Tamra B Loeb
Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences
AD
2.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 4.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 5.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Has Group Projects
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS

There are no grade distributions available for this professor yet.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Spring 2023
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Jan. 18, 2024

This class was disorganized and it felt like a waste of time sometimes. We met every other week for lectures which consisted of the same material over and over again after the third meeting. The class really just consisted of looking at the findings from Loeb's own research and was quite repetitive. Then, we split into groups and wrote an op-ed article about some facet of the class to submit to the Daily Bruin or some other publication. If you're specifically interested in research relating to internet access as a human right, this class might be for you, but there wasn't much stimulating discussion built into each class. Mostly, Loeb would lecture for about an hour, ask for questions, and then we'd break for group work time. It may have been more interesting if we approached the issue from multiple different angles, but overall it was pretty flat. At the end of the class we presented our research and writing in a 15-minute presentation.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Spring 2023
Grade: A
Jan. 18, 2024

This class was disorganized and it felt like a waste of time sometimes. We met every other week for lectures which consisted of the same material over and over again after the third meeting. The class really just consisted of looking at the findings from Loeb's own research and was quite repetitive. Then, we split into groups and wrote an op-ed article about some facet of the class to submit to the Daily Bruin or some other publication. If you're specifically interested in research relating to internet access as a human right, this class might be for you, but there wasn't much stimulating discussion built into each class. Mostly, Loeb would lecture for about an hour, ask for questions, and then we'd break for group work time. It may have been more interesting if we approached the issue from multiple different angles, but overall it was pretty flat. At the end of the class we presented our research and writing in a 15-minute presentation.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
2.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 4.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 5.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Has Group Projects
    (1)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!