Patricia M Greenfield
Department of Psychology
AD
3.8
Overall Rating
Based on 7 Users
Easiness 2.2 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.2 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.8 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
17.7%
14.8%
11.8%
8.9%
5.9%
3.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

21.2%
17.6%
14.1%
10.6%
7.1%
3.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (3)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 7, 2010

Not the biggest fan of her.

She's nice, but that's about it. Very disorganized and boring during lecture. Topics focused intensely on her own research.

It was her first time teaching intro psych so she might just be better with upperdivs..

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 6, 2010

Greenfield was a sweet lady, but a really disorganized professor. Her Powerpoints were always uploaded late, and she showed up to class without her Audio/Visual materials several times. Another thing that bothered me was the Powerpoints themselves--they were very poorly made and I usually had to go back and reformat them so that they were more readable before printing them. She introduced some of her own work into the course (some studies she did in Mexico), which at first I though was weird, but at the end I guess it all tied together.
Her exam was pretty difficult and required some abstract thinking. Some questions were more detailed than I'd expected, and I studied a lot.
Overall, I absolutely hated her presentations, but the subject matter was really interesting, and if you work hard to integrate the lecture material with the book material, you'll do fine.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 5, 2010

Very nice professor. She was the third professor for the modules in Psychology 10. Lectures were integrations between the book and her research. She's not a pure psychologist, but rather a mix of psychologist, anthropologist, and sociologist. Her test was slightly on the difficult side, it was short answer and not just recall. The only thing I didn't like about Greenfield was she was somewhat unorganized. Usually her Powerpoint slides were uploaded 30 minutes before the lecture began. She also had issues in arriving on time for lectures and getting the VCR to work. Despite these issues, she was a fair professor.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 7, 2010

Not the biggest fan of her.

She's nice, but that's about it. Very disorganized and boring during lecture. Topics focused intensely on her own research.

It was her first time teaching intro psych so she might just be better with upperdivs..

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 6, 2010

Greenfield was a sweet lady, but a really disorganized professor. Her Powerpoints were always uploaded late, and she showed up to class without her Audio/Visual materials several times. Another thing that bothered me was the Powerpoints themselves--they were very poorly made and I usually had to go back and reformat them so that they were more readable before printing them. She introduced some of her own work into the course (some studies she did in Mexico), which at first I though was weird, but at the end I guess it all tied together.
Her exam was pretty difficult and required some abstract thinking. Some questions were more detailed than I'd expected, and I studied a lot.
Overall, I absolutely hated her presentations, but the subject matter was really interesting, and if you work hard to integrate the lecture material with the book material, you'll do fine.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 5, 2010

Very nice professor. She was the third professor for the modules in Psychology 10. Lectures were integrations between the book and her research. She's not a pure psychologist, but rather a mix of psychologist, anthropologist, and sociologist. Her test was slightly on the difficult side, it was short answer and not just recall. The only thing I didn't like about Greenfield was she was somewhat unorganized. Usually her Powerpoint slides were uploaded 30 minutes before the lecture began. She also had issues in arriving on time for lectures and getting the VCR to work. Despite these issues, she was a fair professor.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.8
Overall Rating
Based on 7 Users
Easiness 2.2 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.2 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.8 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!