Meliha Bulu-Taciroglu
Department of Engineering
AD
3.0
Overall Rating
Based on 40 Users
Easiness 3.4 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.4 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.4 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.2 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Has Group Projects
  • Uses Slides
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
43.0%
35.8%
28.7%
21.5%
14.3%
7.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

28.6%
23.8%
19.0%
14.3%
9.5%
4.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

46.2%
38.5%
30.8%
23.1%
15.4%
7.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

32.8%
27.3%
21.9%
16.4%
10.9%
5.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

23.7%
19.7%
15.8%
11.8%
7.9%
3.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

62.0%
51.7%
41.3%
31.0%
20.7%
10.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

44.7%
37.3%
29.8%
22.4%
14.9%
7.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

35.1%
29.2%
23.4%
17.5%
11.7%
5.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

24.8%
20.7%
16.5%
12.4%
8.3%
4.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

65.8%
54.8%
43.9%
32.9%
21.9%
11.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

24.8%
20.7%
16.6%
12.4%
8.3%
4.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

25.6%
21.3%
17.1%
12.8%
8.5%
4.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

22.8%
19.0%
15.2%
11.4%
7.6%
3.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

25.7%
21.4%
17.1%
12.8%
8.6%
4.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

27.8%
23.1%
18.5%
13.9%
9.3%
4.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

27.1%
22.6%
18.1%
13.6%
9.0%
4.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

33.1%
27.5%
22.0%
16.5%
11.0%
5.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

25.0%
20.8%
16.7%
12.5%
8.3%
4.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

18.8%
15.7%
12.5%
9.4%
6.3%
3.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

23.2%
19.3%
15.4%
11.6%
7.7%
3.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

21.0%
17.5%
14.0%
10.5%
7.0%
3.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

21.4%
17.9%
14.3%
10.7%
7.1%
3.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

31.3%
26.1%
20.9%
15.7%
10.4%
5.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (32)

4 of 4
4 of 4
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2012
Grade: A
Feb. 24, 2016

I took both ENGR 110 and 111 with this professor. And she was my favorite professor in my undergraduate time at UCLA.

I thought this class on Macro Economics was great. It isn't a masters level course or anything, but I felt like I came away with a solid foundation and understanding of the subject. From what I remember, there were meaningful exercises, and the reality is that I learned more useful skills in this class than I did in my other major related courses. The professor is really approachable and helpful if you care about her class and subject. Her lectures were entertaining and involved discussion despite being held in large sessions. I remember real world examples being brought up regularly, giving lectures a sense of practicality, which I felt was lacking in many of the 'math intensive' courses.

I would recommend this course and the program to anyone.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Dec. 7, 2015

I'm surprised there hasn't been any reviews on this professor yet. So here goes...

Basically, from what I've heard she's better at teaching Engineering 111( Finance) than 110, so I would probably recommend that if you can. I took Eng 110( Economics) with her, and although I remember the subject being more straightforward back when I took it in high school, she made the class frustrating at times. Her lecturing style and organization of topics is sort of disorganized, and she always calls on students without really hearing out what they have to say. HW and exam questions also worded poorly sometimes. That being said however, she is a lenient grader, very helpful if you ask the right questions during office hours and generally does make a good effort to relate class material to real world examples.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Spring 2012
Grade: A
Feb. 24, 2016

I took both ENGR 110 and 111 with this professor. And she was my favorite professor in my undergraduate time at UCLA.

I thought this class on Macro Economics was great. It isn't a masters level course or anything, but I felt like I came away with a solid foundation and understanding of the subject. From what I remember, there were meaningful exercises, and the reality is that I learned more useful skills in this class than I did in my other major related courses. The professor is really approachable and helpful if you care about her class and subject. Her lectures were entertaining and involved discussion despite being held in large sessions. I remember real world examples being brought up regularly, giving lectures a sense of practicality, which I felt was lacking in many of the 'math intensive' courses.

I would recommend this course and the program to anyone.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Dec. 7, 2015

I'm surprised there hasn't been any reviews on this professor yet. So here goes...

Basically, from what I've heard she's better at teaching Engineering 111( Finance) than 110, so I would probably recommend that if you can. I took Eng 110( Economics) with her, and although I remember the subject being more straightforward back when I took it in high school, she made the class frustrating at times. Her lecturing style and organization of topics is sort of disorganized, and she always calls on students without really hearing out what they have to say. HW and exam questions also worded poorly sometimes. That being said however, she is a lenient grader, very helpful if you ask the right questions during office hours and generally does make a good effort to relate class material to real world examples.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
4 of 4
3.0
Overall Rating
Based on 40 Users
Easiness 3.4 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.4 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.4 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.2 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Has Group Projects
    (17)
  • Uses Slides
    (13)
ADS

Report Review

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!