Tania Abramson
Department of Honors Collegium
AD
4.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 5.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 5.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 5.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Participation Matters
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
62.5%
52.1%
41.7%
31.3%
20.8%
10.4%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks
Loading...

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2025
Grade: A
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Dec. 4, 2025

This is an interesting, low-demand seminar that deals with topics you won’t cover much. You get to make art (there’s no expectation of its quality which is nice) which outside of arts majors, is really rare in college. The assignments are all very manageable, with 3 main art projects (no writing required unless you choose not to present in-class), 1 short writing assignment, and written final essays outside of class. Attendance is taken by stating your name during in-class participation.

The topics themselves were things rarely dealt with in college level courses, which was refreshing and fascinating. The Professors are clearly passionate about what they're talking about and have very unique personal experiences dealing with these cases that was interesting to hear. I think this was overall a good course that could be made great with some additional revision, specificity, and challenge to students.

For the seminars themselves, the discussions felt very surface-level. There weren't any guiding questions to engage or challenge students in thinking deeper or reaching certain understandings, we mostly just listened to the professors, paused a few times per class to give our initial thoughts/general commentary and moved on. There's not really deep analysis of specifics of the course content. There’s no small group discussions or seminar style conversations like I might’ve expected. If you’re looking for a deep intellectual challenge, it might not be provided during class-time, but it’s not hard to just engage more on your own time using class materials, especially the projects.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Verified Reviewer This user is a verified UCLA student/alum.
Quarter: Fall 2025
Grade: A
Dec. 4, 2025

This is an interesting, low-demand seminar that deals with topics you won’t cover much. You get to make art (there’s no expectation of its quality which is nice) which outside of arts majors, is really rare in college. The assignments are all very manageable, with 3 main art projects (no writing required unless you choose not to present in-class), 1 short writing assignment, and written final essays outside of class. Attendance is taken by stating your name during in-class participation.

The topics themselves were things rarely dealt with in college level courses, which was refreshing and fascinating. The Professors are clearly passionate about what they're talking about and have very unique personal experiences dealing with these cases that was interesting to hear. I think this was overall a good course that could be made great with some additional revision, specificity, and challenge to students.

For the seminars themselves, the discussions felt very surface-level. There weren't any guiding questions to engage or challenge students in thinking deeper or reaching certain understandings, we mostly just listened to the professors, paused a few times per class to give our initial thoughts/general commentary and moved on. There's not really deep analysis of specifics of the course content. There’s no small group discussions or seminar style conversations like I might’ve expected. If you’re looking for a deep intellectual challenge, it might not be provided during class-time, but it’s not hard to just engage more on your own time using class materials, especially the projects.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
4.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 5.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 4.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 5.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 5.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
    (1)
  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (1)
  • Participation Matters
    (1)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!