Teruko Vida Mitsuhara
Department of Anthropology
AD
4.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 3.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
  • Tolerates Tardiness
  • Engaging Lectures
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
  • Has Group Projects
GRADE DISTRIBUTIONS
40.9%
34.1%
27.3%
20.5%
13.6%
6.8%
0.0%
A+
A
A-
B+
B
B-
C+
C
C-
D+
D
D-
F

Grade distributions are collected using data from the UCLA Registrar’s Office.

ENROLLMENT DISTRIBUTIONS
Clear marks

Sorry, no enrollment data is available.

AD

Reviews (1)

1 of 1
1 of 1
Add your review...
Quarter: Fall 2019
Grade: N/A
Dec. 10, 2019

Engaging professor and interesting material, no required textbook and she gives all the readings as pdfs for free online. This class is heavily dependent on a group project component. Pick your group carefully as 70% of your grade depends on your group work. Prof. is young and has a lot of passion but isn't necessarily approachable and is quick to criticize if you disagree with her or misunderstand lecture material. Office hours are super early in the morning too which sucks for students who don't like waking up so early (class was at 9am, OH from 8-9). I would probably not take a class with her again because the lecture material became really repetitive and boring in the second half. Good news is there was no midterm or final exam, just one theory quiz around week 7.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
Quarter: Fall 2019
Grade: N/A
Dec. 10, 2019

Engaging professor and interesting material, no required textbook and she gives all the readings as pdfs for free online. This class is heavily dependent on a group project component. Pick your group carefully as 70% of your grade depends on your group work. Prof. is young and has a lot of passion but isn't necessarily approachable and is quick to criticize if you disagree with her or misunderstand lecture material. Office hours are super early in the morning too which sucks for students who don't like waking up so early (class was at 9am, OH from 8-9). I would probably not take a class with her again because the lecture material became really repetitive and boring in the second half. Good news is there was no midterm or final exam, just one theory quiz around week 7.

Helpful?

0 0 Please log in to provide feedback.
1 of 1
4.0
Overall Rating
Based on 1 User
Easiness 3.0 / 5 How easy the class is, 1 being extremely difficult and 5 being easy peasy.
Clarity 3.0 / 5 How clear the class is, 1 being extremely unclear and 5 being very clear.
Workload 2.0 / 5 How much workload the class is, 1 being extremely heavy and 5 being extremely light.
Helpfulness 3.0 / 5 How helpful the class is, 1 being not helpful at all and 5 being extremely helpful.

TOP TAGS

  • Uses Slides
    (1)
  • Tolerates Tardiness
    (1)
  • Engaging Lectures
    (1)
  • Appropriately Priced Materials
    (1)
  • Has Group Projects
    (1)
ADS

Adblock Detected

Bruinwalk is an entirely Daily Bruin-run service brought to you for free. We hate annoying ads just as much as you do, but they help keep our lights on. We promise to keep our ads as relevant for you as possible, so please consider disabling your ad-blocking software while using this site.

Thank you for supporting us!