- Home
- Search
- Seana Shiffrin
- PHILOS 153A
AD
Based on 2 Users
TOP TAGS
There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.
Sorry, no enrollment data is available.
AD
Unless you're really interested on this topic, I would express that its best to not take this class. This has been such an overcomplicated class. Although I was not expecting an easy A, this class goes beyond to challenge what you view to be a lie, deception, promise, etc;. One required ungraded essay (or you will get an F), 2 really-long essays, and one large final with one page notes (12pt font). Technology is intolerable in her class, and is strict on extensions. She is an obvious expert in this topic--a genius, infact--and references her work a-lot.
This review is written for those who just want a quick assessment of if they want to take the class.
Class:
The class is not easy, but it is not any more difficult than the average upper-division philosophy classes. An average amount of reading, about 40 pages, will be assigned weekly. (Note: To cover the basics, in the earlier weeks, the reading amount is on the heavier side for the course).
Lectures:
They are clear and organized. At the beginning, she will write out the agenda for the day. At the end, she will tell you what she plans to talk about next class. She does a great job at explaining complicated concepts. Plus, you can ask her for clarification about a concept if you don't understand something. She will patiently explain it to you, and she will also appreciate that you asked the question.
Personality:
She will encourage you to participate, but she will not call on you if you don't want to talk. (This may make some people uncomfortable, but if you get anxious talking or something in class like me, just try your best and do not feel pressured. If you talk to her during Office Hours about this, she will actually take the time to help you through it). She may appear intimidating initially, but she is actually incredibly kind. She values honesty, so if you are having trouble finishing an assignment or keeping up with the reading, just communicate it to her; she will understand and will not make you feel bad.
Overall, I would recommend you take this class if you are interested in the class material and are not looking for an easy class to cruise by. The class is not hard, but there are easier classes if you have a heavy workload or something. The class was a rewarding experience for me where I was able to push myself and learn a lot, growing both as a philosophy student and as a person. 10/10 for me; hope it's the same for you!
Unless you're really interested on this topic, I would express that its best to not take this class. This has been such an overcomplicated class. Although I was not expecting an easy A, this class goes beyond to challenge what you view to be a lie, deception, promise, etc;. One required ungraded essay (or you will get an F), 2 really-long essays, and one large final with one page notes (12pt font). Technology is intolerable in her class, and is strict on extensions. She is an obvious expert in this topic--a genius, infact--and references her work a-lot.
This review is written for those who just want a quick assessment of if they want to take the class.
Class:
The class is not easy, but it is not any more difficult than the average upper-division philosophy classes. An average amount of reading, about 40 pages, will be assigned weekly. (Note: To cover the basics, in the earlier weeks, the reading amount is on the heavier side for the course).
Lectures:
They are clear and organized. At the beginning, she will write out the agenda for the day. At the end, she will tell you what she plans to talk about next class. She does a great job at explaining complicated concepts. Plus, you can ask her for clarification about a concept if you don't understand something. She will patiently explain it to you, and she will also appreciate that you asked the question.
Personality:
She will encourage you to participate, but she will not call on you if you don't want to talk. (This may make some people uncomfortable, but if you get anxious talking or something in class like me, just try your best and do not feel pressured. If you talk to her during Office Hours about this, she will actually take the time to help you through it). She may appear intimidating initially, but she is actually incredibly kind. She values honesty, so if you are having trouble finishing an assignment or keeping up with the reading, just communicate it to her; she will understand and will not make you feel bad.
Overall, I would recommend you take this class if you are interested in the class material and are not looking for an easy class to cruise by. The class is not hard, but there are easier classes if you have a heavy workload or something. The class was a rewarding experience for me where I was able to push myself and learn a lot, growing both as a philosophy student and as a person. 10/10 for me; hope it's the same for you!
Based on 2 Users
TOP TAGS
There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.