Michael Osman
Department of General Education Clusters
AD
2.2
Overall Rating
Based on 4 Users
Easiness 3.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.2 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
55.3%
46.1%
36.8%
27.6%
18.4%
9.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks
Loading...

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (2)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2024
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Feb. 27, 2026

Especially in the first quarter, this class was pretty heavy on the "buildings" and light on the "climate": it was a lot of architectural history and some thermo/architecture/design stuff. I thought this class was pretty boring, but the readings are skimmable and you can honestly skip a lot of lectures and be fine, since there weren't any exams when I took it. Your experience is heavily dependent on your TA - I had Luciana and I think there was a common consensus among the class that no one wanted to be there (including her) but it felt like she was on our side.
Winter quarter was pretty boring and almost everyone I knew skipped most of the lectures. Spring quarter was dependent on the seminar you took - I took the one about sensory cognition and really enjoyed it.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2025
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Feb. 17, 2026

I got an A, and I dropped this cluster after one quarter. Here’s why.

First: Your experience depends heavily on your TA. In my case (Luciana), the course felt extremely rigid for a GE. Participation is compulsory and graded stringently, which means people speak to avoid losing points rather than to contribute meaningfully. Discussions often become a two-hour rotation of meaningless and extremely boring comments, which is unfortunate for such an interesting topic.

Attendance and participation penalties are harsh. Students were docked 15 points for missing a 15-minute Sunday Zoom meeting. That enforcement-heavy approach makes people anxious about points rather than interested in the material. For participation, only 2 students in our entire section got 100.

All lectures are mandatory, and the writing workload is significantly heavier than a typical GE. This is not a “light” class, but may be considered if you want to satisfy Writing II. I spent as much time on this as I spent on Math and Chem.

The topic itself is interesting. The structure is what turns people away. My friends had much better experiences in their GE, and I've loved my new GE classes.

I dropped because I didn’t want two more quarters of that structure. If you value flexibility and organic discussion, think carefully before enrolling.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2024
Grade: A
Feb. 27, 2026

Especially in the first quarter, this class was pretty heavy on the "buildings" and light on the "climate": it was a lot of architectural history and some thermo/architecture/design stuff. I thought this class was pretty boring, but the readings are skimmable and you can honestly skip a lot of lectures and be fine, since there weren't any exams when I took it. Your experience is heavily dependent on your TA - I had Luciana and I think there was a common consensus among the class that no one wanted to be there (including her) but it felt like she was on our side.
Winter quarter was pretty boring and almost everyone I knew skipped most of the lectures. Spring quarter was dependent on the seminar you took - I took the one about sensory cognition and really enjoyed it.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2025
Grade: A
Feb. 17, 2026

I got an A, and I dropped this cluster after one quarter. Here’s why.

First: Your experience depends heavily on your TA. In my case (Luciana), the course felt extremely rigid for a GE. Participation is compulsory and graded stringently, which means people speak to avoid losing points rather than to contribute meaningfully. Discussions often become a two-hour rotation of meaningless and extremely boring comments, which is unfortunate for such an interesting topic.

Attendance and participation penalties are harsh. Students were docked 15 points for missing a 15-minute Sunday Zoom meeting. That enforcement-heavy approach makes people anxious about points rather than interested in the material. For participation, only 2 students in our entire section got 100.

All lectures are mandatory, and the writing workload is significantly heavier than a typical GE. This is not a “light” class, but may be considered if you want to satisfy Writing II. I spent as much time on this as I spent on Math and Chem.

The topic itself is interesting. The structure is what turns people away. My friends had much better experiences in their GE, and I've loved my new GE classes.

I dropped because I didn’t want two more quarters of that structure. If you value flexibility and organic discussion, think carefully before enrolling.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.2
Overall Rating
Based on 4 Users
Easiness 3.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.2 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!