Don't take this class if its not required. If it is, good luck. Professor sucks and is very confusing. TAs are even worse except for like one of them that I did not get. The communication between all of them is awful so every kid gets different info. The content was horrible, the way it was taught was even worse. Lectures are mandatory but available through zoom, he will open an assignment during class as credit, multiple essays through the quarter, and midterm and final are three hours of hell. He literally said, "if you do not use the full three hours to write, you did not write enough" But for the final it was 10 prompts and you're expected to mention and accurately write every theory including theories that are adjacent, so even 3 hours was not enough. Just don't take this for ur own sake.

Honestly, this class was very easy as I had stopped watching the lectures at week 4 and ended with a B+ in the course. DO NOT BUY THE COURSE READER ! I literally did not use the course reader once throughout this entire class. The only hw you have for this course are weekly quizzes which are basically free points as they are dumb easy to do. There are also three required papers which all are very short and honestly I just rewatched and copied what he said on his recorded lectures into my essay. If you want an easy ge class take this and you'll end with a B+ for putting no effort into the course. But if you really wanted to try you could definitely end with an A if you were to go to office hours to get help on the paper. There is no midterm but there is a final and gives out a review sheet before and the final is exactly the same as the review sheet.

I chose this class very initially very interested in the content. However, going into the class my TA was not helpful or clear at all (Jacob) and the professor either. The prompts were not clear and I don’t think their aim was to make sure all their students can get an A because I did try to and I do think this was one of the worst classes because of how they handles the grading and prompts. The content of the class was very interesting to learn but the grading was not fair considering the lack of clarity.

I took this class fall 2020 as a freshman, so it had not occurred to me to read the reviews beforehand. I really, really wish I had. There is absolutely no clarity in the way this class is graded, and it seems as if that is intentional. I ended up checking my final grade on the last day that we had to contest it, and there was only an overall letter grade, nothing about the quizzes, final, or the three papers we are assigned. I had to literally email the professor for a grade breakdown, and he only gave me more obscure letters on each paper and the final but had never given a rubric that told us how grades were assessed (if you ask for one, the TAs say they can't give you one). The professor also doesn't like to answer questions, the TAs were the most helpful resource in this class. Finally, don't bother with the purchase of the course reader; it's useless.

I did not really like anything about this class, but honestly I'm not too big of a fan of philosophy of mind (maybe I just need better experiences with it). I never showed up to lectures or discussions (we're in the middle of a pandemic) but i managed to get a B, which depended mostly on my TA. The amount of reading is pretty heavy but I didn't do any of it after Week 4 and I realized it wasn't even necessary. The quizzes, papers, and exams all really were based on the videos that Prof. Rescorla would post every week. So, really my grade was based off my understand of the videos and I did alright, I could've done better if I had tried but yeah. ALSO, the book is also a waste of money don't buy it!!! i promise

I'm honestly not sure if it's the subject or the professor. I do think Rescorla could be a lot better though. I came into this class thinking I would be thinking abstractly, getting philosophical and existential. This was not the case: we were taught theories and often just reworded them for essays which in principle seemed easy but proved hard. Grades weren't put in until the end of the quarter...the only grades we really knew were essay grades, after about a week or two. However, the final essay, a third paper, wasn't graded or at least the grades weren't released until after the final and very late in the quarter. If we had any issues with our grades there was little to no time to actually address them. Essays were graded VERY tough, but eventually I got the hang of it: my grades went from C to B to A. The most annoying part of this class was probably the fact that we didn't even get grades for the final. We just got the final grade. The class was boring, and DO NOT buy that $50 course reader, you can find pdfs online. Rescorla's lectures weren't half bad and based on the fact that we're remote right now, he was pretty good about that. He had "group office hours" rather than live lectures and recorded his lectures and uploaded them to CCLE so we could watch them asynchronously. He also did different topics in every video so there were multiple 10-30 minute videos per week, which I found helpful for going back to study/review if I was confused. My TA really wasn't the best and I think he graded harder than others might have. He often had no answers for my questions during discussions because philosophy can be complex. When essay topics were posted, it was hard to actually get information about what to write from him. He was vague about things, which I guess had a purpose so we can produce original thought but it was horrible for my grade. Essay prompts were vague, except for the last one. But the final was great, it was literally just exactly the questions he gave us on the study guide. Overall, I would give this class a D, maybe a low C. It was a difficult GE and a lot of people were struggling more than me.

This class was EXTREMELY unorganized. The concept of a certain material is not hard to learn but this class was not put that well together. It really depended on your TA to help you in order to catch up. The textbook in my opinion was NOT needed. I only looked at it once the whole quarter and I never did again. You have 3 papers throughout the quarter and lecture view quizzes that are easy because all you have to do is watch the videos. I regret taking this class but had it not been for my TA helping me out I would have most likely failed.

I did well in this class because I had a good TA. The professor was pretty vague and didn't really care about his students. However, if you take advantage of the resources you have, like your TA, it is more than possible to do well. My TA was Shan Vartanian and I would highly recommend him. During Covid, the professor would post the prerecorded lectures which were usually pretty short, then have class open at the scheduled times where anyone could ask questions. If you engage with the material and ask questions, it is not a hard class.

This is the worst class I have ever taken. I have told every one of my friends who needs to take a philosophy class to STAY AWAY from philosophy 7. Professor Rescorla is utterly unhelpful and confusing, and in no way answers questions he is asked in a manner that anyone can understand. My TA was THE WORST and offered limited help on essays. He would create slots for office hour appointments and not make enough for the entire class to sign up with. He reads your paper for all of 30 seconds, gives you EXTREMELY limited feedback, and then proceeds to give terrible grades with no concrete reasoning as to why. With my entire heart and whole being DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS is you value your sanity, college experience, or GPA.

The weekly quizzes are so easy. The papers are hard though. You have to write exactly how English teachers told you not to write. I got bad grades on my papers because I had no example on how a philosophy paper is supposed to look. Overall interesting content though.