- Home
- Search
- Soraya de Chadarevian
- All Reviews
Soraya de Chadarevian
AD
Based on 17 Users
I stopped going to lectures after week 3 as they were too boring to pay attention. Her lectures are not engaging, but her slides are posted and they give just enough information to do well in the class. Luckily the sections are engaging and interesting, and you can learn a decent amount from that There is a ton of reading that we discuss during section, but as long as you know the general overview of the reading you'll be able to contribute. We had a participation grade in section, but I am not sure how we were graded because I highly doubt he knew our names. The midterms are essays, so you are not forced to actually know the material until the final. As long as you follow the guidelines of the essay and use the sources they want you to, the grading is extremely easy. For her final, as long as you know general overview of things and most of the terms, you'll be set.
Her lectures were honestly kind of useless, not that it mattered since you were specifically told not to reference them for the essays. There is a lot of reading, which the mandatory discussions depended on, but you can get by if you pay attention to the discussions and have any kind of background on the 20th century to provide your own commentary (for participation points.) Grading was pretty easy on the essays, which make up the vast majority of your grade.
Soraya is super nice and really cares about student learning, lectures might be dry but that's because the readings are dense! Use your resources and utilize your TA's (shoutout to Courtney!) The class isn't that bad, you'll be fine.
I stopped going to lectures after week 3 as they were too boring to pay attention. Her lectures are not engaging, but her slides are posted and they give just enough information to do well in the class. Luckily the sections are engaging and interesting, and you can learn a decent amount from that There is a ton of reading that we discuss during section, but as long as you know the general overview of the reading you'll be able to contribute. We had a participation grade in section, but I am not sure how we were graded because I highly doubt he knew our names. The midterms are essays, so you are not forced to actually know the material until the final. As long as you follow the guidelines of the essay and use the sources they want you to, the grading is extremely easy. For her final, as long as you know general overview of things and most of the terms, you'll be set.
Her lectures were honestly kind of useless, not that it mattered since you were specifically told not to reference them for the essays. There is a lot of reading, which the mandatory discussions depended on, but you can get by if you pay attention to the discussions and have any kind of background on the 20th century to provide your own commentary (for participation points.) Grading was pretty easy on the essays, which make up the vast majority of your grade.
Soraya is super nice and really cares about student learning, lectures might be dry but that's because the readings are dense! Use your resources and utilize your TA's (shoutout to Courtney!) The class isn't that bad, you'll be fine.