- Home
- Search
- S Kennedy-Quigley
- ART HIS 20
AD
Based on 12 Users
TOP TAGS
- Uses Slides
- Often Funny
- Engaging Lectures
- Tolerates Tardiness
- Needs Textbook
- Snazzy Dresser
- Would Take Again
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Sorry, no enrollment data is available.
AD
This class was tough. Although lectures were interesting, you were expected to memorize virtually everything she says about 50 different pieces of art, just to be tested on 4 of them. Don't take if you're looking for an easy GE. Also don't buy the textbook, you don't need it.
Professor K.Q. is very chill and knows her stuff! She cracks jokes and does interpretive dance every now and then which makes the class more fun and relatable. She explains the material clear enough, you make not need the textbook because her lectures are basically the textbook, just more detailed . Do take notes during lecture because her slides are just pictures with IDs. I really enjoyed the class overall, BUT there was one thing that annoyed me. She assigns weekly readings that are VERY BORING and LONG, it was always a pain to read them. Though you don't have to read every one she assigns, knowing what was said in the readings helps a lot during discussion and prepares you for the essays on the midterm, final, and museum paper. All in all, I would definitely recommend this GE to anyone, it's interesting and fun, but can be a occasionally bothersome.
This class was tough. Although lectures were interesting, you were expected to memorize virtually everything she says about 50 different pieces of art, just to be tested on 4 of them. Don't take if you're looking for an easy GE. Also don't buy the textbook, you don't need it.
Professor K.Q. is very chill and knows her stuff! She cracks jokes and does interpretive dance every now and then which makes the class more fun and relatable. She explains the material clear enough, you make not need the textbook because her lectures are basically the textbook, just more detailed . Do take notes during lecture because her slides are just pictures with IDs. I really enjoyed the class overall, BUT there was one thing that annoyed me. She assigns weekly readings that are VERY BORING and LONG, it was always a pain to read them. Though you don't have to read every one she assigns, knowing what was said in the readings helps a lot during discussion and prepares you for the essays on the midterm, final, and museum paper. All in all, I would definitely recommend this GE to anyone, it's interesting and fun, but can be a occasionally bothersome.
Based on 12 Users
TOP TAGS
- Uses Slides (11)
- Often Funny (11)
- Engaging Lectures (11)
- Tolerates Tardiness (8)
- Needs Textbook (9)
- Snazzy Dresser (7)
- Would Take Again (10)