- Home
- Search
- Paula Tavrow
- COM HLT 100
AD
Based on 8 Users
TOP TAGS
- Uses Slides
- Has Group Projects
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Sorry, no enrollment data is available.
AD
Your grade is comprised of the following components:
Attendance: 15% (is mandatory, taken at the end of every lecture with students being entitled to one unexcused absence)
Weekly discussion posts: 10% (7/10 must be done but extra credit given if you do more than 7)
Group exercises: 30% (10% per exercise)
Peer review of exercises: 5%
1st midterm: 20%
2nd midterm: 20%
While the lecture material can be pretty dry, it's pretty easy to earn an A in the class. Attendance is mandatory and lectures aren't recorded, which can be annoying. Discussion posts are essentially graded on completion (plus there's extra credit). The group exercises aren't horrible, you are assigned to a group of 3 students (2 others plus yourself) and it's not hard to earn an A- or so on them. The peer review is just to make sure people who didn't do any work lose points which is a bit unnecessary. The midterms aren't super hard; they are very application-based, so as long as you know how to apply the lecture material, you're fine. You can also bring 3 double-sided pages of notes with you to the two midterms. I basically just copied down all the lectures/important readings so that helped big time. The exams aren't cumulative by the way. Overall, this class isn't too hard, just fairly boring at times.
Paula is so boring. The Group Projects suck but I think that was because my group sucked. She takes attendance which sucks because this class was so boring, but definitely not conceptually hard or anything. Midterm and Final were both take home quizzes on BruinLearn so they were super easy.
I am not sure why the reviews for this class are so bad. I am a humanities major and found this class extremely easy. The tests were not difficult at all, and a study guide was provided. They were also open note and had a generous time limit. Attendance is mandatory and lectures can be a bit boring, but the concepts are still interesting. Group projects are randomly assigned group members but the actual assignments were not difficult and the TAs were super helpful with any questions and revisions. Overall I was worried about this class before taking it and wanted to write this review to assure people that it is an easy class.
Attendance was mandatory. 30% of the grade came from group projects, in which you do not pick your group. The lectures felt very long and it was hard to stay focussed. An A is achievable, but requires lots of work throughout the quarter. The final was challenging. I would say only take this class if you need to.
I liked the guest lectures, content of the course was pretty cool. The tests were a little difficult for me, but manageable. There are a few group projects. Professor was nice, lecture was not recorded though and attendance is required.
I took CHS 100 as an HBS major elective (had to successfully petition which I did) and because I'm interested in pursuing public health. I found the lectures fairly interesting, but not super engaging in the virtual format. Although we occasionally did breakout rooms and group work, most of the class was listening to the professor give a lecture on material that was often not that challenging to understand and could be understood from just looking at the slides. Class consisted of assigned readings, making weekly discussion posts (for credit), a few group projects (which didn't take too long and were pretty easy), and two midterms (no final). As someone mentioned earlier, the readings were a little heavy at times, but I felt like I could usually get by with skimming and focusing on the main points that were highlighted in the professor's guided reading questions. Exams were overall pretty fair and were open note so weren't too stressful. I didn't love the class, but it definitely covered some public health fundamentals and was pretty easy for an upper div course I could get major credit for.
I personally found this class the most time consuming out of the three I took this quarter. It has waaaay too many readings. Professor Tavrow goes over a lot of information on her slides that we are not even tested on. Pray you get good group members for your three group projects since they can make or break your grade (all together they make up 30% of your total grade). That being said, I do feel like I learned a lot from this class about health in general. I would take this class again, but not stress myself out as much about doing all the readings. As long as you do the ones the TAs tell you to read for both midterms you should be fine.
This class is pretty easy and requires minimal effort. Dr. Tavrow is very nice and accommodating, but to be honest, I found the class incredibly dull. She is not a particularly engaging lecturer. She often had guest lecturers and they were sometimes interesting, sometimes not. Attendance is required but you can definitely get away with just logging onto Zoom and walking away from your computer. Basically, if you want a pretty easy A, take this class, but not if you want something interesting.
Your grade is comprised of the following components:
Attendance: 15% (is mandatory, taken at the end of every lecture with students being entitled to one unexcused absence)
Weekly discussion posts: 10% (7/10 must be done but extra credit given if you do more than 7)
Group exercises: 30% (10% per exercise)
Peer review of exercises: 5%
1st midterm: 20%
2nd midterm: 20%
While the lecture material can be pretty dry, it's pretty easy to earn an A in the class. Attendance is mandatory and lectures aren't recorded, which can be annoying. Discussion posts are essentially graded on completion (plus there's extra credit). The group exercises aren't horrible, you are assigned to a group of 3 students (2 others plus yourself) and it's not hard to earn an A- or so on them. The peer review is just to make sure people who didn't do any work lose points which is a bit unnecessary. The midterms aren't super hard; they are very application-based, so as long as you know how to apply the lecture material, you're fine. You can also bring 3 double-sided pages of notes with you to the two midterms. I basically just copied down all the lectures/important readings so that helped big time. The exams aren't cumulative by the way. Overall, this class isn't too hard, just fairly boring at times.
Paula is so boring. The Group Projects suck but I think that was because my group sucked. She takes attendance which sucks because this class was so boring, but definitely not conceptually hard or anything. Midterm and Final were both take home quizzes on BruinLearn so they were super easy.
I am not sure why the reviews for this class are so bad. I am a humanities major and found this class extremely easy. The tests were not difficult at all, and a study guide was provided. They were also open note and had a generous time limit. Attendance is mandatory and lectures can be a bit boring, but the concepts are still interesting. Group projects are randomly assigned group members but the actual assignments were not difficult and the TAs were super helpful with any questions and revisions. Overall I was worried about this class before taking it and wanted to write this review to assure people that it is an easy class.
Attendance was mandatory. 30% of the grade came from group projects, in which you do not pick your group. The lectures felt very long and it was hard to stay focussed. An A is achievable, but requires lots of work throughout the quarter. The final was challenging. I would say only take this class if you need to.
I liked the guest lectures, content of the course was pretty cool. The tests were a little difficult for me, but manageable. There are a few group projects. Professor was nice, lecture was not recorded though and attendance is required.
I took CHS 100 as an HBS major elective (had to successfully petition which I did) and because I'm interested in pursuing public health. I found the lectures fairly interesting, but not super engaging in the virtual format. Although we occasionally did breakout rooms and group work, most of the class was listening to the professor give a lecture on material that was often not that challenging to understand and could be understood from just looking at the slides. Class consisted of assigned readings, making weekly discussion posts (for credit), a few group projects (which didn't take too long and were pretty easy), and two midterms (no final). As someone mentioned earlier, the readings were a little heavy at times, but I felt like I could usually get by with skimming and focusing on the main points that were highlighted in the professor's guided reading questions. Exams were overall pretty fair and were open note so weren't too stressful. I didn't love the class, but it definitely covered some public health fundamentals and was pretty easy for an upper div course I could get major credit for.
I personally found this class the most time consuming out of the three I took this quarter. It has waaaay too many readings. Professor Tavrow goes over a lot of information on her slides that we are not even tested on. Pray you get good group members for your three group projects since they can make or break your grade (all together they make up 30% of your total grade). That being said, I do feel like I learned a lot from this class about health in general. I would take this class again, but not stress myself out as much about doing all the readings. As long as you do the ones the TAs tell you to read for both midterms you should be fine.
This class is pretty easy and requires minimal effort. Dr. Tavrow is very nice and accommodating, but to be honest, I found the class incredibly dull. She is not a particularly engaging lecturer. She often had guest lecturers and they were sometimes interesting, sometimes not. Attendance is required but you can definitely get away with just logging onto Zoom and walking away from your computer. Basically, if you want a pretty easy A, take this class, but not if you want something interesting.
Based on 8 Users
TOP TAGS
- Uses Slides (4)
- Has Group Projects (4)