Sheldon Smith
Department of Philosophy
AD
3.7
Overall Rating
Based on 69 Users
Easiness 3.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.9 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.8 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.9 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
55.8%
46.5%
37.2%
27.9%
18.6%
9.3%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

35.9%
29.9%
23.9%
18.0%
12.0%
6.0%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

26.9%
22.4%
17.9%
13.4%
9.0%
4.5%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

19.5%
16.2%
13.0%
9.7%
6.5%
3.2%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

22.1%
18.5%
14.8%
11.1%
7.4%
3.7%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (51)

5 of 6
5 of 6
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 11, 2009

Very very easy class. Just pure memorization. Person X believes Y because Z. The final is NOT CUMULATIVE!! Go to class and memorize the handouts he gives out and you will be fine. You must go to class to get examples to use on the essay questions, but discussion is unnecessary.

Professor Smith really loves what he teaches. Even if you don't like philosophy (I don't!!) he makes it okay.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 9, 2009

So Phil 8 is an extremely EASY g.e, but it is also the most RIDICULOUS class i've taken.
Don't take this class, unless you want to deal with stupidity the whole quarter.
Unless of course you're a Phil major.
Sheldon Smith, the most boring guy ever! He's nice, and super approachable but he is extremely boring in class.
Midterm and Final, super easy but some of the T.A's are extremely picky which sucks.
Just my advice, don't take this philosophy, if your a science major, unless there's no other option.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Nov. 17, 2008

Professor Smith is a pretty good professor, and Phil 8 is unbelievably easy. Make sure you go to lecture and get his handouts - they are absolutely invaluable. The only thing you have to do for the midterm, final, and paper is regurgitate what is said in class. It doesn't involve nearly as much work as other philosophy classes, and is a really easy A, especially if you're a phil major.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
July 1, 2008

The information in the class is interesting. He gives handouts at every lecture and they are what the test is based off of, so use them. He gives study guides for both tests. Go to lecture just to get the handouts. They aren't necessary and are very long, although he does try to get a couple jokes in. The grading is VERY subjective. My TA didn't mark anything off on one of my essays and when I approached her, she justified it by saying that she 'still gave me a good score'. So....watch out for that. Make it seem like you care and be VERY specific on the essay section of the exams. He said there was a page limit, but it wasn't strictly enforced. All in all, I'd take the class again. It's not difficult, just make nice with your TA. :)

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Sept. 15, 2007

smith is a great and entertaining teacher. the class is pretty easy in terms of the workload and the material you have to learn. unfortunately, it is NOT easy to get an A. your grade basically rests in the hands of the TA you have. my advice, get to know him/her and go to their office hours so they think you really care about the class. i ended up with an A- in the class even though i really felt like i did absolutely nothing wrong in it. the grading is really subjective and the best thing to do about it is to use VERY SMALL handwriting on your tests so you can fit in as much information as possible on your essays (because there is a page limit). i didnt do this on the midterm and ended up with an 89.4% on it (yeah my TA, luthra, was really a jerk). i got a B+ on my essay, which is worth like half your grade (even though i had several people proofread it, one of which who's a philosophy major who told me "if this isn't an A paper then i dont know what is"). so on the final (worth only like 25% of grade) i wrote really small on my essays and ended up with an A- in the class. so writing small mustve worked. only use the book to expand your knowledge. 99% of what u need to know is on smith's handouts.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 5, 2006

prof. smith is very much caring, funny and just good! i guess i can see how some people thought the topics were boring, but here is my opinion: this class tells all about the mind of scientists and just solely looking at the world of science/scientists from the philosopher's point of view.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Dec. 13, 2005

This class is definitely pretty easy to do well in. Here is what you must do:

1. Go to lecture and take notes and/or get the handouts he gives about the main thinkers and ideas in the class. These will be invaluable come time to study for the midterm and final and will help with your paper also.

2. The paper is 40% of your grade and the final and midterm are 25% each. This means that you must focus on the paper and really know what you are talking about. I did not do this, got a semi-poor grade on my paper and I now must hope that the fairly easy tests will boost my grade.

3. My section was somewhat worthless because my TA sometimes got lost in the material and the students usually didn't do the reading so we ended up talking about concepts we had covered weeks before. The best thing you can do is stay up on your reading so you get your participation grade and have an easier time in studying for your tests.

Overall, I enjoyed the class. Sheldon is a nice, funny guy and really sticks to the material rather than getting off on tangents, especially political ones, as many professors at UCLA do.

I'd recommend this to anyone who needs a philosophy GE or any psychology student who needs to meet their pre-major philosophy req.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Dec. 13, 2005

Professor Smith is a very nice, and often funny, but this isn't a super easy GE. The material is extremely boring, and, in my opinion, a lot of bs. Listen to other reviewers, do the reading, and go to lecture (and take good notes), but forget discussion, as it typically tuns into dumb people arguing about irrelevent philosophic viewpoints (very annoying). If you don't mind doing the reading it isn't terribly hard, but don't expect to only study the night before tests and get an A.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Nov. 15, 2005

I took Professor Smith's class for a GE and I'm very happy about it. The reading is pretty dense but the lectures and the in-class handouts really clear things up. Lectures are pretty engaging; I got the sense he could tell when class was getting dull and he usually threw in a funny joke to get the students up again. Tests are pretty easy... just attend lecture and do the reading to support it if you want. My TA was pretty knowledgeable, but going to section wasn't really necessary. Philosophy 8 is a good class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Nov. 7, 2005

Professor Smith was great. The midterms and paper s were very fair, hes very approachable, a funny guy as well. The book is hard to read but his lectures really clear things up. He also hands out summaries for each topic, which REALLY help. I would def take him, I took Phil 8 as a GE and Im glad I took it with Prof. Smith

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 11, 2009

Very very easy class. Just pure memorization. Person X believes Y because Z. The final is NOT CUMULATIVE!! Go to class and memorize the handouts he gives out and you will be fine. You must go to class to get examples to use on the essay questions, but discussion is unnecessary.

Professor Smith really loves what he teaches. Even if you don't like philosophy (I don't!!) he makes it okay.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
June 9, 2009

So Phil 8 is an extremely EASY g.e, but it is also the most RIDICULOUS class i've taken.
Don't take this class, unless you want to deal with stupidity the whole quarter.
Unless of course you're a Phil major.
Sheldon Smith, the most boring guy ever! He's nice, and super approachable but he is extremely boring in class.
Midterm and Final, super easy but some of the T.A's are extremely picky which sucks.
Just my advice, don't take this philosophy, if your a science major, unless there's no other option.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Nov. 17, 2008

Professor Smith is a pretty good professor, and Phil 8 is unbelievably easy. Make sure you go to lecture and get his handouts - they are absolutely invaluable. The only thing you have to do for the midterm, final, and paper is regurgitate what is said in class. It doesn't involve nearly as much work as other philosophy classes, and is a really easy A, especially if you're a phil major.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
July 1, 2008

The information in the class is interesting. He gives handouts at every lecture and they are what the test is based off of, so use them. He gives study guides for both tests. Go to lecture just to get the handouts. They aren't necessary and are very long, although he does try to get a couple jokes in. The grading is VERY subjective. My TA didn't mark anything off on one of my essays and when I approached her, she justified it by saying that she 'still gave me a good score'. So....watch out for that. Make it seem like you care and be VERY specific on the essay section of the exams. He said there was a page limit, but it wasn't strictly enforced. All in all, I'd take the class again. It's not difficult, just make nice with your TA. :)

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Sept. 15, 2007

smith is a great and entertaining teacher. the class is pretty easy in terms of the workload and the material you have to learn. unfortunately, it is NOT easy to get an A. your grade basically rests in the hands of the TA you have. my advice, get to know him/her and go to their office hours so they think you really care about the class. i ended up with an A- in the class even though i really felt like i did absolutely nothing wrong in it. the grading is really subjective and the best thing to do about it is to use VERY SMALL handwriting on your tests so you can fit in as much information as possible on your essays (because there is a page limit). i didnt do this on the midterm and ended up with an 89.4% on it (yeah my TA, luthra, was really a jerk). i got a B+ on my essay, which is worth like half your grade (even though i had several people proofread it, one of which who's a philosophy major who told me "if this isn't an A paper then i dont know what is"). so on the final (worth only like 25% of grade) i wrote really small on my essays and ended up with an A- in the class. so writing small mustve worked. only use the book to expand your knowledge. 99% of what u need to know is on smith's handouts.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
March 5, 2006

prof. smith is very much caring, funny and just good! i guess i can see how some people thought the topics were boring, but here is my opinion: this class tells all about the mind of scientists and just solely looking at the world of science/scientists from the philosopher's point of view.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Dec. 13, 2005

This class is definitely pretty easy to do well in. Here is what you must do:

1. Go to lecture and take notes and/or get the handouts he gives about the main thinkers and ideas in the class. These will be invaluable come time to study for the midterm and final and will help with your paper also.

2. The paper is 40% of your grade and the final and midterm are 25% each. This means that you must focus on the paper and really know what you are talking about. I did not do this, got a semi-poor grade on my paper and I now must hope that the fairly easy tests will boost my grade.

3. My section was somewhat worthless because my TA sometimes got lost in the material and the students usually didn't do the reading so we ended up talking about concepts we had covered weeks before. The best thing you can do is stay up on your reading so you get your participation grade and have an easier time in studying for your tests.

Overall, I enjoyed the class. Sheldon is a nice, funny guy and really sticks to the material rather than getting off on tangents, especially political ones, as many professors at UCLA do.

I'd recommend this to anyone who needs a philosophy GE or any psychology student who needs to meet their pre-major philosophy req.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Dec. 13, 2005

Professor Smith is a very nice, and often funny, but this isn't a super easy GE. The material is extremely boring, and, in my opinion, a lot of bs. Listen to other reviewers, do the reading, and go to lecture (and take good notes), but forget discussion, as it typically tuns into dumb people arguing about irrelevent philosophic viewpoints (very annoying). If you don't mind doing the reading it isn't terribly hard, but don't expect to only study the night before tests and get an A.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Nov. 15, 2005

I took Professor Smith's class for a GE and I'm very happy about it. The reading is pretty dense but the lectures and the in-class handouts really clear things up. Lectures are pretty engaging; I got the sense he could tell when class was getting dull and he usually threw in a funny joke to get the students up again. Tests are pretty easy... just attend lecture and do the reading to support it if you want. My TA was pretty knowledgeable, but going to section wasn't really necessary. Philosophy 8 is a good class.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Nov. 7, 2005

Professor Smith was great. The midterms and paper s were very fair, hes very approachable, a funny guy as well. The book is hard to read but his lectures really clear things up. He also hands out summaries for each topic, which REALLY help. I would def take him, I took Phil 8 as a GE and Im glad I took it with Prof. Smith

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
5 of 6
3.7
Overall Rating
Based on 69 Users
Easiness 3.5 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.9 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.8 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.9 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!