Richard Anderson
Department of Political Science
AD
2.8
Overall Rating
Based on 6 Users
Easiness 2.2 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.5 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.5 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.2 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (2)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 26, 2014

I took 169, but it's not an option. Pompous, disrespectful, inappropriate, and egotistical. Fully regret taking his class. If you don't include his publications in your paper, prepare for a grade that will ruin your GPA.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
July 11, 2012

One of the worst professors I had at UCLA, and by far the most dry & boring lecturer.

I found his lectures to be ridiculous. His slides only had long, tedious quotes from the his course readings. Slides should present concise points and bullets, but I don't think he understands that. Also, he recites exactly what the quotes say and fails to expand on them.

On our final, he came 40 minutes late. He claimed he was late because he was "immersed in a conversation". That is the most ridiculous excuse I ever heard, especially coming from a professor. You can tell his level of commitment to his course and students by this act of unprofessionalism.

His exams are ridiculously difficult and unreasonable as well.

DONT EVER TAKE THIS COURSE ON COMPARATIVE POLITICS!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 26, 2014

I took 169, but it's not an option. Pompous, disrespectful, inappropriate, and egotistical. Fully regret taking his class. If you don't include his publications in your paper, prepare for a grade that will ruin your GPA.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
July 11, 2012

One of the worst professors I had at UCLA, and by far the most dry & boring lecturer.

I found his lectures to be ridiculous. His slides only had long, tedious quotes from the his course readings. Slides should present concise points and bullets, but I don't think he understands that. Also, he recites exactly what the quotes say and fails to expand on them.

On our final, he came 40 minutes late. He claimed he was late because he was "immersed in a conversation". That is the most ridiculous excuse I ever heard, especially coming from a professor. You can tell his level of commitment to his course and students by this act of unprofessionalism.

His exams are ridiculously difficult and unreasonable as well.

DONT EVER TAKE THIS COURSE ON COMPARATIVE POLITICS!

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.8
Overall Rating
Based on 6 Users
Easiness 2.2 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.5 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.5 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.2 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Report Review

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!