Stephanie K. Seidlits
Department of Bioengineering
AD
2.3
Overall Rating
Based on 9 Users
Easiness 3.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.7 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.6 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.6 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (2)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Dec. 22, 2015

Course Taken: 167L

The professor overall was ok. I felt like the lecture and the assigned papers focused too much on things like cell adhesion.

This is supposed to be a bioengineering laborotory.However, you end up working with mostly cell culture and microscopy. I didn't really learn anything that is true bioengineering like drug delivery or medical devices. No biochemistry or useful assays either. Just boring cell culture, PDMS, some bioconjugation.

Cell culture is a useful skill but there is a lot more to bioE than just that.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
May 29, 2015

She is a great lecturer, but the administration of the lab sections is pretty weak. I don't think she runs the lab component though, so it's probably not on her. The material is pretty interesting and fairly uncomplicated.

Class Taken: 167L

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
Dec. 22, 2015

Course Taken: 167L

The professor overall was ok. I felt like the lecture and the assigned papers focused too much on things like cell adhesion.

This is supposed to be a bioengineering laborotory.However, you end up working with mostly cell culture and microscopy. I didn't really learn anything that is true bioengineering like drug delivery or medical devices. No biochemistry or useful assays either. Just boring cell culture, PDMS, some bioconjugation.

Cell culture is a useful skill but there is a lot more to bioE than just that.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: N/A
Grade: N/A
May 29, 2015

She is a great lecturer, but the administration of the lab sections is pretty weak. I don't think she runs the lab component though, so it's probably not on her. The material is pretty interesting and fairly uncomplicated.

Class Taken: 167L

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.3
Overall Rating
Based on 9 Users
Easiness 3.3 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 2.7 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 3.6 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 2.6 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

There are no relevant tags for this professor yet.

ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!