Seth J Putterman
Department of Physics
AD
3.3
Overall Rating
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 1.7 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.3 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.3 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.3 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Needs Textbook
  • Engaging Lectures
  • Often Funny
  • Tough Tests
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
33.3%
27.8%
22.2%
16.7%
11.1%
5.6%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

22.8%
19.0%
15.2%
11.4%
7.6%
3.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (2)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2023
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
July 3, 2023

This class is definitely a tough class. Putterman is a pretty engaging lecture and often fun; he really cares about his students understanding of the material. Despite this, there are times where he does cover topics pretty fast in lecture and it often goes above other students' head, mine included. This class had pretty tough material to cover, ranging from the wave equation in multiple dimension + separation of variables, Fourier series and transforms, bessel series, PDEs, and complex analysis. The hws and exams are pretty difficult as well, but Putterman generously curves the class. One thing to note though is that his lectures are not recorded and notes are usually not posted (with the exceptions of pictures of the whiteboard). I do recommend that you attend lecture as I found that more helpful than just looking at pictures of the whiteboard.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2020
Grade: C+
March 29, 2020

As a person, I really want to like Putterman. But unfortunately I cannot because this class destroyed my happiness. It was obnoxiously hard and I was miserable every moment I spent thinking about it. Maybe I learned enough to help in the long run but honestly I barely understood anything. The material we learned was drastically different from what I've heard others learned with a different professor. If you're someone that actually understood what was happening then yeah this class was probably really helpful. Unfortunately that's not me. The lectures were often impossible to follow and everything was way too fast. I ended up having to teach myself most of the course from the textbook (which was not very good) and the TA's office hours (which were amazing).

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Spring 2023
Grade: A
July 3, 2023

This class is definitely a tough class. Putterman is a pretty engaging lecture and often fun; he really cares about his students understanding of the material. Despite this, there are times where he does cover topics pretty fast in lecture and it often goes above other students' head, mine included. This class had pretty tough material to cover, ranging from the wave equation in multiple dimension + separation of variables, Fourier series and transforms, bessel series, PDEs, and complex analysis. The hws and exams are pretty difficult as well, but Putterman generously curves the class. One thing to note though is that his lectures are not recorded and notes are usually not posted (with the exceptions of pictures of the whiteboard). I do recommend that you attend lecture as I found that more helpful than just looking at pictures of the whiteboard.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Winter 2020
Grade: C+
March 29, 2020

As a person, I really want to like Putterman. But unfortunately I cannot because this class destroyed my happiness. It was obnoxiously hard and I was miserable every moment I spent thinking about it. Maybe I learned enough to help in the long run but honestly I barely understood anything. The material we learned was drastically different from what I've heard others learned with a different professor. If you're someone that actually understood what was happening then yeah this class was probably really helpful. Unfortunately that's not me. The lectures were often impossible to follow and everything was way too fast. I ended up having to teach myself most of the course from the textbook (which was not very good) and the TA's office hours (which were amazing).

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.3
Overall Rating
Based on 3 Users
Easiness 1.7 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.3 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.3 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.3 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Needs Textbook
    (2)
  • Engaging Lectures
    (2)
  • Often Funny
    (2)
  • Tough Tests
    (1)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!