Mark Huppin
Department of Communication
AD
4.1
Overall Rating
Based on 31 Users
Easiness 3.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.9 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.7 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Needs Textbook
  • Engaging Lectures
  • Useful Textbooks
  • Often Funny
  • Tough Tests
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Would Take Again
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
28.8%
24.0%
19.2%
14.4%
9.6%
4.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

30.6%
25.5%
20.4%
15.3%
10.2%
5.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

21.1%
17.5%
14.0%
10.5%
7.0%
3.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

48.2%
40.2%
32.2%
24.1%
16.1%
8.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

35.5%
29.6%
23.7%
17.8%
11.8%
5.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

28.3%
23.6%
18.9%
14.2%
9.4%
4.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

32.0%
26.7%
21.4%
16.0%
10.7%
5.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

28.1%
23.4%
18.8%
14.1%
9.4%
4.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

27.4%
22.8%
18.2%
13.7%
9.1%
4.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

25.5%
21.2%
17.0%
12.7%
8.5%
4.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (25)

3 of 3
3 of 3
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2016
Grade: A
Nov. 30, 2016

Great professor, super interesting class

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2016
Grade: A
June 3, 2016

I really recommend this class!
Strengths: Professor really does do a great job of engaging with his students and allowing the discussions take a natural flow. I was very comfortable seeking help, and I always felt that my input was welcome. I felt that I learned material that is very applicable outside of the course. In addition, it was really cool that Professor makes an effort to learn everybody's name. This creates a sense of importance and validation for the student, which is vital.
Weaknesses: Tests are pretty tough!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A-
March 27, 2016

This class was really tough. I didn't have much of a background in legal communication before the class, and it really hurt me. The curve for this class matters greatly, and since a majority of my classmates seemed to step out of Harvard Law, they aced every test while I struggled to stay near the average.

The midterm relied HEAVILY on multiple choice questions from the course reader and cases we didn't talk about in class. Know everything. Read it over and over. The short answers were common sense.

For the final, he switched the test, made the multiple choice questions super easy and mostly from lecture, and made the short answer questions tough. For the final you need to memorize all of the "tests" and lists (you'll know when you get to the material) and know specific cases from lecture and the textbook that could back up your arguments.

Huppin was a good lecturer, but thank god I am done with having him as a teacher. Way too stressful for this Communication major. Never before had I cried with happiness for an A-.

Helpful?

2 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A
March 9, 2016

Best professor at ucla. A midterm, an easy easy paper designed to boost the grade, and a final. I have the course reader for this class, brand new untouched. for half of what i bought it for. $25 **********

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
May 27, 2015

Huppin is probably one of the smartest professors in the Comm department but that can also be his weakness. I found myself lost a lot of the time because he would speak very quickly and assume the class knew a lot of information. The reading was also very dense and the class definitely deterred me from even thinking about law school. Even though I ended up with an A-, you really have to commit to this class, listen closely and take thorough notes.

In terms of class material, I did learn a lot because Huppin makes it relevant to current real-life issues and you don't feel like you are learning random theoretical principles like a lot of comm classes. He also stays very unbiased when talking about issues and loves student feedback which was very engaging.

Huppin is also very nice that has knowledge in a lot of areas so i would also take advantage of his office hours.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2016
Grade: A
Nov. 30, 2016

Great professor, super interesting class

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2016
Grade: A
June 3, 2016

I really recommend this class!
Strengths: Professor really does do a great job of engaging with his students and allowing the discussions take a natural flow. I was very comfortable seeking help, and I always felt that my input was welcome. I felt that I learned material that is very applicable outside of the course. In addition, it was really cool that Professor makes an effort to learn everybody's name. This creates a sense of importance and validation for the student, which is vital.
Weaknesses: Tests are pretty tough!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A-
March 27, 2016

This class was really tough. I didn't have much of a background in legal communication before the class, and it really hurt me. The curve for this class matters greatly, and since a majority of my classmates seemed to step out of Harvard Law, they aced every test while I struggled to stay near the average.

The midterm relied HEAVILY on multiple choice questions from the course reader and cases we didn't talk about in class. Know everything. Read it over and over. The short answers were common sense.

For the final, he switched the test, made the multiple choice questions super easy and mostly from lecture, and made the short answer questions tough. For the final you need to memorize all of the "tests" and lists (you'll know when you get to the material) and know specific cases from lecture and the textbook that could back up your arguments.

Huppin was a good lecturer, but thank god I am done with having him as a teacher. Way too stressful for this Communication major. Never before had I cried with happiness for an A-.

Helpful?

2 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A
March 9, 2016

Best professor at ucla. A midterm, an easy easy paper designed to boost the grade, and a final. I have the course reader for this class, brand new untouched. for half of what i bought it for. $25 **********

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
May 27, 2015

Huppin is probably one of the smartest professors in the Comm department but that can also be his weakness. I found myself lost a lot of the time because he would speak very quickly and assume the class knew a lot of information. The reading was also very dense and the class definitely deterred me from even thinking about law school. Even though I ended up with an A-, you really have to commit to this class, listen closely and take thorough notes.

In terms of class material, I did learn a lot because Huppin makes it relevant to current real-life issues and you don't feel like you are learning random theoretical principles like a lot of comm classes. He also stays very unbiased when talking about issues and loves student feedback which was very engaging.

Huppin is also very nice that has knowledge in a lot of areas so i would also take advantage of his office hours.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
3 of 3
4.1
Overall Rating
Based on 31 Users
Easiness 3.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.9 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.7 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
    (16)
  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (6)
  • Needs Textbook
    (13)
  • Engaging Lectures
    (10)
  • Useful Textbooks
    (10)
  • Often Funny
    (11)
  • Tough Tests
    (11)
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
    (8)
  • Would Take Again
    (10)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!