Jan. 7, 2013
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A

This class had cases which he would go over in class. He was always available in office hours. There were two short papers which helped your grade. I enjoyed the class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
COMM 170
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Spring 2020
Grade: A
Oct. 21, 2020

Professor Huppin is an amazing professor! During lectures, you can tell that he really enjoys teaching the material and cares for his students. There were three thought papers, which were only 2 pages long. I thought they were pretty easy, seeing that you had to make an argument on a court case he assigned for that paper. There's only one timed midterm. He posted the midterm in the beginning of class and we had to turn it in before class ended. I thought the midterm was fairly easy if you had good notes on lecture and read the court case articles. The midterm consisted of a multiple choices and short answer questions. The final was similar to the midterm, but with more short answers. He assigns multiple of readings and supplemental reading for the court cases each week. If you attend lecture, read the articles, and study the powerpoints you should be fine.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
COMM 170
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Spring 2020
Grade: A-
July 1, 2020

[spring 2020 covid online quarter] Once Huppin subbed for one of my classes in Winter quarter I knew I had to take him. He was fantastic but I'll wager he would have been better in person. His teaching style revolves around asking students to discuss and critically think about the cases and legal debate issues he brings up in class. The same 10 students out of 100 ended up being the only ones talking week to week (you bet I was in the 90). He places an emphasis on showing up to class and engaging yourself (he only sent class recordings to students in other timezones/good reason for missing, he didn't post it for your general review/replay). If you don't listen and take notes, you will miss things, and his slides purposely only guide his lecture and cannot be relied on to help you study. That being said, idk if was because of that, or because of his engaging, very human and sensitive approach to the new circumstances of this quarter, % class attendance was really high every time. He also adjusted the class to talk about current events with COVID and BLM and stuff, very take it as you go guy.
There was a good amount of reading, which I didn't do very sincerely, but if you do scan over it, it lines up with the lectures pretty well and will help you do well on the tests. (Ah, I remember he said he usually assigns a course reader which I assume would be $$ but this quarter he uploaded everything online so I escaped paying for that ig, nice.) He also assigned 2 movies which were a good time, 8/10 (also gave us off class on the days we should watch those on our own, I think he usually shows them in class).
Grade was based on two tests. The questions to be honest weren't very straight-proceeding from the class material and really wanted to see whether you were thinking, which I think should be the point of school, but made it hard to figure out what to say in order to get the points.
In all, definitely take this class, but know that Huppin's teaching style almost certainly suits in-person the best.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
COMM 171
Quarter: Spring 2023
Grade: B
Jan. 5, 2024

I liked this course and would recommend it. Huppin was very funny and the lecture content was very interesting to me. He uploads the audio version of the lecture but his voice is often very monotone so it's not very engaging, to be honest, it's best to just go. I thought the tests were very reasonable and easy to digest, just make sure you do the readings! He adds minor details that can easily cost you a couple of points. Overall, good class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
COMM 170
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A
March 9, 2016

Best professor at ucla. A midterm, an easy easy paper designed to boost the grade, and a final. I have the course reader for this class, brand new untouched. for half of what i bought it for. $25 **********

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
COMM 170
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A
March 17, 2017

Loved this class! But the final was a lot harder than the midterm, as he uses a few questions from the course reader, and if you have not read that then you might lose a few points. Attending every class is crucial in order to understand what each case constitutes of, but of course they could also be read over online. He is a great professor who is very engaging and truly cares about his students and their understanding of the class. 2 papers that are a bit hard to get full credit on-probably the grading fault of the TA's, but if you answer everything from the prompt and add some of your own analysis, you should be fine. Also selling the course reader **********

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
COMM 171
Quarter: Fall 2022
Grade: C
Feb. 13, 2023

Huppin has a really big ego. This dude loves to showoff his knowledge on the amendments. Weird guy.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
COMM 171
Quarter: Spring 2022
Grade: A
June 23, 2022

Class breakdown below:
Exam 1- 40%
Exam 2- 40%
1 thought paper- 20% (usually there are two worth 10% each)

I found Huppin's lectures to be engaging and interesting. I really enjoyed the material as I felt it to be relevant information. The reading material is manageable; there are a few articles/ cases to read prior to lectures. I read all of the readings for the exams and did well. The exams are fair and straightforward. You should be fine if you put in the time to study and read the material. He offers office hours after class and also meets with students via appointment. He isn't great at communicating and doesn't answer his emails. When students had positive cases of COVID and couldn't take exams, he had difficulty getting back to them. Other than poor communication, I would recommend Huppin and this course.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
COMM 171
Quarter: Spring 2022
Grade: B+
June 21, 2022

There is a lot to say about this class - it's extremely interesting, for one. The material is very engaging and you will learn some very valuable things, even if you are not interested in law. However, it is very challenging, so be prepared for that. You have to put in a lot of work to succeed on the exams. Huppin is also pretty terrible at communication. He never responds to emails, even if they are students notifying him of positive covid results right before exams, and he also never got back to them after the fact. His lectures are not very structured either, so I sometimes found it difficult to follow everything he was saying until after I Googled it later. My best advice is to read all of the case briefs in full before taking exams, they are extremely useful. Definitely do all of the readings for this class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
COMM 113
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 19, 2013

I don't remember what class I took with him. He is a great professor. You wont regret taking him!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
COMM 171
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Jan. 7, 2013

This class had cases which he would go over in class. He was always available in office hours. There were two short papers which helped your grade. I enjoyed the class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 8
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!