Professor

Rachel Chock

AD
4.0
Overall Ratings
Based on 1 User
Easiness 1.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Workload 2.0 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Clarity 2.0 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Helpfulness 2.0 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
May 28, 2025
Quarter: Winter 2025
Grade: A-

I cannot believe how badly Rachel ruined what was supposed to be an amazing, once in a lifetime opportunity to practice research in the Amazon rainforest. She was clearly unable to support our group in both our research projects and personal struggles in a remote location in a foreign country. I cannot express enough how frustrating it was to be snapped at for having questions or for needing a break from walking miles, every day, from dawn until dusk. Granted, her partner Greg was incompetent and spent most of the time hiking alone and not lending a hand to inexperienced students conducting experimental field research, but the ill treatment I and some other students received was disgusting. My group and I poured so much into our project even after she forced us to scrap all data due to certain methods (which she and Greg approved beforehand). I remember being lectured for feeling less than hopeful about attaining the high number of trials she asked for when we were running out of time to get them. And after finally meeting this quota by the skin of our teeth and putting a lot of sweat and tears into the final paper, I still never got a breakdown on why I didn’t receive an A.

My point being all the other FBQ professors have nearly a 100% paper publishing rate, and they’re said to be more supportive. I wouldn’t waste your money to be taught by Dr. Chock.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
EE BIOL 151B
Quarter: Winter 2025
Grade: A-
May 28, 2025

I cannot believe how badly Rachel ruined what was supposed to be an amazing, once in a lifetime opportunity to practice research in the Amazon rainforest. She was clearly unable to support our group in both our research projects and personal struggles in a remote location in a foreign country. I cannot express enough how frustrating it was to be snapped at for having questions or for needing a break from walking miles, every day, from dawn until dusk. Granted, her partner Greg was incompetent and spent most of the time hiking alone and not lending a hand to inexperienced students conducting experimental field research, but the ill treatment I and some other students received was disgusting. My group and I poured so much into our project even after she forced us to scrap all data due to certain methods (which she and Greg approved beforehand). I remember being lectured for feeling less than hopeful about attaining the high number of trials she asked for when we were running out of time to get them. And after finally meeting this quota by the skin of our teeth and putting a lot of sweat and tears into the final paper, I still never got a breakdown on why I didn’t receive an A.

My point being all the other FBQ professors have nearly a 100% paper publishing rate, and they’re said to be more supportive. I wouldn’t waste your money to be taught by Dr. Chock.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!