- Home
- Search
- Michaela Rombach
- MATH 170B
AD
Based on 3 Users
TOP TAGS
- Tolerates Tardiness
- Needs Textbook
- Engaging Lectures
- Useful Textbooks
- Appropriately Priced Materials
- Tough Tests
- Would Take Again
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Sorry, no enrollment data is available.
AD
Prof. Rombach has a very unique grading scheme for the class. The course is divided into twelve "topics," each corresponding to a section of the textbook. Each topic is tested multiple times, on quizzes, midterms, and the final. Each problem on a quiz, midterm, or the final corresponds to one of these "topics." The highest score you receive on a "topic" on any exam is used to calculate your final grade; e.g., if you get a 10/10 on a "convolution problem" on the first quiz, you don't have to do the convolution problems on the midterm or the final. This is a good grading scheme if you enjoy studying topics intensely, successfully demonstrating that you know the topic, and not having to worry about them again for the next exam.
Lectures were a bit unorganized. She was pretty easy until the final actually killed you. The previous post is right, but it didn't mention almost 50% got below B in her class....The final grade you would receive was way below your expectation since she would make you feel that you would get an A for sure before the final but was completely shocked after seeing your final grade.
The tests are straightforward as long as you study the practice exams. Plus, she gives 2 extra quizzes in case you don't do well on midterms. In the end, 25% get A- or above. There is tons of office hours and she is very approachable. I also found her explanations of problems are often quite interesting (a good thing).
Prof. Rombach has a very unique grading scheme for the class. The course is divided into twelve "topics," each corresponding to a section of the textbook. Each topic is tested multiple times, on quizzes, midterms, and the final. Each problem on a quiz, midterm, or the final corresponds to one of these "topics." The highest score you receive on a "topic" on any exam is used to calculate your final grade; e.g., if you get a 10/10 on a "convolution problem" on the first quiz, you don't have to do the convolution problems on the midterm or the final. This is a good grading scheme if you enjoy studying topics intensely, successfully demonstrating that you know the topic, and not having to worry about them again for the next exam.
Lectures were a bit unorganized. She was pretty easy until the final actually killed you. The previous post is right, but it didn't mention almost 50% got below B in her class....The final grade you would receive was way below your expectation since she would make you feel that you would get an A for sure before the final but was completely shocked after seeing your final grade.
The tests are straightforward as long as you study the practice exams. Plus, she gives 2 extra quizzes in case you don't do well on midterms. In the end, 25% get A- or above. There is tons of office hours and she is very approachable. I also found her explanations of problems are often quite interesting (a good thing).
Based on 3 Users
TOP TAGS
- Tolerates Tardiness (1)
- Needs Textbook (1)
- Engaging Lectures (1)
- Useful Textbooks (1)
- Appropriately Priced Materials (2)
- Tough Tests (1)
- Would Take Again (2)