Soumi Chatterjee
Department of Political Science
AD
3.5
Overall Rating
Based on 4 Users
Easiness 2.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.2 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.8 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Engaging Lectures
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Snazzy Dresser
  • Often Funny
  • Tough Tests
  • Would Take Again
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
56.3%
46.9%
37.5%
28.1%
18.8%
9.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

30.5%
25.4%
20.3%
15.2%
10.2%
5.1%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (3)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2019
Grade: A
Feb. 21, 2020

Really nice guy, lectures were kind of dull although some stuff was interesting, and the workload was manageable. The worst thing about this class was the online midterms. Some of the questions were about weird small things he mentioned for a brief second in a lecture and the way some questions were worded was strange.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2020
Grade: B-
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Dec. 21, 2020

No opportunity for extra credit, there are weekly quizzes with a very short time limit and a lot of multiple choice questions. You pretty much have to memorize the readings to get all the answers right. He does not offer make ups or extra credit of any kind. Very strict and inflexible.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2019
Grade: I
Dec. 8, 2019

Chatterjee was an engaging lecturer, and lecture attendance remained pretty high throughout the quarter for this reason (also because you never know if some in-class stuff would show up on the exams).

This class did not have a lot of required items - just three online assessments that are open with a window of a few days for students to take at their own convenience. The assessments (multiple choice, one was fill-in-the-blank but Chatterjee says he won't do this anymore because it causes too many CCLE issues) covered assigned reading each week and in-class discussions.

What bothered me is the sheer amount of reading each week (around a hundred pages each week). It was unrealistic and clear nobody ever did the entirety of the reading. I would just make sure to do it by the time the assessments rolled around.

Tl;dr: Low-stress interesting class I'd recommend but be prepared for a lot of sometimes boring readings, but up to you to do them in the first place.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2019
Grade: A
Feb. 21, 2020

Really nice guy, lectures were kind of dull although some stuff was interesting, and the workload was manageable. The worst thing about this class was the online midterms. Some of the questions were about weird small things he mentioned for a brief second in a lecture and the way some questions were worded was strange.

Helpful?

1 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
COVID-19 This review was submitted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Your experience may vary.
Quarter: Fall 2020
Grade: B-
Dec. 21, 2020

No opportunity for extra credit, there are weekly quizzes with a very short time limit and a lot of multiple choice questions. You pretty much have to memorize the readings to get all the answers right. He does not offer make ups or extra credit of any kind. Very strict and inflexible.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2019
Grade: I
Dec. 8, 2019

Chatterjee was an engaging lecturer, and lecture attendance remained pretty high throughout the quarter for this reason (also because you never know if some in-class stuff would show up on the exams).

This class did not have a lot of required items - just three online assessments that are open with a window of a few days for students to take at their own convenience. The assessments (multiple choice, one was fill-in-the-blank but Chatterjee says he won't do this anymore because it causes too many CCLE issues) covered assigned reading each week and in-class discussions.

What bothered me is the sheer amount of reading each week (around a hundred pages each week). It was unrealistic and clear nobody ever did the entirety of the reading. I would just make sure to do it by the time the assessments rolled around.

Tl;dr: Low-stress interesting class I'd recommend but be prepared for a lot of sometimes boring readings, but up to you to do them in the first place.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
3.5
Overall Rating
Based on 4 Users
Easiness 2.8 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.2 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.8 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
    (4)
  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (3)
  • Engaging Lectures
    (3)
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
    (2)
  • Snazzy Dresser
    (2)
  • Often Funny
    (3)
  • Tough Tests
    (3)
  • Would Take Again
    (3)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!