Miodrag Potkonjak
Department of Computer Science
AD
2.8
Overall Rating
Based on 6 Users
Easiness 1.4 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.2 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.2 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.2 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
75.6%
63.0%
50.4%
37.8%
25.2%
12.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

53.8%
44.9%
35.9%
26.9%
17.9%
9.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
May 2, 2013

One word: hated him and his subject. Stupidest course I have ever seen. Class discussions were about trivia in life ranging from biology (how many sex a stupid insect has) to greek mythology. This doesn't even qualify as a real CS subject. I was so bored in the class that I stopped attending them. At some point he found out that I wasn't interested in the course and doing it for degree requirements and decided to give me a bad grade. I can live with that but I just wish I hadn't wasted n number of hours of my life taking this non-CS class and doing its assignments.

The most disappointing aspect was his way of teaching: pose a stupid trivia question nobody knows or cares about and try to justify his supremacy over others. Sure you get an easy A in this course. However, what they say about grad courses being fun doesn't include this course.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
May 2, 2013

One word: hated him and his subject. Stupidest course I have ever seen. Class discussions were about trivia in life ranging from biology (how many sex a stupid insect has) to greek mythology. This doesn't even qualify as a real CS subject. I was so bored in the class that I stopped attending them. At some point he found out that I wasn't interested in the course and doing it for degree requirements and decided to give me a bad grade. I can live with that but I just wish I hadn't wasted n number of hours of my life taking this non-CS class and doing its assignments.

The most disappointing aspect was his way of teaching: pose a stupid trivia question nobody knows or cares about and try to justify his supremacy over others. Sure you get an easy A in this course. However, what they say about grad courses being fun doesn't include this course.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.8
Overall Rating
Based on 6 Users
Easiness 1.4 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.2 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.2 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.2 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!