Per Kraus
Department of Physics
AD
3.9
Overall Rating
Based on 8 Users
Easiness 2.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.4 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.4 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.6 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
18.3%
15.3%
12.2%
9.2%
6.1%
3.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Jan. 7, 2013

Ok, I'm the type of student who pays attention and does pretty well, but I absolutely could not stand this professor. The first couple lectures were fine, but then he started lecturing in circles. He would put the same equation on the board day after day, then give you another that's supposed to be derived from the original equation, but fail to explain it. And when he did explain it, it was in a circle.
He also never made eye-contact and mumbles just when he's getting to his point.
His tests were supposed to be pretty fair. Most of the problems were, but the issue is that they were vague as all hell. You didn't know he wanted for the question, and if you have a horrible TA, you get it wrong, even though it's right.
In a nutshell, avoid him if you can, OR just teach yourself out of the book.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Jan. 7, 2013

Ok, I'm the type of student who pays attention and does pretty well, but I absolutely could not stand this professor. The first couple lectures were fine, but then he started lecturing in circles. He would put the same equation on the board day after day, then give you another that's supposed to be derived from the original equation, but fail to explain it. And when he did explain it, it was in a circle.
He also never made eye-contact and mumbles just when he's getting to his point.
His tests were supposed to be pretty fair. Most of the problems were, but the issue is that they were vague as all hell. You didn't know he wanted for the question, and if you have a horrible TA, you get it wrong, even though it's right.
In a nutshell, avoid him if you can, OR just teach yourself out of the book.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.9
Overall Rating
Based on 8 Users
Easiness 2.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.4 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.4 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.6 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!