Saul P Friedlander
Department of History
AD
3.8
Overall Rating
Based on 6 Users
Easiness 1.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.8 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.2 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.8 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

AD

Reviews (2)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
April 6, 2004

I did not enjoy this class at all, and it was below my expectations. Friedlander's lectures were dry, monotonous, and difficult to understand (probably because of the heavy accent). It was one of the worst history classes I have ever taken. It is also confusing,and the text is dense too.

Also, I wanted to ask for a regrade of my essay exams, at least to talk it over with him, but he said I had to contact my reader (who had graded it). Friedlander did not have the reader's contact info, so when finally got it from the department, I emailed his reader, and HE NEVER RESPONDED!!! I felt I did not have adequate support for even stuff liket hat.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
May 12, 2003

I took Holocaust with Prof. Freidlander and found it to be one of the worst classes I have taken at UCLA. His lectures were dry and he would repeat himself over and over. Some of the information that he gave is is wrong and had he been current on new findings he would know this. He was highly disorganized and unable to follow a train of thought completely through. Don't take his misinformative jumbled class if you don't have to.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
April 6, 2004

I did not enjoy this class at all, and it was below my expectations. Friedlander's lectures were dry, monotonous, and difficult to understand (probably because of the heavy accent). It was one of the worst history classes I have ever taken. It is also confusing,and the text is dense too.

Also, I wanted to ask for a regrade of my essay exams, at least to talk it over with him, but he said I had to contact my reader (who had graded it). Friedlander did not have the reader's contact info, so when finally got it from the department, I emailed his reader, and HE NEVER RESPONDED!!! I felt I did not have adequate support for even stuff liket hat.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
May 12, 2003

I took Holocaust with Prof. Freidlander and found it to be one of the worst classes I have taken at UCLA. His lectures were dry and he would repeat himself over and over. Some of the information that he gave is is wrong and had he been current on new findings he would know this. He was highly disorganized and unable to follow a train of thought completely through. Don't take his misinformative jumbled class if you don't have to.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.8
Overall Rating
Based on 6 Users
Easiness 1.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.8 / 5 How clear the professor is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 1.2 / 5 How light the workload is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.8 / 5 How helpful the professor is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!