Nicolle Sandoval Gonzalez
Department of Mathematics
AD
2.0
Overall Rating
Based on 2 Users
Easiness 1.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.5 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.5 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
15.2%
12.6%
10.1%
7.6%
5.1%
2.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2021
Grade: B+
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Dec. 16, 2021

Professor Gonzalez was not necessarily a mean professor but her class had a bad pacing. Math 115A is commonly one of the first courses where students are exposed to proofs. Thus, it makes sense that the course design should be challenging, but fair, so that students can confidently develop the skills required to tackle upper division mathematics. This class failed to do that. It felt like the class was blatantly a weeder course. The average on the first midterm was a 32% for reference. The final was the most difficult exam I have ever taken. I was quite disappointed that this class seemed to just haphazardly dump a bunch of information on the students rather than meaningfully introduce them to sophisticated mathematics. I would recommend avoiding this teacher.

Helpful?

2 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Fall 2021
Grade: B+
Dec. 16, 2021

Professor Gonzalez was not necessarily a mean professor but her class had a bad pacing. Math 115A is commonly one of the first courses where students are exposed to proofs. Thus, it makes sense that the course design should be challenging, but fair, so that students can confidently develop the skills required to tackle upper division mathematics. This class failed to do that. It felt like the class was blatantly a weeder course. The average on the first midterm was a 32% for reference. The final was the most difficult exam I have ever taken. I was quite disappointed that this class seemed to just haphazardly dump a bunch of information on the students rather than meaningfully introduce them to sophisticated mathematics. I would recommend avoiding this teacher.

Helpful?

2 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.0
Overall Rating
Based on 2 Users
Easiness 1.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.5 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.5 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!