Portonovo Ayyaswamy
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
AD
2.3
Overall Rating
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 3.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 1.3 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.7 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.3 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
46.2%
38.5%
30.8%
23.1%
15.4%
7.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (3)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Jan. 12, 2024

Lecture: Extremely dry, often meanders away from his point. Absolutely no sense of pacing for the course. Conduction took 5 weeks, convection 4, and radiation was barely covered. Didn't cover any examples, just pure theory and derivations, which were explained poorly. He complained to the class over Bruinlearn that people weren't attending (without realizing the reason was that his lectures were useless).
Homework: Short, won't prepare you for any real heat transfer problem-solving.
Discussion: Poor TA scrambles to cover a week's worth of content, equations, and examples in 2 hours.
Exams: Open book, open note. Relatively reasonable, though he likes to sneak some wordy explanation problem or derivation in there.
Overall: 0/10 would not recommend. There are tolerable professors, and then there's this guy. You'll probably do okay, but acquire a fair bit of trauma doing it. By far the worst part was, as mentioned, the pacing. We were left in the dark about what we would ever cover, even until the very last day. My bet would be the most common question to him was what would be on the exam, as no one knew what he would consider fair game. The syllabus and schedule were forgone. It's hard to convey the mental warfare that was this class. Try to take Lavine instead (she co-wrote the textbook).

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2020
Grade: A
March 27, 2020

Breakdown: Homework 20% - These homeworks are super easy. 2-4 problems from the textbook once a week. The professor knew it was a light homework load but he said it's better to understand the most important problems than to copy down solutions to a lot of them.

Midterm 30% - The professor was very soft on this. The average was around a 92% and it was easier than the homeworks. 2 pages of cheat sheets.

Final 50% - Because of Coronavirus, this was a take home final that we had 3.5 hours to complete. It was challenging in the time span but because it was open book/open note, this is understandable. It was very similar to the practice final he sent out. The concepts of this class aren't too hard but there are A LOT of equations to keep track of.

Overall, his lectures were pretty dry and focused on derivations so most people didn't go. I just sat in the back and did homework. You can skip these and still get a good grade. However, the discussion sections you should not skip. The TA's select the most important practice problems and walk you through how to do them. My TA was super helpful and told you exactly what concepts you need to know. Overall, this professor probably wasn't better or worse than any other one. Like most classes, you'll end up teaching yourself most of the material.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2020
Grade: P
March 20, 2020

If you have to take this class for credit/grade, then you have to. If you want to learn the material, take another professor. Very confusing lectures that more than half the class stopped attending after the midterm. He gives hints for the midterm and final in his lectures, though, so you have to attend if you want a good grade.

A nice person. Not an engaging or inspiring professor. After taking this class, I became disinterested in further study of heat transfer. Before taking this class, I was very interested in it.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2023
Grade: A
Jan. 12, 2024

Lecture: Extremely dry, often meanders away from his point. Absolutely no sense of pacing for the course. Conduction took 5 weeks, convection 4, and radiation was barely covered. Didn't cover any examples, just pure theory and derivations, which were explained poorly. He complained to the class over Bruinlearn that people weren't attending (without realizing the reason was that his lectures were useless).
Homework: Short, won't prepare you for any real heat transfer problem-solving.
Discussion: Poor TA scrambles to cover a week's worth of content, equations, and examples in 2 hours.
Exams: Open book, open note. Relatively reasonable, though he likes to sneak some wordy explanation problem or derivation in there.
Overall: 0/10 would not recommend. There are tolerable professors, and then there's this guy. You'll probably do okay, but acquire a fair bit of trauma doing it. By far the worst part was, as mentioned, the pacing. We were left in the dark about what we would ever cover, even until the very last day. My bet would be the most common question to him was what would be on the exam, as no one knew what he would consider fair game. The syllabus and schedule were forgone. It's hard to convey the mental warfare that was this class. Try to take Lavine instead (she co-wrote the textbook).

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2020
Grade: A
March 27, 2020

Breakdown: Homework 20% - These homeworks are super easy. 2-4 problems from the textbook once a week. The professor knew it was a light homework load but he said it's better to understand the most important problems than to copy down solutions to a lot of them.

Midterm 30% - The professor was very soft on this. The average was around a 92% and it was easier than the homeworks. 2 pages of cheat sheets.

Final 50% - Because of Coronavirus, this was a take home final that we had 3.5 hours to complete. It was challenging in the time span but because it was open book/open note, this is understandable. It was very similar to the practice final he sent out. The concepts of this class aren't too hard but there are A LOT of equations to keep track of.

Overall, his lectures were pretty dry and focused on derivations so most people didn't go. I just sat in the back and did homework. You can skip these and still get a good grade. However, the discussion sections you should not skip. The TA's select the most important practice problems and walk you through how to do them. My TA was super helpful and told you exactly what concepts you need to know. Overall, this professor probably wasn't better or worse than any other one. Like most classes, you'll end up teaching yourself most of the material.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2020
Grade: P
March 20, 2020

If you have to take this class for credit/grade, then you have to. If you want to learn the material, take another professor. Very confusing lectures that more than half the class stopped attending after the midterm. He gives hints for the midterm and final in his lectures, though, so you have to attend if you want a good grade.

A nice person. Not an engaging or inspiring professor. After taking this class, I became disinterested in further study of heat transfer. Before taking this class, I was very interested in it.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.3
Overall Rating
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 3.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 1.3 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.7 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.3 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!