Michaela Rombach
Department of Mathematics
AD
3.3
Overall Rating
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 3.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.7 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Needs Textbook
  • Engaging Lectures
  • Useful Textbooks
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Tough Tests
  • Would Take Again
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
20.0%
16.7%
13.3%
10.0%
6.7%
3.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

18.4%
15.4%
12.3%
9.2%
6.1%
3.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

20.5%
17.1%
13.7%
10.3%
6.8%
3.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (3)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2016
Grade: B+
Nov. 9, 2017

Prof. Rombach has a very unique grading scheme for the class. The course is divided into twelve "topics," each corresponding to a section of the textbook. Each topic is tested multiple times, on quizzes, midterms, and the final. Each problem on a quiz, midterm, or the final corresponds to one of these "topics." The highest score you receive on a "topic" on any exam is used to calculate your final grade; e.g., if you get a 10/10 on a "convolution problem" on the first quiz, you don't have to do the convolution problems on the midterm or the final. This is a good grading scheme if you enjoy studying topics intensely, successfully demonstrating that you know the topic, and not having to worry about them again for the next exam.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: B+
June 24, 2016

Lectures were a bit unorganized. She was pretty easy until the final actually killed you. The previous post is right, but it didn't mention almost 50% got below B in her class....The final grade you would receive was way below your expectation since she would make you feel that you would get an A for sure before the final but was completely shocked after seeing your final grade.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A
March 17, 2016

The tests are straightforward as long as you study the practice exams. Plus, she gives 2 extra quizzes in case you don't do well on midterms. In the end, 25% get A- or above. There is tons of office hours and she is very approachable. I also found her explanations of problems are often quite interesting (a good thing).

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2016
Grade: B+
Nov. 9, 2017

Prof. Rombach has a very unique grading scheme for the class. The course is divided into twelve "topics," each corresponding to a section of the textbook. Each topic is tested multiple times, on quizzes, midterms, and the final. Each problem on a quiz, midterm, or the final corresponds to one of these "topics." The highest score you receive on a "topic" on any exam is used to calculate your final grade; e.g., if you get a 10/10 on a "convolution problem" on the first quiz, you don't have to do the convolution problems on the midterm or the final. This is a good grading scheme if you enjoy studying topics intensely, successfully demonstrating that you know the topic, and not having to worry about them again for the next exam.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: B+
June 24, 2016

Lectures were a bit unorganized. She was pretty easy until the final actually killed you. The previous post is right, but it didn't mention almost 50% got below B in her class....The final grade you would receive was way below your expectation since she would make you feel that you would get an A for sure before the final but was completely shocked after seeing your final grade.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2016
Grade: A
March 17, 2016

The tests are straightforward as long as you study the practice exams. Plus, she gives 2 extra quizzes in case you don't do well on midterms. In the end, 25% get A- or above. There is tons of office hours and she is very approachable. I also found her explanations of problems are often quite interesting (a good thing).

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.3
Overall Rating
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 3.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.7 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 4.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (1)
  • Needs Textbook
    (1)
  • Engaging Lectures
    (1)
  • Useful Textbooks
    (1)
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
    (2)
  • Tough Tests
    (1)
  • Would Take Again
    (2)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!