Robert M Maniquis
Department of English
AD
3.4
Overall Rating
Based on 7 Users
Easiness 1.6 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.4 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.6 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
23.2%
19.3%
15.5%
11.6%
7.7%
3.9%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (2)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
July 2, 2010

I took 160 and 161 with professor Maniquis and absolutely loved both classes! The Romantic period is the only period of English literature that I can honestly say I comprehensively understand—all thanks to professor Maniquis' genius approach to teaching. He's not about spoon-feeding you an opinionated analysis of a certain text like other professors tend to do, but about opening your mind to taking in everything and navigating through the literature of the period after having established the history and context behind the work. When you understand the psychology of the time and what has influenced the writing of these texts, you can open up any Romantic literature and be able to figure it out with the knowledge you’ve gotten from this course.

I don't know where some of the negative reviews are coming from, but my advice is to go to every lecture, pay attention and you will be amazed at how much you enjoy learning the material. I felt urged to type out almost every single word professor Maniquis lectured because everything he said was so clear, concise and worth noting.

It's usually hard to personally connect with the professor in such large classes, but that's definitely no the case with professor Maniquis. He is extremely approachable and a genuinely awesome individual—just talk to him! It doesn't have to be about the class, professor Maniquis cares about his students and takes an interest in getting to know them.

The reading for 160 was not as dense or as much as 161, but if you enjoy the Romantics, you will most likely enjoy the all of texts on the syllabus. Going to lecture is one of the best ways to prepare for the midterm and final as professor Maniquis will focus on aspects of the class that he will later test you on. The paper topics he provides give you just enough flexibility to write on what interests you.

Romantic literature is fascinating by itself, but professor Maniquis makes the class absolutely wonderful! If you get the chance, take him no matter what class it is. You will be satisfied with the class, professor Maniquis, and yourself for having truly acquired knowledge.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 4, 2010

Unanimous sentiment in my discussion: this class freakin SUCKS. I would not recommend taking this class. Just don't do it. No one even goes to lecture because it's absolutely useless. He barely discusses the assigned reading, which puts you at a huge disadvantage because the amount of reading assigned is crazy. Even the TA's have agreed that the amount of reading is comparable to that of their graduate work. He expects graduate level analysis but does. not. lecture. He spent 45 minutes defining "irony" once and another time he spent a ridiculous amount of time talking about Sin City the movie. If your TA isn't good, then you're out of luck because you don't learn anything in this class at all. The grading for this class should be generous or at least understanding, given the fact that you aren't taught anything, but it isn't. Stay far away from Maniquis.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
July 2, 2010

I took 160 and 161 with professor Maniquis and absolutely loved both classes! The Romantic period is the only period of English literature that I can honestly say I comprehensively understand—all thanks to professor Maniquis' genius approach to teaching. He's not about spoon-feeding you an opinionated analysis of a certain text like other professors tend to do, but about opening your mind to taking in everything and navigating through the literature of the period after having established the history and context behind the work. When you understand the psychology of the time and what has influenced the writing of these texts, you can open up any Romantic literature and be able to figure it out with the knowledge you’ve gotten from this course.

I don't know where some of the negative reviews are coming from, but my advice is to go to every lecture, pay attention and you will be amazed at how much you enjoy learning the material. I felt urged to type out almost every single word professor Maniquis lectured because everything he said was so clear, concise and worth noting.

It's usually hard to personally connect with the professor in such large classes, but that's definitely no the case with professor Maniquis. He is extremely approachable and a genuinely awesome individual—just talk to him! It doesn't have to be about the class, professor Maniquis cares about his students and takes an interest in getting to know them.

The reading for 160 was not as dense or as much as 161, but if you enjoy the Romantics, you will most likely enjoy the all of texts on the syllabus. Going to lecture is one of the best ways to prepare for the midterm and final as professor Maniquis will focus on aspects of the class that he will later test you on. The paper topics he provides give you just enough flexibility to write on what interests you.

Romantic literature is fascinating by itself, but professor Maniquis makes the class absolutely wonderful! If you get the chance, take him no matter what class it is. You will be satisfied with the class, professor Maniquis, and yourself for having truly acquired knowledge.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 4, 2010

Unanimous sentiment in my discussion: this class freakin SUCKS. I would not recommend taking this class. Just don't do it. No one even goes to lecture because it's absolutely useless. He barely discusses the assigned reading, which puts you at a huge disadvantage because the amount of reading assigned is crazy. Even the TA's have agreed that the amount of reading is comparable to that of their graduate work. He expects graduate level analysis but does. not. lecture. He spent 45 minutes defining "irony" once and another time he spent a ridiculous amount of time talking about Sin City the movie. If your TA isn't good, then you're out of luck because you don't learn anything in this class at all. The grading for this class should be generous or at least understanding, given the fact that you aren't taught anything, but it isn't. Stay far away from Maniquis.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.4
Overall Rating
Based on 7 Users
Easiness 1.6 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.4 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.6 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!