Miodrag Potkonjak
Department of Computer Science
AD
2.8
Overall Rating
Based on 6 Users
Easiness 1.4 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.2 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.2 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.2 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
75.6%
63.0%
50.4%
37.8%
25.2%
12.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
May 2, 2013

One word: hated him and his subject. Stupidest course I have ever seen. Class discussions were about trivia in life ranging from biology (how many sex a stupid insect has) to greek mythology. This doesn't even qualify as a real CS subject. I was so bored in the class that I stopped attending them. At some point he found out that I wasn't interested in the course and doing it for degree requirements and decided to give me a bad grade. I can live with that but I just wish I hadn't wasted n number of hours of my life taking this non-CS class and doing its assignments.

The most disappointing aspect was his way of teaching: pose a stupid trivia question nobody knows or cares about and try to justify his supremacy over others. Sure you get an easy A in this course. However, what they say about grad courses being fun doesn't include this course.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
May 2, 2013

One word: hated him and his subject. Stupidest course I have ever seen. Class discussions were about trivia in life ranging from biology (how many sex a stupid insect has) to greek mythology. This doesn't even qualify as a real CS subject. I was so bored in the class that I stopped attending them. At some point he found out that I wasn't interested in the course and doing it for degree requirements and decided to give me a bad grade. I can live with that but I just wish I hadn't wasted n number of hours of my life taking this non-CS class and doing its assignments.

The most disappointing aspect was his way of teaching: pose a stupid trivia question nobody knows or cares about and try to justify his supremacy over others. Sure you get an easy A in this course. However, what they say about grad courses being fun doesn't include this course.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.8
Overall Rating
Based on 6 Users
Easiness 1.4 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.2 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.2 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.2 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS