Professor

Moritz Meyer-ter-Vehn

AD
3.8
Overall Ratings
Based on 20 Users
Easiness 2.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Workload 3.1 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Clarity 3.5 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Helpfulness 3.9 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

Reviews (20)

2 of 2
2 of 2
Add your review...
July 10, 2017
Quarter: Spring 2017
Grade: B

This review is for Econ 106I. Overall, the class wasn't bad... until the final. His final is ridiculous and he does a poor job of explaining what to study for. Stay far away! Brutal curve and a GPA killer.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Dec. 21, 2024
Quarter: Fall 2024
Grade: A-

This class is pretty solid actually. Looks confusing at the start, but boils down to basic derivatives and setting stuff equal. Every question is solvable in the same few steps. TA notes are honestly sufficient to learn everything in the class, all material could be learned in like 1-2 weeks. Cramming is absolutely viable since none of this stuff requires conceptual understanding, the entire class boils down to like 3 formulas.

However, this guy's final was nothing like the practice exams, and had to be curved upwards extra to compensate.

Grading scheme: 50% final, 11% participation, 18% case write-ups, 21% homework or something like that. No midterm.

What was actually very interesting was the case discussions on Fridays. He brings in guest speakers to go over a Harvard Business School case, and the reading is actually pretty interesting.

Moritz is not a bad professor, but honestly pretty boring. I found myself literally sleeping a few times in his class before I decided to stop going. What I found hilarious about him is that he brings up that he used to work as a consultant at McKinsey. This was for 2 years, 20 years ago in Germany lmao.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
ECON 106G
Quarter: Spring 2017
Grade: B
July 10, 2017

This review is for Econ 106I. Overall, the class wasn't bad... until the final. His final is ridiculous and he does a poor job of explaining what to study for. Stay far away! Brutal curve and a GPA killer.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
ECON 106I
Quarter: Fall 2024
Grade: A-
Dec. 21, 2024

This class is pretty solid actually. Looks confusing at the start, but boils down to basic derivatives and setting stuff equal. Every question is solvable in the same few steps. TA notes are honestly sufficient to learn everything in the class, all material could be learned in like 1-2 weeks. Cramming is absolutely viable since none of this stuff requires conceptual understanding, the entire class boils down to like 3 formulas.

However, this guy's final was nothing like the practice exams, and had to be curved upwards extra to compensate.

Grading scheme: 50% final, 11% participation, 18% case write-ups, 21% homework or something like that. No midterm.

What was actually very interesting was the case discussions on Fridays. He brings in guest speakers to go over a Harvard Business School case, and the reading is actually pretty interesting.

Moritz is not a bad professor, but honestly pretty boring. I found myself literally sleeping a few times in his class before I decided to stop going. What I found hilarious about him is that he brings up that he used to work as a consultant at McKinsey. This was for 2 years, 20 years ago in Germany lmao.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
2 of 2
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!